Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!

The Mike Vrabel thread

Playoffs

Hall of Fame
Time for a Mike Vrabel thread, a guy whose ceiling I think is very high in regards to climbing the coaching ladder.

[IMGwidthsize=450]http://prod.images.texans.clubs.nflcdn.com/image-web/NFL/CDA/data/deployed/prod/TEXANS/assets/images/imported/HOU/photos/clubimages/2014/05-May/temp_DSC6069--nfl_mezz_1280_1024.JPG?width=960&height=720[/IMG]

Tania Ganguli begins a Q&A series with Mike...

Mike Vrabel Q&A: Clowney, Cushing, Reed
One advantage of being a Super Bowl champion player turned coach is that you have a lot of examples of great players you played with to share with the ones you're now coaching.

It's part of Houston Texans' linebackers coach Mike Vrabel's style. He thinks about which of his former teammates players can relate to and offers them as examples of what works.

As his coaching career progresses, there will likely come a time when he starts using players he coached for those examples.

Vrabel and I sat down on Thursday to discuss his coaching philosophy, leaving Ohio State, rookie outside linebacker Jadeveon Clowney and more. I'll break it up into three posts, starting here, with his thoughts on Clowney, Brian Cushing and Brooks Reed.

How has Clowney done so far learning to play outside linebacker?

Mike Vrabel: I think his attitude, much like all of our guys, their attitude has been great... He's somebody that we're excited about because he has the natural ability, but he also has the attitude to want to learn. He doesn't think he has it all figured out.

What did you learn about his mentality before the draft?

MV: ...meeting with him before the draft, I enjoyed my conversations with him. He was conscientious, he wanted to learn, he wanted to study. He knows a...

Was the taking plays off thing overblown?

MV: Everyone gets critiqued on their performance. Whether I get critiqued as a coach or players get critiqued as players, people are going to find the worst things. We need to change the things that we don't do well and we need continue and advance...

Inside linebacker has been a bit of a question. How has Brooks Reed done playing in there?

MV: He's an unbelievably coachable kid. If J.J. Watt's in here the most hours and our quarterbacks, Brooks Reed's gotta be a close second. It means a lot to Brooks Reed. It means a lot to Brian Cushing. It means a lot to all of these guys. And they're in here putting time in. it's a completely different defense, completely different coaching style, completely different philosophy. He's putting the time in. he gets excited. I'm happy when it does well. He's frustrated when he doesn't. I look forward to working with him each day.

I've heard you and Brian Cushing are similar. Do you see that?

MV: ...He's been limited, he hasn't been able to practice with us, but he's at every meeting. He's there. He's conscientious, he's making the calls. I know he's studying. And it's important now that he's getting mental reps. He's staying in tune with the team. He's not a distraction. He's focused on learning the defense and being a leader.
snipped, read complete article here: http://espn.go.com/blog/houston-tex...on-1-with-mike-vrabel-on-clowney-cushing-reed
 
I've heard you and Brian Cushing are similar. Do you see that?

MV: He's the only guy I think that's married with kids. We have guys that are married and we have a guy that's got a kid. So he's the only guy that's married with kids, so right there I know he's the only guy that's got a wife and kids. He has done well. He's been limited. We all understand that. He's been limited, he hasn't been able to practice with us, but he's at every meeting. He's there. He's conscientious, he's making the calls. I know he's studying. And it's important now that he's getting mental reps. He's staying in tune with the team. He's not a distraction. He's focused on learning the defense and being a leader.

Hmmm.:shades:
 
I wouldn't read into it that much, I think the team wants to be very careful handling his knees

I understand what you're saying. But as I've posted before, he is more than double out the expected full recovery time. And if he is being kept out of action for solely reasons of extra extra extra caution, and he is considered that fragile, as some are assuming, then we've got just as much if not more of a problem.
 
I wouldn't read into it that much, I think the team wants to be very careful handling his knees
Doc is not reading into the comment but into the known info on Cushing's medical condition. The last two seasons have been hard on Brian's health.
 
