Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
no it looked like a catch to me, just bad pressure
I thought his hand touched out of bounds before he go two feet inbounds. What do you guys think?
as long as the ball doesnt hit the ground and the feet drag inbounds....which is what happened. the tv announcers said it was obvious, and it looked that way to me.
It shoudn't have come down to this one play.
No excuses, shouldn't have let him be open behind everyone.
I see skid marks that start on the chalk. If his feet drag the ground, it makes a skind mark. You can see it on the replay: No skid marks inside the end zone area, they begin on the chalk and then continue for a foot or two out of bounds.
Check out the Chronicle, they have a picture of the catch. Looks like the hand is touching out of bounds at the exact moment both feet are touching the end zone.
It shoudn't have come down to this one play.
I have paused and slowed down every angle available, and I cannott see the drag marks of the right foot in the endzone. I can even see a spot where it looks like it started in the white about 2" or so in. Im gonna have to ask my neighbor who works for the field crew if he saw the marks or not.
Doesnt matter really...the call on the field seems to be standing more this season.
It doesnt matter. If you cant tell in slow motion then the refs cant tell either.
That is why the call stands. There is nothing indisputable.
I have paused and slowed down every angle available, and I cannott see the drag marks of the right foot in the endzone.
Look at the still picture shown in the link on post 19 of this thread. It clearly shows both feet on the ground a couple of feet before the end line.
IMO I didn't think he got that right foot down because it looked like that foot didn't kick grass til it got to the white but if it was AJ I would have wanted that call because that was too close to overturn.
Where was the pressure at the end? NON-EXISTENT
I really think his feet were down in the field of play.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/4347524.html
Watch it again. His foot bounced, that's why the mark starts on the chalk. I hate to say it and looked at it every other way, but it was a good catch. Or def just blew it.
I won't/can't deny he dragged his feet...look at his frikn hand...it's firmly flattened onto to the ground...OUT OF BOUNDS!....show me another picture where his hand is still in the air and his feet are dragging and I will happily call it a TD.
People still argue about it after the picture.
Well now the story is changing. Many posters were adamant his right foot never touched. The picture showed it did.
So now we are on to "the hand was down first". If a picture disproves that, what's next? He was juggling the ball?
We got beat. It happens, even to the mighty Texans.
I repped YLY who looked at the picture and said essentially, "I was wrong, the foot was down". Imagine that - looking at new evidence and changing an opinion.
I've never changed my story ... I've never said he didn't get his feet in.
his feet were not in bounds...
From the game thread:
I understand that the picture doesn't show if the hand or feet were down first. That wasn't the question that particular picture answered.