Actually, according to John McClain, he DID get a 6. He then took it again and scored "around" a 16. Now we know McClain is VY's PR guy, so around a 16 probably means a 12 or 13 or something. If it actually was better than that he would have said it and if it was a 16 he wouldn't have said "Around". he would have said "It was a 16". Not trying to tear the kid down, but not trying to pump smoke up folks backsides either. The first report came from PFT who is just a rumore mill, however, the other reports came from KFFL and others who in fact were correct in reporting that he did shoot a 6 and then was able to improve it on a re-test (good for him). His management team are a freaking joke and should be shot for allowing the kid to get this screwed up on the test by not properly preparing him, then screwed-up at the Whitehouse gig and others. I find it odd to say the least that folks want to spend the #1 pick on a QB that has question marks regarding his mental capacity, ability to read defenses, arm strength, type of offense he played in, coachability etc. Since when is a number one pick who has that many question marks and isn't even the top ranked player at his position, much less in the draft, supposed to be the #1 pick in value? That makes ZERO sense IMO. That isn't the profile of a number one pick IMO, but rather A development type of pick. If VY weren't from UT with all of the venom that has been spewed by them and were available later in the draft as a development player, then yes, I might take a swing at him, but as the number one pick in a good quality draft....NO FREAKING WAY. He is a very high risk pick IMO. Could be a high reward guy, but you don't pick that type of player number one in the whole draft, that would be insane.