Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!

McNair Reflects and Reveals..........

They have almost reached our level.... burn.

He mentions Cal in this article as a person who he gives a lot of weight to. We blast McNair, Smith and Kubiak on a regular basis but what about Cal? We don't discuss him too much. Can anyone give any insight on Cal McNair?
 
They have almost reached our level.... burn.

He mentions Cal in this article as a person who he gives a lot of weight to. We blast McNair, Smith and Kubiak on a regular basis but what about Cal? We don't discuss him too much. Can anyone give any insight on Cal McNair?

Nepotism appears to be alive and well.
 
Wow, that was a great read! A few tidbits I thought was interesting...

We have one of the best quarterbacks (Matt Schuab), the best wide receiver (Andre Johnson), a fine tight end (Owen Daniels), solid offensive linemen ... We'll pick up a running back or two in the draft to solidify our running game

Pretty much telling us again what we will be drafting. Look for Mathews in the first or Tate in the 2nd. Solid OL?

Then I meet with Gary and Rick and Cal. The four of us talk about the game and express ideas and talk offense, defense and special teams. We go down the list and talk about every player. When I am here, I try to go to practice every day. I'm involved. I'm not the coach and I'm not the GM; I have one of each. But I'm involved enough to monitor what is going on. If you are not there, you cannot see people in action. You can't evaluate based on what you've heard.''

You can bet that he has heard the Coaches opinion and GM's and Scout's and is relating the overall ideas that we need a RB! Maybe 2.

I want to bring a championship here. Bringing NFL football back was not enough. Who knows? I look at what the New Orleans Saints just did and I believe that can happen for us. This might be our year. I always try to figure out how to add value. How do we get to be a championship team? That's adding value. And you do it with stable coaching, stable ownership.''


For the bashers that keep saying he is just in it for the money. Listen to the Man! I believe he means what he says and is committed to bringing and NFL championship to Houston. I love the fact that someone would do this for the sports fans of Houston, even if he does line his own pockets be doing so.

Afterall, I watched the Oilers and Fud McDouche since their inception. I have seen an owner that had no interest in the fans or in winning a title, other than the money it would bring him.

On the Cowboys' glitzy new stadium and Dallas hosting the next Super Bowl: "They have almost reached our level.''

:lol:
 
they have almost reached our level what does that mean

Texans do got a world class stadium and facilites along with a Pitsburg/old school denver runed team i guess thats what he ment
 
Great article CNNND! Thanks for posting it.

As for McNair, I still am grateful he brought back the NFL to Houston. Maybe things haven't gone as fast as some would like but I don't think we could ask for a better owner. That's probably the best thing about the Oilers leaving, we don't have to deal with bud anymore! McNair has faaaaaaaar more class than ole bud could ever dream of having, and I believe he has more common sense too. I personally like the way he is building the team and think he has the right Coach and GM for the job. Has everything gone perfectly? No! But that's just part of learning and growing like he said. I do believe he, the team and the fans will be rewarded with a championship in the near future. JMHO! :texflag:
 
I think McNair is a great owner and he will be a winner sooner rather than later. I honestly do think the Texans right now are a better organization than the Oilers ever were. It's good to be a fan of a team with such great ownership. Now if only he would buy the Astros.
 
On the 2010 season: "We've got to start out without digging ourselves into a hole -- [play] good football the first half of the year and not wait until the second half. A little luck and we are in the playoffs. If Indianapolis plays its starters the whole game against the Jets, they win and we were in the playoffs instead of the Jets. Breaks and luck. You need a little. But what you want to do is put yourself in a place where luck runs over you. I'm optimistic. This could be the year for us. I do what I've always done -- hope for the best and prepare for the worst.''
(from the link)
Mr McNair, we had a chance to take care of the Jets in our season-opener in
Reliant instead of needing help from another team, and who didn't have his team ready for that game ?
And who had a record in his own division last year of 1-5 ?
 
