From MSN:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16384613/
Cant say I agree with all that. The guy who wrote this doesnt strike me as real football saavy either.
Here is a look at how the rookie class of 2006 performed. They are classified as The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. The first two are self-explanatory. In the case of The Ugly, it may not mean a coach is doing a horrible job, simply that what he produced isnt pretty to look at. Some among The Ugly might someday find themselves among The Good. Of course, they could also find themselves on the unemployment line:
THE BAD:
GARY KUBIAK, HOUSTON TEXANS: Its hard to blame Kubiak completely for the sorry state of these Lone Star losers. No matter how much they deny it, the Texans took Mario Williams, who will go down in NFL history as an ordinary defensive player and thats if everything goes well because they didnt want to meet the contract demands of Reggie Bushs representatives. Thats just one example of their flawed decision-making.
But Kubiak has enough talent in the fold that the Texans should be better than they are. Several of the teams losses have been one-sided and ghastly a 40-7 pulverizing at New England, a 34-6 whipping at Dallas, to name just two. Thats an example of a team that doesnt yet know how to compete, or doesnt believe it can, and thats a direct reflection on coaching.
The Texans are currently 24th in total defense and 28th in total offense. And quarterback David Carr, while having a decent year, is not much better than he was before Kubiak got there. Carr has thrown as many TDs as INTs (11) and has been sacked 40 times.
Kubiak may not stay around long enough to finish this job, because this job may not be finished for a long, long time.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16384613/
Cant say I agree with all that. The guy who wrote this doesnt strike me as real football saavy either.