Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
Vinny said:To me...it is very hard to make any judgments on backs until there is full contact...but he looks like he has enough speed to get to the edge, but I think he is battling for the 3rd rb spot. I think Morency will take solid command of rb2 before the preseason is over.
Nice thanks, I was JUST about to look them up.Lucky said:
I think that Smith will be our goal line/short yardage back (unless we bring someone else in)....I don't see him as a primary back since I'm still very high on Vernand...jmo.TexansSeminole said:I think Smith will take the #2 spot. He is more experienced and has alot to teach, usually if you want a guy to teach your young running backs you would want to have the guy play enough to prove himself. But now that I think about it, I dont really think there are set depth charts in this offensive system. I'd bet that Morency and Smith would have the same amount of carries this season, but injuries that may occur/persist bring a whole new factor into it.
Does this mean Vinny, that you don't believe A. Smith will be making the squad?Vinny said:To me...it is very hard to make any judgments on backs until there is full contact...but he looks like he has enough speed to get to the edge, but I think he is battling for the 3rd rb spot. I think Morency will take solid command of rb2 before the preseason is over.
read the post directly above yours.El Tejano said:Does this mean Vinny, that you don't believe A. Smith will be making the squad?
I for one believe that this year will have Chris Taylor battling for the 4th RB spot for this season only. I think a year in the NFL will do him some good. I'm not sure what kind of ST player A. Smith is but I am sure he can contribute there, making him a little more valuable.
Vinny said:I think that Smith will be our goal line/short yardage back (unless we bring someone else in)....I don't see him as a primary back since I'm still very high on Vernand...jmo.
I typed in 3rd back...but I meant last rb on the roster....but yeah...I can see a scenario where Smith doesn't make the team....Taylor as well.El Tejano said:Does this mean Vinny, that you don't believe A. Smith will be making the squad?
I for one believe that this year will have Chris Taylor battling for the 4th RB spot for this season only. I think a year in the NFL will do him some good. I'm not sure what kind of ST player A. Smith is but I am sure he can contribute there, making him a little more valuable.
joetexan said:I've seen at least one avatar that has a photo of him and says, "Chris Taylor is a Beast." Anybody have any background on him i.e. college, stats, etc.?
wrestler4life said:who is out fastest back?
Well that, and the fact that Taylor wasn't getting many carries with his team down 20 to 30 points. Indiana finished 1-7 in the Big Ten last year. Taylor gained over 100 yards in the win.TexansSeminole said:There are alot of things that it could mean though, it could have been the system, etc.
wrestler4life said:who is out fastest back?
mexican_texan said:Chris Taylor's stats are unimpressive at best. His best games were against "powerhouses" like Illinois. If his speed is his only thing that makes him pop out to guys at practice, then we should look at Trung Candidate.
Indiana lost their last seven games by a score of 249 to 95...so yeah, they were behind quite a bit. Only Dom Capers runs when trying to play catch-up ball (couldn't resist).Lucky said:Well that, and the fact that Taylor wasn't getting many carries with his team down 20 to 30 points. Indiana finished 1-7 in the Big Ten last year. Taylor gained over 100 yards in the win.
Some might mean "quickness" or "explosiveness" when saying fastest, butwrestler4life said:who is out fastest back?
El Tejano said:Does this mean Vinny, that you don't believe A. Smith will be making the squad?
I for one believe that this year will have Chris Taylor battling for the 4th RB spot for this season only. I think a year in the NFL will do him some good. I'm not sure what kind of ST player A. Smith is but I am sure he can contribute there, making him a little more valuable.
Coach C. said:First- A speed back is considered not only quick laterally but having exceptional straight line speed. Examples would be Tiki Barber, Brian Westbrook, and the NO Saints Rookie(I will not speak his name so this thread is not corrupted).
So when you ask who is the fastest of our RBs it is clearly Morency.
2nd- Antowain Smith is a short yardage and goalline back that is used quite often in Denver's system. Usually it is a Fullback if they do not have a true all purpose guy. Smith will be to us what Jonathan Wells should have been a power back that will get in get tough yards and really mentor guys like Morency and Taylor. DD will have limited carries split between Morency and Smith, with Taylor seeing spot duty. Morency and Taylor could handle the overall job if DD was put on the shelf though.