On the 2010 season: "We've got to start out without digging ourselves into a hole -- [play] good football the first half of the year and not wait until the second half. A little luck and we are in the playoffs. If Indianapolis plays its starters the whole game against the Jets, they win and we were in the playoffs instead of the Jets. Breaks and luck. You need a little. But what you want to do is put yourself in a place where luck runs over you. I'm optimistic. This could be the year for us. I do what I've always done -- hope for the best and prepare for the worst.''
(from the link)
Mr McNair, we had a chance to take care of the Jets in our season-opener in
Reliant instead of needing help from another team, and who didn't have his team ready for that game ?
And who had a record in his own division last year of 1-5 ?

McNair doesn't let petulant little facts get in the way of great lip service.

McNair likes Kubes, McNair likes K.Brown, They get to keep they're jobs regardless of their performance.

With the $ McNair is making why wouldn't they get to keep their jobs.
 
On the 2010 season:
"We've got to start out without digging ourselves into a hole -- [play] good football the first half of the year and not wait until the second half.

I think he addressed the losing to NYJ part right there.

A little luck and we are in the playoffs. If Indianapolis plays its starters the whole game against the Jets, they win and we were in the playoffs instead of the Jets. Breaks and luck. You need a little. But what you want to do is put yourself in a place where luck runs over you.
Call me crazy but that sounds to me like he's saying we have to make it happen by winning more of our own games.

He did mention that we've had to overcome some adversity and the point of the article was to talk about how we've had alot of new things (OCs, and DCs and HC) over the last few years and the only way to make this thing work is to give everyone their chance to prove themselves.
 
Why did they have to overcome this adversity?

Having rookies at key positions in the organization was McNair's choice.

Why did he choose to bring this adversity on himself and the organization. Hiring rookies basically says the organization is willing to go through a 4/5 yr learning curve.

This is why teams usually hire vets like Parcells or Holmgren to run their organization. Proven winners that know how to set up and run an organization.

After 4 yrs we still dont know if Smithiak can build a championship organization. Cleveland knows that within 5 yrs they will have a winning organization.

McNair took/is still taking a huge risk on the Smithiak regime. If they fall on their face this year and with this years schedule it's possible this could happen, where does McNair turn then?
 
I like the way McNair is running this organization. He's said from the start he knew that while this is a footall organization it basically boils down to that this is an entertainment company. Obviously winning is a huge part building and sustaining a fanbase, but he looked at it like any other entertainment company and focused on the fans. If the fans don't have a good time, they're not going to come back. This includes hiring the Disney people to come in and train all the service staff, making the corridors in Reliant wider than required to ease walking traffic, and hiring extra police personnel outside of stadium grounds to help with traffic flow leaving the stadium. He says if your stuck in your car for an hour and a half or more like at other stadiums, the fan's last impression of the experience was negative and their not going to want to come back- it leaves a bad taste in your mouth. There's a lot that goes on behind the scenes that makes me love how the Texans are run. Going the extra mile to do it the right way. Now all's we's needs is to get ourselves a perrenial playoff team and we'll be set. :fingergun:
 
I liked the guy who wrote the comment at the end -

I'm 63 and my family has been part of the NFL for the last 55 years, including yuears my dad was elected into the NFL Hall of Fame. Never do I remember reading quotes spoken by an NFL owner that were as intelligent, aware and involved as those spoken by Mr. McNair. Houston--you are one lucky city and I wish you and your team the best of luck. You have finally risen above any residual effects left by that slimy, loud mouth, egotistical, obnoxious, stupid, disloyal scumbag owner you had previously:
Bud Ass. Tard. Adams

:bravo:
 
