Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
Top 5? Top 10? Top half?
Anything less than that It'd take a good argument for me to entertain.
Offensively - Top 5.
Defensively - mid pack until they show they're better than that
Special Teams - mid pack; mainly because we have a pretty solid PK and we've upgraded at punter. The return and cover teams are keeping those units from being any higher.
Difficult for me to answer so I did not vote. Offense should be top 5 and I think defense at least middle, 15-17? If CB#2 is addressd, ILBs remain healthy and we can slow run game against us, defense can be at least top 10. Mario is the player that could tip this thing into stratosphere if he ends up as disruptive as Wade thinks. If the stars line up just right we could have a Super Bowl team. Pittsburgh remains the only team I see as a loss.
Dang...I put bottom half.
Players who would start on MOST other teams:
Offense
Schaub
Foster
Andre
Daniels
Defense:
Joseph
Demeco
Cushing
Mario
And...that's it. Four locks on each side of the ball (and I'd even call into question the two linebackers. They're coming off injury and there's a lot of talented linebackers out there).
I feel like the scheme of our offense as well as the absolute greatness of Andre and Arian make our offense much better than the talent that is there. The whole sum of the parts is greater than the parts individually thing.
Defensively...we have some potential talent. JJ Watt looks like he could be great, Reed looks nice, but would they START on MOST other teams? Dunno.
Maybe I'm being overly critical because I know I'm biased, but I'd say we're bottom half in talent terms. I think we'll overachieve though as far as actual W/L goes
We've got the best WR in the bidness. We've got a top 10-12 QB who, with a couple of good seasons, could catapult himself into the Elite range. We've got a RB that led the league in rushing last year and the OL that blocked for him.
We've got, I think, one of the elite TEs and easily the most under-rated. On top of that, I think with Casey, we might have another amazing weapon.
On the defense, we've got 2 Defensive Rookies of the Year and a #1 overall pick. One of our CBs is in the top 10 range. With Barwin, Reed, Braman, Sharpton, Watt, and Antonio Smith... we've got a talented front 7. We'll see about the rest of the back 3.
But for me, you take that all together... and I say top 10 talentwise.
So now the onus is on the coaches to translate that into a top 10 record.
We've got the best WR in the bidness. We've got a top 10-12 QB who, with a couple of good seasons, could catapult himself into the Elite range. We've got a RB that led the league in rushing last year and the OL that blocked for him.
We've got, I think, one of the elite TEs and easily the most under-rated. On top of that, I think with Casey, we might have another amazing weapon.
On the defense, we've got 2 Defensive Rookies of the Year and a #1 overall pick. One of our CBs is in the top 10 range. With Barwin, Reed, Braman, Sharpton, Watt, and Antonio Smith... we've got a talented front 7. We'll see about the rest of the back 3.
But for me, you take that all together... and I say top 10 talentwise.
So now the onus is on the coaches to translate that into a top 10 record.
Offensively - Top 5.
offense has top 10 talent, I don't think anyone would argue that. But, the defense and special teams are not top 10 by any means. For an over all team score, I voted average, although I do think they are probably above average, but certainly not top 10 over all.
First, let me say I study our team... and observe other teams, so I can't really say.
However, I'd have a hard time believing we're top five, even on offense.
Schaub, AJ, Daniels, Arian...... Tate(??) & that's it. Some teams have as much talent on their offensive lines alone.
I got to say a lot of our backups start on most teams in the nfl maybe not the packers but really who wouldn't start Tate? Tennessee? Who wouldn't start reed? Smith? Barwin? I mean after this yr is done I am thinking a lot of teams would. Several of out O linemn?? I meanthey blocked for the number 1 rusher last yr and one ofthe top passers for the last 3 yrs,.. The only starter we got on O that I think wouldn't start on most teams is JJ and maybe walter (I but I will say walter has some hands on him and is a solid route runner). On D probably could go with KJ wouldn't start and cody or mitchel other than that who wouldn't start on MOST teams? I also tend to think that with jojo to teach him and WP KJ is gonna be good this yr.