Doc is not reading into the comment but into the known info on Cushing's medical condition. The last two seasons have been hard on Brian's health.

Not try to take anything away from Doc or anything, I really meant to comment to the boards , not so much him directly, my apologies. But I still stand by my comment. I personally wouldn't label him as "fragile" or anything along those lines. We all seen the (don't wanna say cheap shots) blocks? He took low. So for anybody to say he injury prone, etc, is just absurd IMHO.(not saying anyone in particular has) but I've seen comments on other sites were others do.
 
Not try to take anything away from Doc or anything, I really meant to comment to the boards , not so much him directly, my apologies. But I still stand by my comment. I personally wouldn't label him as "fragile" or anything along those lines. We all seen the (don't wanna say cheap shots) blocks? He took low. So for anybody to say he injury prone, etc, is just absurd IMHO.(not saying anyone in particular has) but I've seen comments on other sites were others do.

If Brian Cushing was limited, then they're not telling us the whole story.

If they were accurate with everything they told us so far, Cushing should have been ready for contact a long time ago. Learning a new defensive system with a new defensive coach & a lot of new defensive players... can't imagine the thought process that would have him on the sideline.
 
Not try to take anything away from Doc or anything, I really meant to comment to the boards , not so much him directly, my apologies. But I still stand by my comment. I personally wouldn't label him as "fragile" or anything along those lines. We all seen the (don't wanna say cheap shots) blocks? He took low. So for anybody to say he injury prone, etc, is just absurd IMHO.(not saying anyone in particular has) but I've seen comments on other sites were others do.

No apologies necessary.

But "fragile" is exactly what the Texans are labeling him as, if his injuries and postoperative course were straight-forward and uncomplicated as reported.........something that I otherwise would have to strongly question.
 
[IMGwidthsize=400]http://prod.images.texans.clubs.nflcdn.com/image-web/NFL/CDA/data/deployed/prod/TEXANS/assets/images/imported/HOU/photos/clubimages/2014/05-May/tempWyckoff_DSC_4862--nfl_mezz_1280_1024.jpg?width=960&height=720[/IMG]

Mike Vrabel Q&A: On coaching, leaving OSU
When he's out on the practice field, Houston Texans linebackers coach Mike Vrabel often looks like he could still suit up and play. He's active out there both with his words of instruction and by doing many of the drills with the players he's coaching.

He likes how the players have adjusted to his style, and this staff's style...

What's your teaching philosophy?

Mike Vrabel: First and foremost you have to learn the individual, how they learn. Some guys may learn through walkthrough. Some guys may learn on the board. Some guys may learn on film. Some guys may learn by drawing on a board. I think it’s my job first as a coach and a teacher to understand what that style is. I just can’t teach the whole room the same way. ...

It seems like a theme with this staff.

MV: I think so. First of all great coaches don’t assume that any player, however long they’ve played, whether it be one year or 13 years, that they know everything or they know the little details. So we’re going to coach every little detail here until our guys understand what it is we’re looking for from practice, from certain plays, from certain techniques. Certain fundamentals that are important to every position.

What do you remember about changing coaches when you changed teams?

MV: I went from Bill Cowher who was a very motivational coach, a very high energy coach, to Bill Belichick who may not be as high energy, may not come across as high energy, he puts a lot of energy in. He’s not going to be out there rallying the troops and firing them up, but he’s going to be very direct, to the point, honest about his evaluations as a player. The one thing you can appreciate about each coach is his consistency. ... Now I’m going to try to do the same thing with the linebackers, give them consistency so they know what to expect each day. ... There’s things we expect them to know after a certain amount of time. Continuing to not look past the little details, don’t let one thing pass with one guy and get on another guy. So, coach them consistently. A guy makes a mistake, coach him immediately. The other guys needs to see what’s going on because we can’t coach all 15 guys at the same time.

When you were playing, did you know you wanted to be a coach someday?