I like the way McNair is running this organization. He's said from the start he knew that while this is a footall organization it basically boils down to that this is an entertainment company. Obviously winning is a huge part building and sustaining a fanbase, but he looked at it like any other entertainment company and focused on the fans. If the fans don't have a good time, they're not going to come back. This includes hiring the Disney people to come in and train all the service staff, making the corridors in Reliant wider than required to ease walking traffic, and hiring extra police personnel outside of stadium grounds to help with traffic flow leaving the stadium. He says if your stuck in your car for an hour and a half or more like at other stadiums, the fan's last impression of the experience was negative and their not going to want to come back- it leaves a bad taste in your mouth. There's a lot that goes on behind the scenes that makes me love how the Texans are run. Going the extra mile to do it the right way. Now all's we's needs is to get ourselves a perrenial playoff team and we'll be set. :fingergun:

All of this stuff is nice and everything but I would trade all of it in for a playoff team/SB winner.

It's pathetic that after 8 yrs we are still judged by the fan experience rather than the product/results on the field. IMHO
 
I liked the guy who wrote the comment at the end -

I'm 63 and my family has been part of the NFL for the last 55 years, including yuears my dad was elected into the NFL Hall of Fame. Never do I remember reading quotes spoken by an NFL owner that were as intelligent, aware and involved as those spoken by Mr. McNair. Houston--you are one lucky city and I wish you and your team the best of luck. You have finally risen above any residual effects left by that slimy, loud mouth, egotistical, obnoxious, stupid, disloyal scumbag owner you had previously:
Bud Ass. Tard. Adams

:bravo:

If you hadn't given the age I would've wondered if this was Bruce Matthews. Ha Ha Ha
 
You really are bitter aren't you? Like McNair has set a precedent by involving family members. :rolleyes:

No, he just asked for insight on Cal and his qualifications for his position in the organization. I gave my opinion. I'm certianly not bitter and could careless who Bob gets to run the organization.

I just want to see the results/wins.

Nepotism runs deep in the NFL. Jones/Wilf/York/Mara etc...

If the tax structure is set up right a NFL team can be passed down from generation to generation.

I'm interested to see when Jerry turns the Cowboys over to Stephen.

Or to whom the McCaskey's leave the Bears.
 
"We'll pick up a running back or two in the draft to solidify our running game."

I pray it's two...maybe Ryan Mathews and Lonyae Miller late???? Blount????
 
"We'll pick up a running back or two in the draft to solidify our running game."

I pray it's two...maybe Ryan Mathews and Lonyae Miller late???? Blount????

Might want to translate that to we'll pick up a running back or two from the draft eligible players. Draft one, pick up another one or two UDFAs.
 
All of this stuff is nice and everything but I would trade all of it in for a playoff team/SB winner.

It's pathetic that after 8 yrs we are still judged by the fan experience rather than the product/results on the field. IMHO
I hear you loud and clear and completely concur. I don't want this to be an excuse because it's not, but the league really did change up the rules on us vs. previous expansion teams. Again, that's not an excuse because I'm not confident that Casserly would have done anything constructive with those extra picks!

I think we just had the wrong people running this team during the 1st four years, that's evident. Kubiak wasn't ready the first go around but McNair felt confident in him 4 years later. He even went into the new hire giving Kubes some grace period b/c (i) the team needed completely rebuilding and (ii) GK was learning as a 1st time head coach.

Would I have loved it if the Texans had made the playoffs? Of course, but I don't want to be some one and done team and then go on a couple more years before we make the wild card again. I think I'm a "homer" b/c I really do like the way McNair is sticking with Kubiak/Smith, having continuity, solid respected people, and building this thing for long term success. I think we're really heading in the right direction and once we're there, we're there for a long time. But I can't argue against the fact that it would be so much better if after 8 years we were there. We need to be in the playoffs, we should be in the playoffs, and yet I'm still "hoping" next year is the year. :choke:

You really are bitter aren't you? Like McNair has set a precedent by involving family members. :rolleyes:
I thought he was referring to the Cal questions as "Another guys we can blame!!!". haha
 
I can't decide what's more stunning--McNair's frank honesty and detailed answers or the fact that NFL Fanhouse schooled every Houston media outlet with this story.