Also MOST teams have people in one position or another that would not start on most teams, it is a function of the salary cap and honestly because it keeps teams as even as possible I like it. You can't have 11 Mannings or Fosters or AJ's running around on each team, just not gonna happen. One thing I do hope that we do this year is use the talent we have more effectively. That is really who wins cause barring AF type guys making well under what they deserve the Cap keeps the market pretty even.
I say the easy way to figure this out is you take rankings. What have we proved on field?
Well, last year, we were 3rd in offense, ergo, top 5.
However, last year, in defense, we were 3A high school quality. So, bottom 5.
This year, strictly speculating, we should be returning the same offense, if not improved, so that's stays top 5, easily. As far as defense is concerned, is it too much to speculate that we'll be AT LEAST middle of the pack? If not, then if you take 16 and add it to 2 (my estimate of where the offense will be) then you get 18. Divide by 2 and you get 9. That puts us in top 10.
Oh crap, Special teams....Yeah, middle of the pack sounds about right..haha
How many teams have a top tier qb, elite rb with good depth behind him, elite wr, top tier te, a good o-line and a fb that causes match up problems like Casey?
Not to knock other top offenses, but is it really a stretch that we have top 5 talent there?
I dunno about that.
I know there are offenses that are more productive, but would the saints, colts, packers, chargers, who else? Be less productive if we switched all offensive pieces sans the qb and system?
I say the easy way to figure this out is you take rankings. What have we proved on field?
Well, last year, we were 3rd in offense, ergo, top 5.
Let's look at the Jets Offense.
RB, WR, QB, TE.. surely not equals, but still a talented bunch of guys. Then you throw in Mangold, Debrick.... maybe one of their young guards...
The NFL is a talented league, you know that. Top 5..... man that's tough when we've got Walter & JJ as our #2/3.... sure they're talented, but the Jets got Plax & Santonio, Greene & LT, Dustin Keller ain't no OD, but he's not a slouch either.
I really think that has more to do with Kubiak than our talent level.
We are way more talented on defense. If Wade can replicate what Kubiak does on offense with the talent he's got... we ought to have one of the better defenses in the league for years to come.
Are you going off of production or talent?
Honestly, after reading tk's post about studying vs observing I'm a little less sure.
The talent is there though.
That depends on how you rate talent. If you rate talent by any means other than their draft position, then it's subjective. It you rated strickly by draft postion, I would say the Texans have an excellent defense and a only an above average offense. Which, of course, isn't the case.
I think we will see some good play from our 2s. Who was not pleased with the way Butler filled in for Brown? I like the way Pemberton played vs SF but was surprised Shelley Smith did not do enough. We seem to have a good LB rotation which should benefit ST. I think the NT & slowing the run will continue to get better; but remain uneasy about corners. If Nolan continues with his most recent efforts, Quin moving back to #2 CB could be an option if Allen or KJ don't please Wade.I got to say a lot of our backups start on most teams in the nfl maybe not the packers but really who wouldn't start Tate? Tennessee? Who wouldn't start reed? Smith? Barwin? I mean after this yr is done I am thinking a lot of teams would. Several of out O linemn?? I meanthey blocked for the number 1 rusher last yr and one ofthe top passers for the last 3 yrs,.. The only starter we got on O that I think wouldn't start on most teams is JJ and maybe walter (I but I will say walter has some hands on him and is a solid route runner). On D probably could go with KJ wouldn't start and cody or mitchel other than that who wouldn't start on MOST teams? I also tend to think that with jojo to teach him and WP KJ is gonna be good this yr.
Also MOST teams have people in one position or another that would not start on most teams, it is a function of the salary cap and honestly because it keeps teams as even as possible I like it. You can't have 11 Mannings or Fosters or AJ's running around on each team, just not gonna happen. One thing I do hope that we do this year is use the talent we have more effectively. That is really who wins cause barring AF type guys making well under what they deserve the Cap keeps the market pretty even.
