PHILLYTEXANFAN
Saddle Up Partner
Cowboys v Pats SB with Boys winning
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
It was bad officiating across the board. Among others Mike Perreira's noted there should have been a roughing the kicker call against the Lions. Bad game for the refs wit bad calls and non calls both ways.
It wasn't just a pass interference, -----it was defensive holding and PI on the same play.
And u pick up the flag mm. Kay![]()
Wtf?
It was bad officiating across the board. Among others Mike Perreira's noted there should have been a roughing the kicker call against the Lions. Bad game for the refs wit bad calls and non calls both ways.
The way the refs cheated them out of that interference call and then called like 4 straight penalties on the Lions on that next drive to keep the drive alive twice on 3rd and 4th down was way to obvious. Horrible to watch. Momentum is everything in the playoffs, and the refs won that game. The Lions simply lost to the refs.
This was a controversial call by the officials, to say the least. So the question is, how big was this call on the outcome of the game? The Cowboys went on to win, but that doesn't mean the call caused DET to lose with certainty. Either outcome was still possible after the call. We need to think of things probabilistically. Let's break down the effect of the official's call using the new Win Probability Model. After picking up the flag, DET had a 0.672 win probability (WP). Had the pass interference penalty been enforced, DET had a 0.794 WP, a difference of about 0.12 WP or 12 percentage points. That's a big play, but not decisive. To put it in perspective, Stafford's 21-yard pass to Fuller in the 4th quarter to get out from under the shadow of DET's own end zone was worth 0.10 win probability added (WPA). Stafford's 19-yard pass to Johnson in the 3rd quarter on 3rd and 9 was a 0.11 WPA play.
A 0.10 WPA play is a significant event, and although I don't mean to minimize the unprecedented nature of that non-penalty, DET still had the upper hand in the game following the call. But if I were a Lions fan I'd have some very strong feelings about the way that game unfolded, and I think I'd have good reason to be upset.
The Lions were up by two TDs at one point in the game. One play did not cause them to lose. That's just a cop-out, and I'm far from a Cowboys fan.
I saw bad officiating all game that both sides could bitch and whine about today.
At the end of the day, though, the Lions choked away a two score lead. It's that simple.
Nice analysisI know bad calls effect games. As old Oiler fans here, we all remember January 6, 1980 in Pittsburgh, a day that shall live in infamy.
At the risk of being called a Cowboy Hater which seems to be the favorite phrase of Dallas fans, I offer my assessment of the controversial play.
I think it is beyond debate that the Dallas defender was holding the jersey of the Lion receiver, thus defensive holding should have been called. It is reasonable to say the Lion receiver made contact with the facemask of the Dallas defender.
The DPI is irrelevant at this point because the two fouls noted above would be offsetting nullifying the play. It would be 3rd & 1 for Detroit.
But since DPI was called on the play, it prompted Dez Bryant to come on to the field of play without his helmet to protest the call. This is an unsportsmanlike penalty that was not called. If it happened after the whistle was blown, the play would be dead and this would be a dead ball foul and I may be incorrect here, but I believe that would not be involved in the two offsetting calls and the Lions would be awarded with a 15 yard penalty and 1st down.
If my understanding of the unsportsmanlike penalty is incorrect, the correct call should have been offsetting penalties and a 3rd and 1 for the Lions.
Article 14:
Twisting, Pulling, or Turning the Facemask.
No player shall grasp and control,
twist, turn, push, or pull the
facemask of an opponent in any direction.
Note: If a player grasps an opponent’s facemask, he must immediately release it. If he does not immediately release it and
controls his opponent, it is a foul.
Penalty: For twisting, turning, pushing, pulling,
or controlling the mask: Loss of 15 yards. The player may be
disqualified if the action is flagrant. If the foul is by the defense, it is also an automatic first down
Section 3
Unsportsmanlike Conduct
Article 1: Prohibited Acts
(h) Removal of his helmet by a player in the field of play or the end zone
during a celebration or demonstration, or during a confrontation with a game official or any other player.
http://www.nfl.com/rulebook
But since DPI was called on the play, it prompted Dez Bryant to come on to the field of play without his helmet to protest the call. This is an unsportsmanlike penalty that was not called. If it happened after the whistle was blown, the play would be dead and this would be a dead ball foul and I may be incorrect here, but I believe that would not be involved in the two offsetting calls and the Lions would be awarded with a 15 yard penalty and 1st down.
