76Texan, not in that raiders example, that's a rather bad example the receiver simply slowed down and was trying to head back to the ball giving the CB a huge advantage, if that ball is 5 more yards down the field that's 6 points for palmer. Both the CB/safety were beat on that.
I understand where you come from, SH.
Let's not get to the part where both the CB and safety got beat yet.
We had Pollard with an INT his first year with the Texans on a play like this.
We rolled Pollard out without the QB suspecting it.
The QB thought the receiver had the CB beat, and Pollard ended up with an INT.
Every time the CB play this kind of leverage, we should expect some kind of safety help.
Sometimes we bait the offense into an INT, sometimes we lose.
If the D doesn't bait, the CB should play the receiver closer - and not the ball, like Cason did here.
At any rate, the CB's real concern is a sideline route by the receiver.
What I said was that the safety at least will take care of the skinny post and the post route.
This gives the CB more leeway to play more aggressively.
He chose to play the ball to look for an INT, and like you said, if it was a better throw, it would have been a long completion.
Our friend here who was good enough to put up the vid, wanted to show how the CB was able to "locate the ball" and defended the play.
It wasn't so.
I said it's good as long as the coverage called for the safety to help over the top; otherwise, it's a long completion for the offense.
This is a totally different scenario from a CB playing from a real trail position, and that was what I tried to explain to the poster who I gave plenty of kudos for putting up the vid.
We can see that if the CB was truly on an island with the receiver here, a good pass downfield and he would have been toast by "locating the ball".
A few other posters also agreed, locating the ball by turning the head needs to be done judicially, when the CB is in good position, otherwise he stands to lose much more often (it works sometimes on bad throws though - but that kind of defense is based on hope, if you know what I mean.)