That's totally fair, and no worries.
My point was just that there really isn't a school with a conveyor belt of top end QBs tumbling off of it. In fact if you look up and down anyone's greatest QBs of all time list and you looked at what school they came from you'd be looking for a serious other minute and squinting your eyes to find the next best one.
Further that, would you have drafted Tom Brady? How 'bout Aaron Rodgers or Pat Mahomes? Because Michigan, Cal, and Tex Tech had the square root of absolutely squat before them.
You don't, IMO, scout the school, you scout the player. The exception to this is if the school has some gimmicky system that has a challenging translation to the pros. An example of that I'd give this year is Hendon Hooker. Lots of things to like certainly, but the system Josh Heupel has put together is night and day different than anything he'll be asked to do at the next level. But ya, other than that school means nada. Physical attributes, transferable traits/skills, maturity, processing, passion for the mission. Those are your objective finds, again imo. And they're by and large independent as all get out from alma mater.