Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

What's your plan for QB next season?

In your scenario this team should just totally handicap the coaching staff going into next season and tank for the year since anyone knows who has followed this team that they can't win with what they have right now. They have to make changes at the QB position. They have to get new guys in there to compete. They can't just totally ignore that position and make their players believe that they're trying to win a championship. If that were to be the plan, then we might as well trade Watt and Clowney both now and get a ton of picks and rebuild.
I'm still on the Savage bandwagon. A bit concerned with injuries but not enough to trade for another unproven Brady backup. If they do it, I'll still like Savage but, as always, I'll be pulling for the best player to win the starting job.
 
The price tag would be the highest that they could get. They'd likely go out and make him available to other teams and see what is offered. Either that or they'd have their guys reach out to certain GM's that they'd likely want him to be traded to and see what type of value they can get. A 1st and a 4th at a minimum is a pretty easy marker to go by based on that last year's trade with Bradford, and they know it. Other teams know it. You know it. His value will be greater than what Bradford's would have been in any year if he becomes available. You keep making this so complex when it really isn't. Its actually very simple.

I don't know that that's their minimum. No one does.

That's as complex as I've made this.
 
I hear you about about the bolded, but it begs the question: why are you still here? That's an honest question, not being snarky. If you feel that strongly about it why not pick a new team?

I'm specifically speaking of QB's. This team would be better served if they showed some patience with the QB's on the roster instead of getting Brady backups every off season in the hopes that the backup acquired Brady's talent through osmosis or something.

Unless you have a specific QB targeted in the draft and why you would target him, please spare me the "draft a QB in rounds 1-3" line. This draft is not a good draft for the position.
There will be at least 3 that will have a better career than Osweiler.

There might be a dozen or more that are better QB prospects, but may never get to play much, if at all, in the NFL; some simply because they don't have the size, the arm strength... or "the look".

:kitten::ahhaha:
 
There will be at least 3 that should have a better career than Osweiler.

There might be a dozen or more that are better QB prospects, but may never get to play much, if at all, in the NFL; some simply because they don't have the size, the arm strength... or "the look".

:kitten::ahhaha:
FIFY...:D
 
I hear you about about the bolded, but it begs the question: why are you still here? That's an honest question, not being snarky. If you feel that strongly about it why not pick a new team?

I'm specifically speaking of QB's. This team would be better served if they showed some patience with the QB's on the roster instead of getting Brady backups every off season in the hopes that the backup acquired Brady's talent through osmosis or something.

Unless you have a specific QB targeted in the draft and why you would target him, please spare me the "draft a QB in rounds 1-3" line. This draft is not a good draft for the position.

I love football and have always supported Houston teams in all sports. There are 2 reasons I keep my tickets. 1. $5,000 in PSL $$$$ and 2. My wife loves going to the gmes, it keeps her interesed in football which allows me to watch as much football as I want without any blow back. This is priceless. She's even enjoying a FF league that I talked her into joining.

As for the QB position, I wanted Ricky to draft Jimmy G instead of XSF. I dont look at him as just another Pats backup QB. He's really talented. If they dont trade for Jimmy G, which they wont. Then my plan B would be to sign Cutler after he's released to a 1-2 yr deal and draft Mahomes. I would carry 4 QB's next yr, 1. Cutler 2. Savage 3. Mahomes 4. Os who would be a sunk cost and would never play another down for the Texans. Keeping Os would save 6 mil that would be appropriated towards signing Cutler. The cost of this is Os taking up a roster spot.

Do I think any of this will happen? After listening to Little Ricky McNair talk about how Os was a rookie last yr, the answer is no, it will never happen. Why? because the Texans org is unwilling to admit that signing Os was a mistake and move on. McNair has basically said the same thing. It's the company line in regards to Os. BOB is the only person in the org not to fall into the company line in regards to Os this offseason.
 
Last edited:
Go watch some Texans tape then. He holds the ball low, which makes his release slightly slower. It may only amount to a .1 second difference in throwing, but that can make a difference when the entire throwing motion takes less than a second. The guy is going into his 6th year in the NFL, and hasn't picked up on the fact that QBs should hold the ball high to make a faster release. Little things add up in the NFL. Bright side is that is coachable.

When I look at guys coming out of college that is one of the things I look for. However, in the pros QBs don't hold it as high as I think they should... for the reason you pointed out & ball security.