Incredible interview. My mouth was agape as I read McNair's comments, especially his spot-on assessment of David Carr and his acknowledgment of the Things Gone Wrong.

If I was ever unconvinced that the current front office has what it takes to bring an NFL winner to Houston, I'm not right now. Bob McNair exudes confidence and leadership. I am pumped for the future of this organization.
 
Spin spin spin

kubiak is .500 as a head coach
mcnair sure has a lot of confidence for a .500 coach

sounds like .500 is enough to keep your job
they better take a step forward this year
or heads should roll. 1-5 in division is pathetic
and the one win was giftwrapped by Collins unforced fumble
1-5 gets you an extension

kinda pathetic. Kubes didn't deserve a new deal
not at all.. But he is a local 'legend' and inexpensive so alls good
turnstiles still turning
$8 beers still flowing
 
Spin spin spin

kubiak is .500 as a head coach
mcnair sure has a lot of confidence for a .500 coach

sounds like .500 is enough to keep your job
they better take a step forward this year
or heads should roll. 1-5 in division is pathetic
and the one win was giftwrapped by Collins unforced fumble
1-5 gets you an extension

kinda pathetic. Kubes didn't deserve a new deal
not at all.. But he is a local 'legend' and inexpensive so alls good
turnstiles still turning
$8 beers still flowing

Sounds like Bob McNair is a better judge of Kubiak's job performance than the short-sighted bottom-liners who refuse to acknowledge the full set of circumstances Kubiak was working under and the breaks that didn't go the Texans' way.

"I really thought we'd be in position last year to make the playoffs, but I never indicated if we didn't we were going to change the coaching staff,'' McNair said. "People thought that's what I might do, but I didn't say that. I evaluate and make decisions. It wasn't about being 9-7 like we were, because we could have been 8-8 or 10-6 and I still would have looked at injuries, the opponents ... so much plays into it. Under the circumstances, [Kubiak] did a good job.

"We've been working here in recent years with rookies in place at head coach, general manager, offensive coordinator and defensive coordinator. You have to give them time. As an owner, I want things that last over the long course. I do not believe in giving them experience and then sending them off for someone else to get the benefit.''

Amen to that.
 
Spin spin spin

kubiak is .500 as a head coach
mcnair sure has a lot of confidence for a .500 coach

sounds like .500 is enough to keep your job
they better take a step forward this year
or heads should roll. 1-5 in division is pathetic
and the one win was giftwrapped by Collins unforced fumble
1-5 gets you an extension

kinda pathetic. Kubes didn't deserve a new deal
not at all.. But he is a local 'legend' and inexpensive so alls good
turnstiles still turning
$8 beers still flowing

SH: Quit giving facts supported by cold hard numbers. You're going to get the koolaid drinkers all riled up.

LOL
 
SH: Quit giving facts supported by cold hard numbers. You're going to get the koolaid drinkers all riled up.

LOL

This is STOOPID.

Anyone can look at a coach's record and make determinations based solely upon that. The wise critic looks beyond the record and into the whos, hows, and whys.
 
This is STOOPID.

Anyone can look at a coach's record and make determinations based solely upon that. The wise critic looks beyond the record and into the whos, hows, and whys.

How are you judged at your job?

After 3 yrs I would hope it would be by production.

If your company isn't judging you by wether you are producing or not they are STOOPID.
 
How are you judged at your job?

After 3 yrs I would hope it would be by production.

If your company isn't judging you by wether you are producing or not they are STOOPID.

The problem is quantifying production. Is it really just about wins and losses and playoff appearances? McNair doesn't necessarily think so, and I agree with him. I guess you think Eric Mangini is a better coach than Gary Kubiak.
 
The only thing that matters in sports is winning. You can have the best fans, the nicest stadium, the greatest parking, the hottest cheerleaders, the best pep band and if you don't win it's all just show. Period.
 
This is STOOPID.

