#2 Wr's Rec Yds Avg av/g Lng TD 20+ 40+ 1st 1st%
Wes Welker 111 1,165 10.5 72.8 64 3 13 1 57 51.4
Anquan Boldin 89 1,038 11.7 86.5 79 11 10 3 56 62.9
Kevin Walter 60 899 15.0 56.2 61 8 15 4 39 65.0
What wouldnt you like out of having the 3rd best #2 WR? His stats are comprable. Those are the only #2's with better production, and Welker only had 3 td's. He just doesnt know the name, so obviously he sucks.
Not attempting to disagree with the general consensus on Walter (I like him alot), but I'm not sure exactly how you define productivity.
Eddie Royal had more catches and more yardage than Walter, as the #2 guy in Denver. Not as many TD's as Walter, but that's why I ask about the definition of productivity. Also, you could argue that as the #2 guy to Tony Gonzalez, Dwayne Bowe is ahead of Walter's productivity with 86 catches for just over 1,000 yards. Shoot, you could even say that Owen Daniels is the #2 receiver on the Texans based on productivity (and then start comparing Walters to #3 receivers). Finally, you have situations like the Jets with Cotchery and Coles, and Green Bay with Jennings and Driver where the #1 receiver is clearly not as good as AJ, but that doesn't keep the #2 guy from being more productive (again - subject to definition) than Walter. My point is even if you agree to objectively define the rankings of the #2 guy by statistics, it's still a topic that's subject to discussion.
Overall, this is a little bit like the discussion of the OL. Should we be happy with our receiver situation? My answer would be definitely! Should we be putting this unit at or near the top of our team strengths? Again, I believe without a doubt we should, and therefore, we likely won't be seeing much in the way of resources added to this unit over the course of this offseason.
Everything, including our receiver situation, is capable of being improved. It's just that some things, including our receiver situation (IMO), are good enough not to warrant putting much in the way of finite resources towards improving.