michaelm
vox nihili
In my opinion, an argument can be made that they should have kept Culley for one more year.
I can't see any reason to justify keeping Lovie after the way the team performed under his leadership.
And circling back, Lovie's poor performance is the only reason an argument could be made that Culley should have been retained.
I can't see any reason to justify keeping Lovie after the way the team performed under his leadership.
And circling back, Lovie's poor performance is the only reason an argument could be made that Culley should have been retained.