Trade out of the 1st round

[El Tejano]

Anyone else here think that now that we got the QB we were gonna get in rd 1 and most likely not get a RB now that we have Miller, the possibility of trading out of the 1st round is high?

I think so....if we want to go WR, we can get some good ones in round 2 and I think the same can be said for OL and TE.

 

[otisbean]

I think if you want an OT, which I think is a strong need for us based on Brown's injury and Newton's play last year, I think we have to keep our first. If the top group of OT's are gone, I wouldn't mind trading back.

 

[infantrycak]

Nope. I could see trading with Denver to get them closer to QB territory.

 

[steelbtexan]

I would keep the 1st for the reasons posters listed above. I would be willing to trade out of the 2nd if I could get another teams 3rd-4th. That is where the depth is in this draft.

 

[WolverineFan]

1st round picks are extremely valuable now after the new CBA because you get the extra year of control with the 5th year option.

 

[Shishkabob]

I would keep the 1st for the reasons posters listed above. I would be willing to trade out of the 2nd if I could get another teams 3rd-4th. That is where the depth is in this draft.

Not with our GM lol

 

[The Pencil Neck]

If the right guy drops within range, I could actually see us moving up a few spots. For someone like a Doctson or Conklin, maybe even Ragland.

 

[Texian]

As long as there is a BIG hole at LT I would say no. UNLESS a trade out includes a 2017 !st RD pick, then maybe.