Personally I think it's a negative mark for someone as inexperienced as Osweiler to already be dropping his hold point, but, he doesn't hold it as low as many. It is a positive mark, in my mind, that Peyton still holds the ball the way he was taught to.

Everytime I criticize college QBs for holding the ball low, someone retorts with this guy

320x486.jpg
 
4. Os who would be a sunk cost and would never play another down for the Texans. Keeping Os would save 6 mil that would be appropriated towards signing Cutler. The cost of this is Os taking up a roster spot.

It's been stated that they can designate Osweiler a June 1st cut. It would be a net savings of 0 dollars on the 2017 cap & effectively save us $15M on the 2018 cap.

That way he won't even cost us a roster spot.
 
I still think that the Pats don't have complete leverage. I think the high end of what they can get is the browns 13th pick and another mid rounder, they seem to be only team that is desperate and not so smart. The Pats have to trade him this year or either Franchise him next year or let him walk. Teams can wait out the situation to a certain extent, plus its doubtful they would trade him to a good team in conference, so X HOU, DEN, KC so their are only a handful of teams, add in the fact that teams that really bad CLE, SF, LAR, CHI, have a lot of holes to fill, teams on the verge of being a SB caliber teams are more likely to give up alot, but then they don't have as good of a 1st. Arizona maybe if Palmer retires. Also bad teams know they will be bad next year, they have the option to just wait till next years QB's, who they can keep under control for cheap for 4 years. Its not like this guy in the only option especially if you are building for the future. Yes the guy looked good, but it was only 1.5 games. He's not proven, he's not some can't miss uber talented prospect, also he seemed to not protect himself and got injured in his second game. These are reasons to not overpay for him. LAR already have a young qb, so it would then be between CLE, SF,CHI, and possibly ARZ. So the market is not as big, and these teams have options. I think CLE is the best fit, if they want to get the full asking price there are not many more places that make a lot of sense.
 
Last edited:
I don't get the whole "if you don't like it, why are you still here? Why don't you just pick a new team?"

The only reason I halfway care about the Texans is because I just happen to live in Houston. If I moved to another city, I wouldn't give a flip about them. This is why I never understood all the residual Titans' fans in Houston after they moved. If where I moved had an NFL team then I would start following them. I have no vested interest in the Texans and stand to gain no financial windfall from them, win or lose. I follow them because it's (literally) the only game in town. What fun would it be to just randomly pick another team in another city and declare, "I'm a Brown's fan now, By Gawd!"?
 
Per Walter Football Rumor Mill

One team that has been rumored to be in the market for trading for Garoppolo is the Houston Texans. However, in speaking with Texans sources, that is very unlikely. Houston doesn't sound willing to be interested in dealing the necessary picks for Garoppolo. The Texans are definitely in the market to add talent to their quarterback competition, but they are more likely to select a signal-caller in the early rounds of the 2017 NFL Draft.

According to sources, if the Texans do acquire a veteran, it would probably be a free agent like Jay Cutler or Tony Romo if they were released and willing to take a cheap contract. The Texans are the only playoff team in the market for a starting quarterback, so if either Cutler or Romo wants a shot to win before the end of their careers, Houston could be their best opportunity. The Texans won't be able to offer a big contract for either veteran because of the money taken up by Brock Osweiler. Thus, the most likely move will be taking a quarterback prospect with one of their early picks in the 2017 NFL Draft.
 
You lost yourself completely when you blew off Garrapolo and then tried to use Schaub as an okay example. Schaub had barely more experience as a starter than Jimmy did, and didn't look as good as Jimmy has either. But that was okay then too? Coming right after you tried justifying the Bradford trade? Lol! Come on man. Vikings were morons for that, and they didn't get any better which is what several of us stated then too. The Vikings dealt with what teams deal with every season when their QB goes down for the season. THey don't all run out in total desperation mode and give up a 1st and a 4th for some guy that has a pretty poor history as a starter. Pretty much no logic in that at all.
You completely missed the point of that post. The point of that post was to illustrate that we aren't desperate like the Vikings were when they lost their starter the week before the regular season started. In order to keep their playoff hopes alive, they wanted an experienced starter so they HAD to pay a ransom.
Or are you telling me they would have been better off just rolling with 37-yr old Shaun Hill?