MV: I don’t know what else I’m cut out to be. I’m a husband, I’m a dad. I played football for half my life, more than half my life. It was a natural progression to get into the game. I got into the game at the college level and this opportunity came up and I was more than excited about taking advantage of it.

You're an Ohio guy, grew up there, played in college there, going back to Ohio State must have felt like going home in a way.

MV: ...I’ve had a home in Columbus since 1993...We’re looking forward to getting everybody down here.

Will you go back to Columbus when it's all said and done?

MV: I go back every weekend, but they’re moving down in July. They’re nomads. My kids have adjusted. They did half the school year in Boston, half in Columbus. Half in Kansas City, half in Columbus. They don’t care.

What's the difference between coaching college kids and coaching pros?

MV: I don’t know. Other than that these guys are here more. They’re not required to go to class. Their job is a full time football player and everything that they do from the time they wake up if they want to be successful needs to be geared towards football. Whether that’s training, rehab, treatment, weight training, film study and practice, watching afterward, getting treatment afterward. Some of these guys are very young guys, we have a young group of linebackers. So we’re teaching them how to become professionals. Teaching them what guys that I played with, that were good pros, did. That they all have routines. That they take care of their body. They’re in early, they stay late. It’s one of the top three priorities in their life.
 
Last edited:
Welcome, Mike Vrabel & family moving to Houston! Having him on staff had to erase any doubts selecting JD Clowney #1 overall. Kicking Brooks inside, being careful with Cush all good with a bunch of hungry youngsters working hard to make Texan roster this position has gone from area of weakness to strength led by V.
 
I understand what you're saying. But as I've posted before, he is more than double out the expected full recovery time. And if he is being kept out of action for solely reasons of extra extra extra caution, and he is considered that fragile, as some are assuming, then we've got just as much if not more of a problem.
Dang I hate to be so pessimistic about Cushing, but I can't help but feel like his situation is very similar to that of the LB with Dallas who just blew out his knee in the first day of OTAs. When Cushing finally starts to practice with the team for real, perhaps it's just a matter of time before he suffers another season-ending injury.
 
[IMGwidthsize=300]http://prod.images.texans.clubs.nflcdn.com/image-web/NFL/CDA/data/deployed/prod/TEXANS/assets/images/imported/HOU/photos/clubimages/2014/05-May/tempDSC_5367--nfl_mezz_1280_1024.JPG?width=960&height=720[/IMG]

Mike Vrabel Q&A: On transition from DE to OLB
You made the much-talked-about transition from a college defensive end to a pro outside linebacker?

Mike Vrabel: Not very quickly. Took me a while. And so I have to understand there’s a level of change with a lot of those young guys that were defensive ends two weeks ago. As of two weeks ago they were college defensive ends. I need to try to revert back to when I was trying to learn that position, the things that I struggled with and try to coach them so I can help them make it a quicker transition than what it took me.

What did you struggle with?:

MV: Just playing in space, playing on your feet. Instead of being in a three-point stance, you’re in a two-point stance. There’s coverage responsibilities, there’s rush responsibilities, most importantly really just playing on space and understanding how to tackle defenders in space as opposed to in close areas.

Some people think it was easy for you given the career you had.

MV: If they know that I played for the Steelers, I didn’t start a game for four years. And then I went to New England and started the next 10 years. So with that being said, I understand that there’s a learning curve. Not that I’m going to try to make it go any slower, but I’m going to show them examples of how I can speed up their learning curve.

What helped you?

MV: I had good coaches, I had good players. We had really good linebackers in Pittsburgh so there was the testimonial, there was the examples, there was ownership. They were veterans. Levon Kirkland, Greg Lloyd, Jason Gildon, Earl Holmes. Guys that were good football players in the National Football League on our defense on our team. They helped with the transition, they helped with the learning curve. Sometimes you can learn from a coach, sometimes you need to learn from a player. Good pros, they’re going to teach the younger guys.
 
Optimistic (as they did not use significant draft picks on ILB or WR) that Cush will be on field when he needs to be.
 
