You can have a good foundation and really eff up other parts of the home, TK.
Good foundations need good subcontractors to come in and finish it out. If Kubiak is the general contractor of this building project, he gets an "A" for the foundation, and an "F" for finishing out the house.
That's a great analogy. Thanks for bringing that up.
Who would you have brought in?
Here's a list of all the 2009-2010 free agents..... pick a guy, any guy who went from one team to another, that would have undoubtedly helped our defense.
I understand what you're saying. Look at the Jets, look what they did. Look at the Ravens, look what they did.... I get it. Both teams signed offensive Free agents.
IMO, the only guys that would have helped, were DEs & a good argument can be made for why we didn't go after the FA DEs.
I'm not coming at this from a "save Kubiak" P.O.V. Fire him.. I agree with that decision. Keep him, hire a DC.... because Kubiak obviously can't...... That's not me.
I'm talking about from a franchise standpoint.
If you can't get your General Contractor the materials he needs do you fire him? Or do you fire the guy in charge of getting the materials?
If the supply of materials is deminished because of El Nino, do you fire the materials guy anyway?
Or do you take a look at what they had to work with, & go from there.
You picked the GC, because he builds good houses (teams) did he do a good job or a bad job with the material he had to work with?????????
You picked the Material man, because you believed that he could do a good job in that department? Didn't get us anything in the offseason... was that the fault of your guy, or the market? After the season started, did how'd he do?
Your answers to those questions, my answers to those questions most likely don't match McNair's answers.. I don't agree with what is "obviously" McNair's answer, but I can understand them.
Excuses
I know, but that's all they're giving us right now.