Let's see, over 3,500 yards, positive td/int, passer rating better than Brady, completion percentage better than Brady all in the 3rd year of a brand new expansion team and in his third year after being beat like a pinata at fat kids birthday. In the first 6 games of 04 he was the 6th ranked QB with a QB rating of over 100. Yup, those are ALL bad things. Did things go south.....you bet...all OVER the team. Couldn't catch, couldn't stop the run, couldn't get to the QB and couldn't hold a lead. Constantly turned turtle the minute we got any sort of lead eventhough the defense couldn't hold water, much less a lead. Did the second half of 2004 and all of 2005 look bad....absolutly, but the TEAM as a whole gave up on the crap that Capers and company were serving up when the intire league figured out what to do and our CRACK coaching staff couldn't figure out how to manage and counteract what was happening. Then when Carr gets the keys to drive he turns it up big time and then our CRACK coaching staff nixes that. Nope the kid hasn't shown squat. Is all perfect...hardly, but there is some real good talent there that has been horribly mismanaged and not supported with a proper cast around him. Do we owe him, IMO, you bet your backside we do. Min of 1-2 years under a new staff. You would be hard pressed to point to another QB that has been this poorly supported by team quality, coaching and management. Make no mistack about it, I am not a Carr appologist, but I also get pissed off when people only say the negative. As I told another poster, if all that was brought up was you worst tests in school and never any of the ones you past....guess what...you would look about as smart as a door stop. That's what a group of people on here are trying to do to further their agenda to discredit so that anyone they support then looks better whether there is any NFL level play to support it or not.