PDS ‏@PatDStat
Tuggle says he starts talking football with Coach Vrabel in the morning and ends the day talking to his Dad [former NFL'er Jessie] about football. #Texans

Tuggle continued on Vrabel, "He brings an energy to the linebacker room that we didn't really have before” #Texans

Justin Tuggle talked about Coach Vrabel and said he “demands” we know our assignments on the field. #Texans
 
Your assignment if you choose to accept it:

Go to open training camp.

Get as close as you can to Vrabel running linebacker drills.

Record it.

Do a Vine vid of the most hilarious parts.

Best use of sarcastic profanity ever. But kind too. And not just yelling to yell, they are coaching points.

I had to turn around a few times and stifle laughter he is so dang funny.
 
Does everybody "get" it, or does it go over their heads?

Oh yeah, he is very direct. Both positive and negative. There is no misunderstanding his teaching points. They are emphatic. Easy to understand. He shows them what to do. And he is often hilarious (and memorable) in how he says it.
 
Your assignment if you choose to accept it:

Go to open training camp.

Get as close as you can to Vrabel running linebacker drills.

Record it.

Do a Vine vid of the most hilarious parts.

Best use of sarcastic profanity ever. But kind too. And not just yelling to yell, they are coaching points.

I had to turn around a few times and stifle laughter he is so dang funny.
But don't you think Mike V. will censor himself with all the younguns in attendance?
 
McGinest tells Texans players to put team first
...
"I've got friends in the building," McGinest said. "I wanted to watch practice, watch film, talk with some of the young players, be a resource and just see if I could help. I just love to be out there giving tips.

"It's a good team and a great group of guys. I know Billy O is really going to get them going, and I wanted to come in and be a part of it for a couple of days.

"Players hear from the coaches a lot. When they hear from a player who went through what they're going through and made that same transformation they're making, they kind of relate in a different way."
...

McGinest is a big Crennel fan.

"Romeo is very knowledgeable," he said. "One thing that's always said about great coaches is they have schemes and game plans but they don't just throw them out there and demand their players play them.

"Romeo has that innate ability to come up with a scheme and game plan based around his talent. He'll put players in the best position to succeed. He's going to ask a lot of them and push them to play at a high level."

McGinest likes what he sees and hears about O'Brien early in his first season as an NFL head coach.

"I like his style," McGinest said. "I like that he's so demanding. He's a smart coach who understands what he wants and what styles need to be played.

"He's going to push guys. He wants tough guys. He's going to change the culture. He's teaching fundamentals, the importance of being consistent.

"When you put in new systems, it's going to take some time. Nobody's going to get it overnight. There's a process, but he's got all the ingredients for championship football."
...
 
McGinest looks pretty damned good in Texans' gear

6.gif
 
Not try to take anything away from Doc or anything, I really meant to comment to the boards , not so much him directly, my apologies. But I still stand by my comment. I personally wouldn't label him as "fragile" or anything along those lines. We all seen the (don't wanna say cheap shots) blocks? He took low. So for anybody to say he injury prone, etc, is just absurd IMHO.(not saying anyone in particular has) but I've seen comments on other sites were others do.
I see your point, but when I say injury prone I mean it in a broad sense—likely to be injured, for whatever reason. Is part of it because opponents try to get Cush out of games since he's so good? Does he bother to defend himself against cheap shots? Does the intensity with which he plays have anything to do with it?

I'll rephrase it: For whatever combination of reasons, Cushing is very likely to get hurt.
 
Just in case you want to know how good a job Mike Vrabel is doing.

8. I can’t even begin to tell you how much Whitney Mercilus has improved as an all-around menace on defense. He beat the Bears tackles repeatedly. His two sacks may not even have been his best rushes on the day either. He now has three straight games of multiple sacks - 3.5 sacks v. Jacksonville, 3.0 sacks v. Kansas City and 2.0 sacks v. Chicago. 8.5 sacks in three games. At that pace, wait, no, I’m not going on pace guy this early in the season (okay, so I did earlier in this article, sorry about that). Trust me, it’s a big number over 16 games, I’ll leave it at that. But, a more true number is 17. Whitney has 17 sacks in his last 13 games. Project THAT over 16 games (I did and it’s over 20 sacks).