Anyone can look at a coach's record and make determinations based solely upon that. The wise critic looks beyond the record and into the whos, hows, and whys.

Your first mistake: arguing with self-indulgent dolts.

Your second mistake: using common sense.
 
Last edited:
The only thing that matters in sports is winning. You can have the best fans, the nicest stadium, the greatest parking, the hottest cheerleaders, the best pep band and if you don't win it's all just show. Period.

Correct, but there are multiple moving parts involved in building a winner. By the bottom-liner logic, there are 31 failures every year in the NFL. Should coaches be fired for not winning the Super Bowl? And if not, then how are we to define "winning." Is it nine wins? Is it a playoff appearance? Is it multiple playoff appearances? Is it a playoff win? Or is it a conference championship appearance? Any definition of winning that falls short of a Super Bowl victory admits the concessions I'm referring to. At some point you have to allow for more than just the bottom line, and that means a detailed thought process of judging a coach's job performance. As that interview makes clear, Bob McNair cannot be accused of not giving a thoughtful, thorough, and analytical assessment of Gary Kubiak's leadership.
 
This is STOOPID.

Anyone can look at a coach's record and make determinations based solely upon that. The wise critic looks beyond the record and into the whos, hows, and whys.

so the wise critic looks beyond the record and looks for excuses?

injuries happen and we had no more than the average NFL team
if you have rookies at important coaching positions, THAT IS ON YOU!!

basically when the Texans screw up, there is always someone just too eager to make excuses

btw thanks for the namecalling TB
but I understand. Truth hurts sometimes. You are forgiven

bottom line is .500 over a 4 year span
horrible divisional record
horrible record against good teams
never show up in the big games that matter (i.e. divisional most of the time)

the wise critic....what a load of bs. you are what you are. .500 and getting extended

but he wasn't expensive and he is a good ole local 'legend'...whoopty freaking doo
 
so the wise critic looks beyond the record and looks for excuses?

injuries happen and we had no more than the average NFL team
if you have rookies at important coaching positions, THAT IS ON YOU!!

basically when the Texans screw up, there is always someone just too eager to make excuses

bottom line is .500 over a 4 year span
horrible divisional record
horrible record against good teams
never show up in the big games that matter (i.e. divisional most of the time)

the wise critic....what a load of bs. you are what you are. .500 and getting extended

but he wasn't expensive and he is a good ole local 'legend'...whoopty freaking doo

Ruh roh, looks like the petulant table-pounder is at it again!
 
"We've been working here in recent years with rookies in place at head coach, general manager, offensive coordinator and defensive coordinator. You have to give them time. As an owner, I want things that last over the long course. I do not believe in giving them experience and then sending them off for someone else to get the benefit.''

This is a very smart man.
 
I thought that was verbotten on this MB!

Why did McNair put himself through all of the growing pains of hiring all 1st timers GM?HC. Knowing that it would take 4 or 5 yrs for them to hopefully become upper echelon type guys? Instead of hiring a Parcells type guy?

1.They could market the legend comes home (Kubes) after the 2-14 debacle. Marketing was and still is a priorty. I dont blame McNair for this angle. I would've done the same thing. If I was in his shoes.

After a 2-14 season the marketing team needed all of the help it could get.

2. McNair put down a good chunk of his fortune to buy this team. Casserly burned McNair when he had an open checkbook policy at the franchises inception. McNair recouped some of his money by hiring a bunch of rookies. (Smithiak,Coaching staff)

What I dont understand is why McNair reupped Kubes and his medicore record. I think it was because McNair regards Kubes like he did HWNSNBM) loyalty to a fault in this case. IMHO
 
Why did McNair put himself through all of the growing pains of hiring all 1st timers GM?HC. Knowing that it would take 4 or 5 yrs for them to hopefully become upper echelon type guys? Instead of hiring a Parcells type guy?