The Texans aren't desperate like that at all. So why should we pay a ransom in draft picks?? I don't have anything against going for Garoppolo if that's what O'Brien wants to do. I just think we shouldn't do what you said was dumb, overpay. Like some say we did for Osweiler

There's no rush. We still have Savage and Osweiler who have had time in this system. Why not give one of those guys a 2nd year in this system and use those picks to build the team around the starter?
 
I don't get the whole "if you don't like it, why are you still here? Why don't you just pick a new team?"

The only reason I halfway care about the Texans is because I just happen to live in Houston. If I moved to another city, I wouldn't give a flip about them. This is why I never understood all the residual Titans' fans in Houston after they moved. If where I moved had an NFL team then I would start following them. I have no vested interest in the Texans and stand to gain no financial windfall from them, win or lose. I follow them because it's (literally) the only game in town. What fun would it be to just randomly pick another team in another city and declare, "I'm a Brown's fan now, By Gawd!"?
If you're referring to me, SBT and I have been talking Texans football together for a lot of years on here. The reason I asked is because we do have an emotional attachment to the Texans. He has a financial investment in the team. If I were as displeased with the team as he sometimes seems to be, I could follow another team. I wasn't being snide at all. I was asking an honest question. I even put that in my post.
 
If you're referring to me, SBT and I have been talking Texans football together for a lot of years on here. The reason I asked is because we do have an emotional attachment to the Texans. He has a financial investment in the team. If I were as displeased with the team as he sometimes seems to be, I could follow another team. I wasn't being snide at all. I was asking an honest question. I even put that in my post.
Got it. That makes sense. I have, however, seen that question posted before and never understood the rationale.
 
You completely missed the point of that post. The point of that post was to illustrate that we aren't desperate like the Vikings were when they lost their starter the week before the regular season started. In order to keep their playoff hopes alive, they wanted an experienced starter so they HAD to pay a ransom.
Or are you telling me they would have been better off just rolling with 37-yr old Shaun Hill?

The Texans aren't desperate like that at all. So why should we pay a ransom in draft picks?? I don't have anything against going for Garoppolo if that's what O'Brien wants to do. I just think we shouldn't do what you said was dumb, overpay. Like some say we did for Osweiler

There's no rush. We still have Savage and Osweiler who have had time in this system. Why not give one of those guys a 2nd year in this system and use those picks to build the team around the starter?
Jimmy G has time in the system and should be pretty much up to speed on the concepts and what he's seeing. I'm with you though. It's a well known fact that I dislike giving up draft picks, especially to BB. He's a Jedi Master in this and will get maximum value. It's like playing playing poker for the 1st time against a card shark. I'm not a Rick Smith hater, but I doubt he can outwit BB. It's a seller's market with Jimmy G and like TK pointed out, the Texans are not 1 player away from contention. OL and ILB needs to be addressed.
 
You completely missed the point of that post. The point of that post was to illustrate that we aren't desperate like the Vikings were when they lost their starter the week before the regular season started. In order to keep their playoff hopes alive, they wanted an experienced starter so they HAD to pay a ransom.
Or are you telling me they would have been better off just rolling with 37-yr old Shaun Hill?

The Texans aren't desperate like that at all. So why should we pay a ransom in draft picks?? I don't have anything against going for Garoppolo if that's what O'Brien wants to do. I just think we shouldn't do what you said was dumb, overpay. Like some say we did for Osweiler

There's no rush. We still have Savage and Osweiler who have had time in this system. Why not give one of those guys a 2nd year in this system and use those picks to build the team around the starter?

I believe the Vikings gave up a 1st and 4th. That's not what I would consider a ransom. But Jimmy G will come at a higher price.

I really wanted the Texans to draft Garoppolo. I did a lot of research on him prior to the 2014 draft. Not just his film but interviews. In one of the interviews during his senior year someone asked him why he didn't have a girlfriend during his college years and he said I just want to concentrate on football and help win games for my team. I thought, Ok, he looks good on film and he has a JJ Watt attitude. Even as of August 2016, when asked about his status, "no girlfriend, single right now. All in good time."

If all it took was a 1st and 4th to get Jimmy, I'd do that deal every day.
 