22. Inside linebacker Max Bullough played well in Brian Cushing’s stead, recording five tackles, tied for second on the team on the day. He seemed to get so much more comfortable as the game wore on and had his TFL on a play where he made an excellent read and tore off for the ball carrier. He blasted through a potential blocker and tackled Jeremy Langford for the loss. It helped that Whitney Mercilus set the edge like a champ, but Bullough took off like a shot.

27. Leading tackler on the day? John Simon. He had six tackles, a sack, a TFL and two quarterback hurries. Solid day for Simon who played a bunch of snaps in this game.

But mostly, Whitney. We drafted him because he showed potential. But our last coaching staff (I love Wade, but...) didn't do a whole lot with him. But Vrabel got to him & made this guy someone other teams will have to prepare for.

Same thing with Simon. I didn't care for him when he first got here. Good size, but I didn't think he was all that athletic. Now... he looks like a beast & getting better.
 
Vrabel is gone after this season. He already had suitors last season trying to poach him away. He'll likely have better opportunities next year.

Loved him as a player and even more as a coach.
 
Vrabel is gone after this season. He already had suitors last season trying to poach him away. He'll likely have better opportunities next year.

Loved him as a player and even more as a coach.
Chances are, RAC retires and Vrabel takes over as DC next year. I don't think he'll go any where.
 
Other than wishful thinking on keeping Vrabel what basis is there for the RAC retirement prediction?
Well, RAC isn't getting any younger. He hasn't come right out and said he plans to retire, but he has eluded to it on occasion. Vrabel had the opportunity to be the DC in San Francisco this year and turned it down.
No one knows for sure, but we'll see. Vrabel was promised something to stay here, we just don't know what it was. Perhaps it is the DC job when RAC retires. We shall see.
 
Romeo Crennel turns 70 in the offseason.. unless Vrabel is offered a head coaching job, I don't see him leaving.. I think they already have a deal in place where he's promised Crennel's position here.

If he wants to be a head coach one day this is the best place for him..He just needs a few more years of success. The grass isn't always greener on the other side.
 
No one knows for sure, but we'll see. Vrabel was promised something to stay here, we just don't know what it was. Perhaps it is the DC job when RAC retires. We shall see.

He may know that better opportunities will come. San Francisco is a cluster right now. I'd hate to go over there as Kelly's guy, the Kelly gets himself fired & Vrabel is looking for a job.

Josh McDaniels has got to be getting looks as a HC again. Maybe he's waiting on that. Imagine McCown & Vrabel in San Diego next season. Or LA Rams.
 
Last edited:
Romeo Crennel turns 70 in the offseason.. unless Vrabel is offered a head coaching job, I don't see him leaving.. I think they already have a deal in place where he's promised Crennel's position here.

If he wants to be a head coach one day this is the best place for him..He just needs a few more years of success. The grass isn't always greener on the other side.

I always hear this from wishful fans when they want to keep a HC. There is nothing to suggest that Romeo is going to retire or that Vrabel will just stay here instead of working up the coaching ladder to eventually become a HC which is what all coaches pretty much want. I remember that Longhorn fans used to say the same thing about Muschamp and how he would stay forever to take over Mack's job, and I'd laugh my ass off every time the Horns fans would say this stuff knowing he wasn't going to keep turning big time jobs just to be a DC having no real idea when Mack would actually leave. If the Texans have a great year on defense again, Vrabel is gone if he has several suitors again which he likely will.
 
He may know that better opportunities will come. San Francisco is a cluster right now. I'd hate to go over there as Kelly's guy, the Kelly gets himself fired & Vrabel is looking for a job.

Josh McCown has got to be getting looks as a HC again. Maybe he's waiting on that. Imagine McCown & Vrabel in San Diego next season. Or LA Rams.

