Wolf
100% Texan
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footba...YF?slug=dw-oklahoma112308&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
NORMAN, Okla. College footballs leadership has hatched plenty of harebrained ideas in its annual quest to ruin the national championship chase.
The one that promises to derail the season of either Oklahoma or Texas, which, you might recall, actually beat the Sooners last month, might be the most bizarre
The Big 12 South champion could be determined by a poll of faceless, feckless and too often partisan voters far from these windswept plains.
Only a sport with such a profound lack of leadership, in this case Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe, could descend into a cross between figure skating and American Idol.
The Big 12 failed to come up with enough of its own criteria for breaking a three-way tie at the top of the standings, as Oklahoma, Texas and Texas Tech could produce. Instead it was willing to punt to the computers and voters who determine the BCS rankings. Whatever team is ranked highest wins the division.
Among the problems: Few of the coaches who vote in the coaches poll have seen anything but snippets of play from the league. They are no better than the 114 politically connected folks of various qualifications and attention spans who make up the Harris Poll. Combined, the two polls count for two-thirds of the rankings.
Each voter has personal biases, constituents to answer to and self-interests.
Since the BCS has no set standards for ranking teams, just about anything can be taken into consideration.
Should Texas get the nod because it beat Oklahoma? Should it be Oklahoma because it put together the most impressive performance of the season in blasting Tech 65-21? Should Tech be considered because a voter likes its coach?
How about strength of schedule? Or margin of victory? Coolest mascot? Color scheme? Does it matter whos played the most recent TV game?