Jimmy G has time in the system and should be pretty much up to speed on the concepts and what he's seeing. I'm with you though. It's a well known fact that I dislike giving up draft picks, especially to BB. He's a Jedi Master in this and will get maximum value. It's like playing playing poker for the 1st time against a card shark. I'm not a Rick Smith hater, but I doubt he can outwit BB. It's a seller's market with Jimmy G and like TK pointed out, the Texans are not 1 player away from contention. OL and ILB needs to be addressed.

You could draft a OL/ILB in the 2nd/3rd rds. Heck you could dradft an OL in the 2nd then trade back into the 2nd using a 2nd-5th (Remember late 2nd) for a ILB. My favorites are Taylor Moton/Hassan Reddick for late 2nd rd picks.

Bottom line, none of this matters if they dont find a capable QB. I've studied Jimmy G quite a bit and he's my guy.
 
I believe the Vikings gave up a 1st and 4th. That's not what I would consider a ransom. But Jimmy G will come at a higher price.

I really wanted the Texans to draft Garoppolo. I did a lot of research on him prior to the 2014 draft. Not just his film but interviews. In one of the interviews during his senior year someone asked him why he didn't have a girlfriend during his college years and he said I just want to concentrate on football and help win games for my team. I thought, Ok, he looks good on film and he has a JJ Watt attitude. Even as of August 2016, when asked about his status, "no girlfriend, single right now. All in good time."

If all it took was a 1st and 4th to get Jimmy, I'd do that deal every day.

Most people who think Jimmy G is just another Pats backup QB like Mallett dont know much if anything about Jimmy G, his talent or his background.
 
When I look at guys coming out of college that is one of the things I look for. However, in the pros QBs don't hold it as high as I think they should... for the reason you pointed out & ball security.

Personally I think it's a negative mark for someone as inexperienced as Osweiler to already be dropping his hold point, but, he doesn't hold it as low as many. It is a positive mark, in my mind, that Peyton still holds the ball the way he was taught to.

Everytime I criticize college QBs for holding the ball low, someone retorts with this guy

Rodgers does hold the ball a bit low when scrambling and sitting in the pocket, but he actually cheats a bit here and raises the ball as he locks onto a target, right before he throws it. It's kind of funny to watch him go through progressions as he raises the ball slightly when he's zeroing in on a receiver, then lowers it a bit as he scans for another target. When he's on the run, he takes a long wind up and avoids the quick release he normally tosses.

Brock has more of a Tim Tebow motion from what I can see. I know this isn't the best play to show his motion, but it's the first one I found with a slowed view and HD quality. You can see he's not under pressure, swings the ball low, and comes up over his head with a U shaped hand holding the ball from the underside. His hand is also pretty far from the rest of his body, which is probably due to his arm length and height, but it's not mechanically ideal for a passer. Anyways, I really do think there are fundamental issues with his delivery that could be improved, but I do think his slow throwing motion is part of the problem and also contributes to his inability to hit receivers in stride.

up6nMUW.gif
 
Rodgers does hold the ball a bit low when scrambling and sitting in the pocket, but he actually cheats a bit here and raises the ball as he locks onto a target, right before he throws it. It's kind of funny to watch him go through progressions as he raises the ball slightly when he's zeroing in on a receiver, then lowers it a bit as he scans for another target. When he's on the run, he takes a long wind up and avoids the quick release he normally tosses.

Brock has more of a Tim Tebow motion from what I can see. I know this isn't the best play to show his motion, but it's the first one I found with a slowed view and HD quality. You can see he's not under pressure, swings the ball low, and comes up over his head with a U shaped hand holding the ball from the underside. His hand is also pretty far from the rest of his body, which is probably due to his arm length and height, but it's not mechanically ideal for a passer. Anyways, I really do think there are fundamental issues with his delivery that could be improved, but I do think his slow throwing motion is part of the problem and also contributes to his inability to hit receivers in stride.

up6nMUW.gif


Watching Brock wiiiind up to throw is 5 minutes of my life I'm never getting back.
 
Cutler would be an improvement over Os , hell my sister would be an improvement over Os .... might be a fall back plan if you cant get a Garappolo or McCarron , assuming you get him cheap with outs in the contract.

We get Cutler, and we might as well tank.

I'd rather watch the entire organization and the fan base humiliate themselves again going 2-14 if they were that stupid. I'd root for it actually.

Cutler shouldn't get a job anywhere. Not even as a backup.
 