Isn't Josh McCown the quarterback of the Browns
 
I always hear this from wishful fans when they want to keep a HC. There is nothing to suggest that Romeo is going to retire or that Vrabel will just stay here instead of working up the coaching ladder to eventually become a HC which is what all coaches pretty much want. I remember that Longhorn fans used to say the same thing about Muschamp and how he would stay forever to take over Mack's job, and I'd laugh my ass off every time the Horns fans would say this stuff knowing he wasn't going to keep turning big time jobs just to be a DC having no real idea when Mack would actually leave. If the Texans have a great year on defense again, Vrabel is gone if he has several suitors again which he likely will.

The Muschamp comparison is a crappy one and doesn't even fit. Muschamp was offered a head coaching job.. I already said if someone offers Vrabel that, he's gone.

Yall keep saying he turned down the 9ers, because he's waiting on a better job.. Well if he's willing to wait on a better job, why is it so far fetched to fathom the idea that he'd be willing to wait on this one..
 
The Muschamp comparison is a crappy one and doesn't even fit. Muschamp was offered a head coaching job.. I already said if someone offers Vrabel that, he's gone.

Yall keep saying he turned down the 9ers, because he's waiting on a better job.. Well if he's willing to wait on a better job, why is it so far fetched to fathom the idea that he'd be willing to wait on this one..

It fits as it is a very similar situation. For one, you guys are "assuming" that he was promised some DC job if Romeo leaves. You are also "assuming" that Romeo is about to retire when he may feel just fine and wants to coach. We don't know if the Texans promised him anything, and even if they did coaches don't just sit around and hope that the franchise is loyal to their promises that aren't contractual. Hell, if there is a promise in place and the defense goes to crap, do you think the Texans are going to honor their promise to a position coach whose players may not have played well down the stretch? What if they don't have a great D where it drops off some while Vrabel is the "DC in waiting?" What if OB gets pressure to get a new DC like Kubiak did multiple times while he was the HC? Vrabel isn't going to just sit around here forever knowing all of those things can happen especially knowing what an impact JJ Watt is to this defense and if he were to get injured.

In the end Muschamp did not wait like so many Longhorn fanatics swore he would thinking they were the best gig in town. Muschamp wasn't going to wait around forever for that opportunity to assume it would be there forever while his HC opportunities wouldn't. Vrabel has to become a DC before becoming a HC if that is his end goal which I'm sure it is. Most position coaches don't get hired before they become DC's or OC's. It happens, but it is pretty rare. Vrabel is going to do whats best for his career, and more than likely that will be to take a DC job as long as it isn't a horrible situation. The San Francisco situation was a really bad one with a lot of potential disasters that could happen. No surprise he turned that one down. There won't be many others where he will.
 
'I know what he's going t do.'

'No, I know what he's going to do!'

'No, you don't know anything.'

'No, you don't know anything.'

'Well, I know what he's going to do more than you!'

'Ya, well ... you don't really know.'

'... do too'

'... nuh uh ... not like I do'

'... nuh uh ...'
 
Well, RAC isn't getting any younger. He hasn't come right out and said he plans to retire, but he has eluded to it on occasion. Vrabel had the opportunity to be the DC in San Francisco this year and turned it down.
No one knows for sure, but we'll see. Vrabel was promised something to stay here, we just don't know what it was. Perhaps it is the DC job when RAC retires. We shall see.
Crennel is exactly 3 days older than Wade Phillips! Anyone think Wade's planning on hanging it up due to age after this season? Not that I wouldn't mind seeing it happen (Vrabel replacing Crennel - not Wade retiring), I just don't see any reason to count on it happening any time soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB
Ah, it reminds me of the old Houston Oilers, who couldn't attract a good head coach because all the smart coaches knew what a stupid organization they'd be getting into. Just because Vrabel turned down a bad SF situation doesn't mean he wouldn't accept a good one. You're just having pipe dreams if you think he won't bail if he gets an offer he likes.
 
Back
Top