3rd- Taylor is a mid-road back meaning that he is similar to but not nearly as talented as like a Larry Johnson. His running style is very similar. He is a one cut get downhill back that has enough speed to get to the outside and break long runs, but he will resort to power before he tries to use his speed.
Coach C. said:3rd- Taylor is a mid-road back meaning that he is similar to but not nearly as talented as like a Larry Johnson. His running style is very similar. He is a one cut get downhill back that has enough speed to get to the outside and break long runs, but he will resort to power before he tries to use his speed.
TexanFan881 said:I must ask, where does Wali Lundy fit into the picture?
tulexan said:How funny would it be if Taylor became the starting RB and ended up with more yards than the #2 pick.
tulexan said:How funny would it be if Taylor became the starting RB and ended up with more yards than the #2 pick.
Well, Antoin might make the club. But it is clear, from what I saw in pracftice, he dose not have the gear left anymore to reach the seven hole on the strech play. And since that is a primary weapon in this offense, if he makes the club it will be as the short yardage/ goal line back. JMHO.TexansSeminole said:I think Smith will take the #2 spot. He is more experienced and has alot to teach, usually if you want a guy to teach your young running backs you would want to have the guy play enough to prove himself. But now that I think about it, I dont really think there are set depth charts in this offensive system. I'd bet that Morency and Smith would have the same amount of carries this season, but injuries that may occur/persist bring a whole new factor into it.
gpshafer_1976 said:I think that Smith was an emergency addition, nothing more. DD's injury caused us grab a guy (Smith) as insurance.
If we acquire another veteran RB (Bennett?) then I think Smith is cut. If we cannot secure another veteran RB, I think he might squeek by and make the roster.
I just am not sold on Smith being as big a part of our team as Kubiak and others are saying. That's a move to make Smith feel needed and/or wanted, IMO, and I just have always felt Smith was an insurance acquisition the whole time. Otherwise, we'd be set with DD, Morency, Lundy, Smith, and Taylor--That's FIVE RBs right there that could battle it out for the roster spots.
So why are we still seeing Kubiak make mention of looking at veteran RBs? Because DD is injured and Smith is not the best answer for taking up an entire roster spot. Throw in an unknown commodity like Taylor, and you have Morency and Lundy as the two backs with the most talent who could proably carry the rock with the level of consistency that we need.
I tend to look at things logically. And logic tells me that Smith is not anywhere near the top of Kubiak's list. I think he's dead serious when he says he's still looking at veteran RBs out there. And if he gets a guy he wants, then I think Smith HAS to be the odd-man out.
Do any of you reallllllly think Smith offers more than Morency, Lundy, Bennett, etc? I don't. He had his time, and it's slipping away quickly. And Bennett's not far behind him, either.
caspian said:Anyone else think it's ironic that we're having significant RB concerns on the heels of passing on the greatest college RB we've seen in at least a decade?
Beautiful. I couldn't have said it better.jerek said:If we were having concerns, it might be ironic. If Reggie Bush was the better choice, even moreso.
caspian said:Anyone else think it's ironic that we're having significant RB concerns on the heels of passing on the greatest college RB we've seen in at least a decade?
As formidable a weapon as Bush is, he is a more versatile and even exotice offensive player as compared to the traditional, full time set back the Texans now need in their backfield.caspian said:Anyone else think it's ironic that we're having significant RB concerns on the heels of passing on the greatest college RB we've seen in at least a decade?
Zac said:And Taylor and Lundi are toss ups. One is an undrafted guy, the other a 6th round guy. Obviously, if they make it in the league, they are making it because they've got heart. Everyteam in the league had a chance at them more than once, and passed on them several times. I think that following wether they make the roster is fun and all, but STATISTICALLY SPEAKING, it would be a huge coup if they were even serviceable in the NFL for even ONE YEAR!!!!
HOOK'EM said:Could Chris Taylor be the next Terrell Davis?