Thought I'd see what all the fuss is about. Admittedly, I'm not a draftnik so I don't go all fan-boy on any young QB.
But you guys must be seeing something.


Dude has a quicker release/better throwing motion than Osweiler.
...but who doesn't?

I'm kinda surprised you fanboys hadn't posted these already
:)
 
Thought I'd see what all the fuss is about. Admittedly, I'm not a draftnik so I don't go all fan-boy on any young QB.
But you guys must be seeing something.


Dude has a quicker release/better throwing motion than Osweiler.
...but who doesn't?

I'm kinda surprised you fanboys hadn't posted these already
:)

I've watched him carefully since he first was drafted. Don't need to.

Honestly it isn't worth debating anymore really. I keep forgetting that Belicheck would be really foolish to trade him here and I don't think he'll do that. I'm sure there will be plenty of suitors and he'll have no problem dishing him out to the NFC or some team like the Browns where it likely won't haunt them if Brady doesn't last much longer or gets injured. If I were Belicheck, no way in hell I gift him to the Texans, Vikings, or the Broncos. I'd trade him for less somewhere else.
 
Man Belichick will not have a problem trading Jimmy this way. Some of you cats are going way overboard with that chain of thought. As long as Brady continues to play at a high level haha why would he be. I mean really gentlemen.
 
I've watched him carefully since he first was drafted. Don't need to.

Honestly it isn't worth debating anymore really. I keep forgetting that Belicheck would be really foolish to trade him here and I don't think he'll do that. I'm sure there will be plenty of suitors and he'll have no problem dishing him out to the NFC or some team like the Browns where it likely won't haunt them if Brady doesn't last much longer or gets injured. If I were Belicheck, no way in hell I gift him to the Texans, Vikings, or the Broncos. I'd trade him for less somewhere else.
The Browns definitely need a QB and have plenty of draft picks available.
 
I've watched him carefully since he first was drafted. Don't need to.

Honestly it isn't worth debating anymore really. I keep forgetting that Belicheck would be really foolish to trade him here and I don't think he'll do that. I'm sure there will be plenty of suitors and he'll have no problem dishing him out to the NFC or some team like the Browns where it likely won't haunt them if Brady doesn't last much longer or gets injured. If I were Belicheck, no way in hell I gift him to the Texans, Vikings, or the Broncos. I'd trade him for less somewhere else.
I reckon Belichek and Brady retire at the same time so if it's up to Belichek, he wont care where Jimmy goes as he won't have to face him or the consequences. He will likely sell him to the highest bidder.
The main sticking point may be Mr. Kraft - he will still own the team and may want some input in that scenario.
 
Last edited:
I reckon Belichek and Brady retire at the same time so if it's up to Belichek, he wont care where Jimmy goes as he won't have to face him or the consequences. He will likely sel him to the highest bideer.
The main sticking point may be Mr. Kraft - he will still own the team and may want some input in that scenario.


What consequences??
 
Practice; it's just practice. :)
Peterman looks good without pressure in his face; very good, in fact.
It's when the bullets start flying that I like to see more of him.
 
A guy that looks intriguing to me now is Sefo Liufau.
Not as elusive as Mahomes, but bigger and tougher.
Played pretty well under pressure.
Twisted his ankle in the Michigan but continued to make play afterward.
Re-aggravate the injury in subsequent games, but kept playing much as he can.
Played as a dual QB at Colorado because his HC wanted to utilize his size and athleticism, also probably because they can't recruit Oline well.
He was playing in a pro system in HS.
Did take some snaps under center in college.
I think this guy is a real sleeper.
Good throwing mechanics in general, holding the ball high, with a short throwing motion.
Also had lisfranc the year before, so he needs to be checked out medically.
A great prospect on the third day, but I think his stock could rise.
I wouldn't mind taking him in the fourth round, maybe even in the third if his injury is cleared.
 
I reckon Belichek and Brady retire at the same time so if it's up to Belichek, he wont care where Jimmy goes as he won't have to face him or the consequences. He will likely sell him to the highest bidder.
The main sticking point may be Mr. Kraft - he will still own the team and may want some input in that scenario.

Mr. Kraft will have to sober up.
 
Liufau's measurements at the Senior Bowl are impressive.6'3-3/8, 240
Hand size 10-7/8
Arm length 33

Too good of a prospect to pass up, all things considered.
 