:spit: Because the first 4 or 5 years with experienced guys didn't work out so well?? :thinking:

:fingergun:
 
I don't think they're so much as excuses as they are mitigating factors. You have those in any line of business. i.e. the economy would be a mitigating factor as to why a salesman's sales were down. So if he didn't get the revenue you wanted and you fired him, you're going to have to hire somebody else, get him used to the company, fellow employees, product, etc. Or hire him/someone when the economy picks back up - trouble is your competition may have already snatched him up and you're stuck with product waiting to be sold and nobody sell it.

McNair believes that Kubiak is the man for the job, the guy that can lead this team deep into the playoffs. Some disagree, with good reason. Sometimes you just look at the historical results - .500 coach, you want better so you fire him. The difference is, McNair likes the progress the team has shown, the personnel that is in place, the transition of old coaches out and new ones in. I think just as importantly, he thinks the Texans have a better shot of winning going forward with Kubiak in place than they do if they fired him and had to hire a new coach who would then take a couple years to get "his" coaches in place. Even if the system/players stay the same, there's going to be coaching turnover.

The bottom line is McNair thinks going forward, Kubiak is the quickest way to get this city a winner. The points about past record, division record, etc. are critical but absolutely warranted. The question is, will changing coaches right now make us a winner quicker. Some think yes, some think no. If it's my money... I'm sticking with the guys I've got with Kubiak, Smith, Bush, etc. You may think differently, you're free to, I don't think its dumb/stupid... I get your reasoning but I see it a different way.
 
Why did McNair put himself through all of the growing pains of hiring all 1st timers GM?HC. Knowing that it would take 4 or 5 yrs for them to hopefully become upper echelon type guys? Instead of hiring a Parcells type guy?

1.They could market the legend comes home (Kubes) after the 2-14 debacle. Marketing was and still is a priorty. I dont blame McNair for this angle. I would've done the same thing. If I was in his shoes.

After a 2-14 season the marketing team needed all of the help it could get.

2. McNair put down a good chunk of his fortune to buy this team. Casserly burned McNair when he had an open checkbook policy at the franchises inception. McNair recouped some of his money by hiring a bunch of rookies. (Smithiak,Coaching staff)

What I dont understand is why McNair reupped Kubes and his medicore record. I think it was because McNair regards Kubes like he did HWNSNBM) loyalty to a fault in this case. IMHO

I thought he explained very well why he did a new contract with Kubiak.
 
Why did McNair put himself through all of the growing pains of hiring all 1st timers GM?HC. Knowing that it would take 4 or 5 yrs for them to hopefully become upper echelon type guys? Instead of hiring a Parcells type guy?

How many Parcells-type guys take over a fledgling expansion team coming off a 2-14 season? Wasn't Dom Capers highly regarded when McNair hired him?

What I dont understand is why McNair reupped Kubes and his medicore record. I think it was because McNair regards Kubes like he did HWNSNBM) loyalty to a fault in this case. IMHO

Or he sees a good coach on the verge of becoming a very good coach and doesn't want to start the whole process all over again.
 
If the Texans regress next year then fine. Say whatever you want. But until next year is played out... its kind of all premature imo.

Lets put Kubiaks coaching in terms of wins into a line graph. 6, 8, 8, and now 9. Is the arrow pointed up? Lets just pretend the Texans win 10 or more games next year. Then how does the line graph look? Totally acceptable and seemingly set for steady success thereafter? Damn sure thats how it would look to me and would prove everything he is saying about building through the draft for long term success. So lets see where 2010 takes us.
 
What I dont understand is why McNair reupped Kubes and his medicore record. I think it was because McNair regards Kubes like he did HWNSNBM) loyalty to a fault in this case. IMHO
Because the HC isn't the only guy. In order to get quality coaches and assistants, you're going to have to convince them that they will be given the opportunity to succeed and will be able to work with the people that hired them. Re-signing Kubiak showed the soon-to-be hired (Dennison) and other potential candidates to upgrade your staff, that you are fully committed to to the men in charge. If the wheels fall off, McNair can always fire the entire staff (with no effect to the cap) and hire new. But in the meantime, you gotta show that you're committed to sticking with your guys b/c if you fire your HC every 4 years... you're not going to attract very many quality coaches or assistants. It's much easier to recruit a quality assistant if he sees the front office/management believing in whats going on in the organization instead of scrapping it.
 