If ny kept Sanchez, and we swapped everything else do you think that he'd do better or worse with our weapons and o-line?
I have to think that throwing to aj, od, Casey, Walter, dreesen, jj would not be something sanchize would dread. Then handing off to foster.
Well yeah, i asked because I wanted opinions.
If you are just looking at the players we have, excluding all other factors, how would you rank then talent wise?
Forget about rankings. Forget about coaching. Imagine all teams played for the same coach and ran the same plays. How would we rank?
The last thing I'm going to say on this....
Kubiak has been making lemonade for 6 seasons trying to get a defense that works. I think Wade is the missing piece & we're finally going to see that happen. Hopefully we can get a true compliment to AJ in the 2012 draft, or a true upgrade to the interior of our offensive line.
Then again, maybe someone will make Wade an offer he can't refuse after our Super Bowl run..... & we'll be back at square 1.
♪
What teams do you think have more talent than the texans?
Tate hasn't proved anything yet, I doubt "most" teams (more than 16) would definitely start Tate. Barwin, same thing.
I was on the fence about Antonio, I think we as Texans fans overvalue our players. It's true about every sport fan. We know our players and think they're the cat's pajamas, but other teams think "who?"
Several of our o-linemen? I doubt that the majority of NFL teams would start them. They're undersized and not talented to start on more than 16 teams in the NFL. But, like I said, this is a case of the whole being greater than the sum of the parts. The scheme and combination of the line, as well as the starting 5 being able to gel together makes them a great line together. That being said, you put Meyers up on the trading block, and I don't know how much interest you get.
On defense, I don't think either of our safeties are top 15 players. Glover, who knows, but you put him out there, and I doubt more than 16 teams put him in at STARTING safety, him being a newbie to safety and all. Manning was fighting for a safety spot with da Bears, so I'm not real sure he would either. I guess I'd give him the benefit of the doubt.
And yes, of course every NFL team has holes. But what I was saying is that the Texans talent, in my opinion, might not stack up to the rest of the NFL. Or at the very least, I am trying to say that we as Texans fans are overvaluing our players. The very fact that you said KJ "probably" wouldn't start on most teams is evidence enough. He definitely wouldn't.
Went top half only because of the D being an Albatross around the Offenses neck until I see otherwise on the field for 4 Q's in a REAL game.
Offense is Top 5, hell, Top 3 I think last year. I know the D has improved, but we haven't seen real, live, this game matters Football yet so I can't just go crazy over it.
But overall, as a team I think we are looking good so far.
I voted top 10. We're definitely a bad azz paper tiger. I'm hoping this year's version ends up with the production to put some real tiger, teeth and all, on the field.
I also don't think you can break up the three phases of the game into equal 1/3's. The O and D are in on 85+% of the plays. ST's are important, but you can consistently win with par/subpar play there easier than par/subpar play on O and/or D.
I voted top 10. We're definitely a bad azz paper tiger. I'm hoping this year's version ends up with the production to put some real tiger, teeth and all, on the field.
I also don't think you can break up the three phases of the game into equal 1/3's. The O and D are in on 85+% of the plays. ST's are important, but you can consistently win with par/subpar play there easier than par/subpar play on O and/or D.
The less talented teams could very easily see 20% out of ST, so it could balance out quite well with the top 5 teams using St's only 5-10% of the time. Regardless, I think we agree that ST's don;t factor equally with SD's and SO's.I see your point about all three phases not being completely equal. But I'd go 40/40/20. The extra 5% (I know, hardly worth quibbling over but the game ain't 'til tomorrow ) is because I think having a dependable PK and decent punter are important.
Having a PK you can depend on in the clutch could mean an extra win or two.
Having a decent punter that can give you good hang time and distance can win the field position "battle" in tight games.
Anything we can get out of our return teams is gravy.