Liufau looks the part but is constantly banged up and has a history of foot/ankle issues. He has great intangibles but struggles with accuracy, consistency, and comes from a spread offense. Most of his passes at CU were deep shots down the sideline or screens/quick passes at the LOS. They largely avoided throwing over the middle of the field with him. Definitely a project but one who comes with physical tools and intangibles although the injury history is disconcerting. By my count he got injured 4 different times just this season and that's after having a Lisfranc injury last year.
 
Per Walter Football Rumor Mill

One team that has been rumored to be in the market for trading for Garoppolo is the Houston Texans. However, in speaking with Texans sources, that is very unlikely. Houston doesn't sound willing to be interested in dealing the necessary picks for Garoppolo. The Texans are definitely in the market to add talent to their quarterback competition, but they are more likely to select a signal-caller in the early rounds of the 2017 NFL Draft.

According to sources, if the Texans do acquire a veteran, it would probably be a free agent like Jay Cutler or Tony Romo if they were released and willing to take a cheap contract. The Texans are the only playoff team in the market for a starting quarterback, so if either Cutler or Romo wants a shot to win before the end of their careers, Houston could be their best opportunity. The Texans won't be able to offer a big contract for either veteran because of the money taken up by Brock Osweiler. Thus, the most likely move will be taking a quarterback prospect with one of their early picks in the 2017 NFL Draft.


This makes no sense to me ..... The QB's in this draft are not pro ready and are marginal prospects at best and they are willing to spend an early pick on one yet they have a pro ready , somewhat proven player for the asking and aren't interested in dealing the picks ??

Yeah , use the pick on someone who's gonna ride the pine for 2+ years instead of a guy who comes in and is instantly your best quarterback ..... FFS can we fire Tricky Rick and Bob yet ?!
 
This makes no sense to me ..... The QB's in this draft are not pro ready and are marginal prospects at best and they are willing to spend an early pick on one yet they have a pro ready , somewhat proven player for the asking and aren't interested in dealing the picks ??

Yeah , use the pick on someone who's gonna ride the pine for 2+ years instead of a guy who comes in and is instantly your best quarterback ..... FFS can we fire Tricky Rick and Bob yet ?!

Well this is Rick McNair we're talking about.

He doesn't think like this, after getting burned by Os he's to afraid of putting his job on the line by trading for another teams backup QB. Not that McNair would ever fire his illegitimate son.

Hence the Texans are where they are.
 
This makes no sense to me ..... The QB's in this draft are not pro ready and are marginal prospects at best and they are willing to spend an early pick on one yet they have a pro ready , somewhat proven player for the asking and aren't interested in dealing the picks ??

Yeah , use the pick on someone who's gonna ride the pine for 2+ years instead of a guy who comes in and is instantly your best quarterback ..... FFS can we fire Tricky Rick and Bob yet ?!

Well this is Rick McNair we're talking about.

He doesn't think like this, after getting burned by Os he's to afraid of putting his job on the line by trading for another teams backup QB. Not that McNair would ever fire his illegitimate son.

Hence the Texans are where they are.

geez guys, it's just a rumor and Walterfootball hasn't been very accurate when it comes to the Texans
 
You completely missed the point of that post. The point of that post was to illustrate that we aren't desperate like the Vikings were when they lost their starter the week before the regular season started. In order to keep their playoff hopes alive, they wanted an experienced starter so they HAD to pay a ransom.
Or are you telling me they would have been better off just rolling with 37-yr old Shaun Hill?

The Texans aren't desperate like that at all. So why should we pay a ransom in draft picks?? I don't have anything against going for Garoppolo if that's what O'Brien wants to do. I just think we shouldn't do what you said was dumb, overpay. Like some say we did for Osweiler

There's no rush. We still have Savage and Osweiler who have had time in this system. Why not give one of those guys a 2nd year in this system and use those picks to build the team around the starter?

I guess the answer to that lies in what you believe about either of those guys .... If you are confident in either making significant strides in year two , then your thoughts make sense.

I simply don't believe either of those two are capable of taking the significant steps to being just competent .... not even being remotely special , just getting TO competent. I just don't see it in either of them ....