I don't think they're so much as excuses as they are mitigating factors. You have those in any line of business. i.e. the economy would be a mitigating factor as to why a salesman's sales were down. So if he didn't get the revenue you wanted and you fired him, you're going to have to hire somebody else, get him used to the company, fellow employees, product, etc. Or hire him/someone when the economy picks back up - trouble is your competition may have already snatched him up and you're stuck with product waiting to be sold and nobody sell it.

McNair believes that Kubiak is the man for the job, the guy that can lead this team deep into the playoffs. Some disagree, with good reason. Sometimes you just look at the historical results - .500 coach, you want better so you fire him. The difference is, McNair likes the progress the team has shown, the personnel that is in place, the transition of old coaches out and new ones in. I think just as importantly, he thinks the Texans have a better shot of winning going forward with Kubiak in place than they do if they fired him and had to hire a new coach who would then take a couple years to get "his" coaches in place. Even if the system/players stay the same, there's going to be coaching turnover.

The bottom line is McNair thinks going forward, Kubiak is the quickest way to get this city a winner. The points about past record, division record, etc. are critical but absolutely warranted. The question is, will changing coaches right now make us a winner quicker. Some think yes, some think no. If it's my money... I'm sticking with the guys I've got with Kubiak, Smith, Bush, etc. You may think differently, you're free to, I don't think its dumb/stupid... I get your reasoning but I see it a different way.

Well thought out, Great post

Repped
 
Nepotism appears to be alive and well.

You could say the same about the Redskins for hiring Kyle Shanahan.

I don't really see what the big deal is, if I were running a business like the NFL I would want people around me that I know I can trust. It's not like his brother is an artist with no knowledge of football and placing him in the role of the head coach.
 
Because the HC isn't the only guy. In order to get quality coaches and assistants, you're going to have to convince them that they will be given the opportunity to succeed and will be able to work with the people that hired them. Re-signing Kubiak showed the soon-to-be hired (Dennison) and other potential candidates to upgrade your staff, that you are fully committed to to the men in charge. If the wheels fall off, McNair can always fire the entire staff (with no effect to the cap) and hire new. But in the meantime, you gotta show that you're committed to sticking with your guys b/c if you fire your HC every 4 years... you're not going to attract very many quality coaches or assistants. It's much easier to recruit a quality assistant if he sees the front office/management believing in whats going on in the organization instead of scrapping it.

What is the average logevity of a HC with one team in the NFL?

Dont know this answer but it would give insight into how McNair thinks.

McNair is probably a guy who doesn't like change. He only makes changes if not making a change is going to cost him money.
 
No, he just asked for insight on Cal and his qualifications for his position in the organization. I gave my opinion. I'm certianly not bitter and could careless who Bob gets to run the organization.

I just want to see the results/wins.

Nepotism runs deep in the NFL. Jones/Wilf/York/Mara etc...

If the tax structure is set up right a NFL team can be passed down from generation to generation.

I'm interested to see when Jerry turns the Cowboys over to Stephen.

Or to whom the McCaskey's leave the Bears.
Well, thank you for your input. I do appreciate it. It just wasn't the answer I was looking for. Qualifications, experience, respect league-wise and whatnot. That kind of question...
 
You could say the same about the Redskins for hiring Kyle Shanahan.

I don't really see what the big deal is, if I were running a business like the NFL I would want people around me that I know I can trust. It's not like his brother is an artist with no knowledge of football and placing him in the role of the head coach.

Just a comment not an indictment.

I was just answering a question.
 
Back
Top