I also believe that this roster is a quarterback away from playing for all the marbles .... The defense has the potential to be one of the very best we've seen in a long while assuming JJ Watt returns healthy with Mercilus & Clowney up front and that you have a window of opportunity of about two years before you simply cant afford to keep the defense together .... So I'm of the opinion we need a quarterback who can come in and win DAY ONE , not in 2-3 years or you waste this window of opportunity.

No quarterback they draft this year is going to be ready to go day one .... so why not use that draft pick to acquire one who is. (Garappolo , Romo , Cutler , and possibly McCarron)
 
geez guys, it's just a rumor and Walterfootball hasn't been very accurate when it comes to the Texans

Well, why wouldn't the Texans be thinking about it?

Ok, you say it's just a rumor, I'm asking in your opinion is this something the Texans should be looking in to & if they aren't, why wouldn't they?
 
Well, why wouldn't the Texans be thinking about it?

Ok, you say it's just a rumor, I'm asking in your opinion is this something the Texans should be looking in to & if they aren't, why wouldn't they?

I was just commenting on the posts crucifying Rick and Bob for not making the decision to trade for G based on the rumor. I think they should consider it, and I don't think it'll take a 1 and a 4 to get it done
 
I was just commenting on the posts crucifying Rick and Bob for not making the decision to trade for G based on the rumor. I think they should consider it, and I don't think it'll take a 1 and a 4 to get it done

I understand.

So we know the Patriots are willing to trade Garoppolo, or is that rumor?

We'll know soon enough if someone is willing to meet the Patriots ask (if it is in fact true that they're interested in a trade).

How would you feel if Garoppolo is traded to another team for less than a 1st & 4th? Would you feel the Texans should have offered the 1st & 4th to get him?
 
Liufau looks the part but is constantly banged up and has a history of foot/ankle issues. He has great intangibles but struggles with accuracy, consistency, and comes from a spread offense. Most of his passes at CU were deep shots down the sideline or screens/quick passes at the LOS. They largely avoided throwing over the middle of the field with him. Definitely a project but one who comes with physical tools and intangibles although the injury history is disconcerting. By my count he got injured 4 different times just this season and that's after having a Lisfranc injury last year.
Yeah, I've said that his injuries need to be checked out.

Not to worry about the throws down the middle; I've seen plenty, into tight windows, too.
 
I understand.

So we know the Patriots are willing to trade Garoppolo, or is that rumor?

We'll know soon enough if someone is willing to meet the Patriots ask (if it is in fact true that they're interested in a trade).

How would you feel if Garoppolo is traded to another team for less than a 1st & 4th? Would you feel the Texans should have offered the 1st & 4th to get him?

No we don't know for sure they want to trade him. If they trade him to someone else then they trade him. Will we ever know what if anything the Texans offered? What if the Texans did offer a 1 and a 4 but BB didn't want him to go to the Texans, would we ever know that?
 
I guess the answer to that lies in what you believe about either of those guys .... If you are confident in either making significant strides in year two , then your thoughts make sense.

I simply don't believe either of those two are capable of taking the significant steps to being just competent .... not even being remotely special , just getting TO competent. I just don't see it in either of them ....

I also believe that this roster is a quarterback away from playing for all the marbles .... The defense has the potential to be one of the very best we've seen in a long while assuming JJ Watt returns healthy with Mercilus & Clowney up front and that you have a window of opportunity of about two years before you simply cant afford to keep the defense together .... So I'm of the opinion we need a quarterback who can come in and win DAY ONE , not in 2-3 years or you waste this window of opportunity.

No quarterback they draft this year is going to be ready to go day one .... so why not use that draft pick to acquire one who is. (Garappolo , Romo , Cutler , and possibly McCarron)
I hear you. And agree to a certain extent.
But I just see four different starting QBs in four years as doing things like the Browns have been doing things. That hasn't worked for them. Unless we luck up on a Dak Prescott, I don't see that strategy working for us. And Dak had a Zeke Elliott and a damn good O-line to help him succeed.
 
I understand.

So we know the Patriots are willing to trade Garoppolo, or is that rumor?

We'll know soon enough if someone is willing to meet the Patriots ask (if it is in fact true that they're interested in a trade).

How would you feel if Garoppolo is traded to another team for less than a 1st & 4th? Would you feel the Texans should have offered the 1st & 4th to get him?


That's just a rumor Thunderkyss. Why would the Patriots front office leak that type of info right before the Superbowl. We should all know Belichick doesn't operates like that anyways.
 
Back
Top