I think it's gonna be the Cowgirls against Neck beard and the Colts. I don't think they are the best teams, but I see those two O-Lines get away with the worst tackles, uh I mean holds, uh I mean best blocking. You could throw in a couple of mysterious 3rd down penalties that keep thier drives alive as well.
Luck and Romo get an extra second or two on most plays.
I'm just sayin.......
The refs should have given Detroit some Vaseline.
As a Cowboy fan I admit we got lucky in some respects. It was a PI or a hold. It was a hold on Suh. Heck I thought Tyron Smith hooked the Lions players and held big as hell on the last TD. But if there was a conspiracy why would they give the Lions a two TD advantage to start? There were also a lot of questionable calls against the Cowboys early. Those saying that Dallas got every call down the stretch...true it seems. But the two PI/holding calls were legit. The RB got tackled and the other guy was held big time. Overall the refs/umps were subpar and horrible all around. On the last Lions drive I'd say that if you add the facemask pull....which is an auto penalty...on the TE and the hold before that you get the Lions at 3rd and 1 a second time with off setting penalties. Still a better chance to put the game away but not automatic.
As a Cowboy fan I admit we got lucky in some respects. It was a PI or a hold. It was a hold on Suh. Heck I thought Tyron Smith hooked the Lions players and held big as hell on the last TD. But if there was a conspiracy why would they give the Lions a two TD advantage to start? There were also a lot of questionable calls against the Cowboys early. Those saying that Dallas got every call down the stretch...true it seems. But the two PI/holding calls were legit. The RB got tackled and the other guy was held big time. Overall the refs/umps were subpar and horrible all around. On the last Lions drive I'd say that if you add the facemask pull....which is an auto penalty...on the TE and the hold before that you get the Lions at 3rd and 1 a second time with off setting penalties. Still a better chance to put the game away but not automatic.
So the NFL wants the Cowboys in the SB
When I read this thread's title, I think the NFL wants to make money. Lots of it.
And the Cowboys winning a SB would certainly be good for business. The Cowboys travel well, and their gear would sell like crazy if they won it all.
So, in that regard, the NFL "wants the Cowboys in the SB", just like they want any of their big market premier teams in the SB. It's good for their bottom line.
However, the day that we find out that the league is actively influencing games with official calls and stacking the deck, is the day that I quit being an NFL fan. I would no longer be able to watch the product if the outcome is nothing more than a predetermined agenda like pro wrestling.
I have to believe that the games themselves still have integrity and outcomes are determined by the players and coaches themselves. Otherwise, it would all be quite pointless to me.
So the NFL wants the Cowboys in the SB
(on the call on the field after Dez Bryant caught the ball at the 1-yard line) “The call was a completed catch down at the 1-yard line…which is why it was a coach’s challenge as opposed to a booth review, because it was still a ruling down on the field of play.”
(on if he (McCarthy) was challenging whether it was a catch) “Yes.”
(on what was the determining factor in calling that an incomplete pass) “Although the receiver is possessing the football, he must maintain possession of that football throughout the entire process of the catch. In our judgment, he maintained possession but continued to fall and never had another act common to the game. We deemed that by our judgment to be the full process of the catch, and at the time he lands and the ball hits the ground, it comes loose as it hits the ground, which would make that incomplete; although he re-possesses it, it does contact the ground when he reaches so the repossession is irrelevant because it was ruled an incomplete pass when we had the ball hit the ground.”
(on if Bryant’s elbow hit the ground before the ball did) “When you’re still going through the process of the catch, elbows or knees are irrelevant, he must complete that entire process with the football, maintain possession throughout.”
(so it was clear to both you and New York that the ball did hit the ground?) “Correct.”
(on if he was able to see the ball hitting the ground on multiple angles) “Yes, there were a couple of angles that show the ball actually hitting the ground and then the receiver losing possession of it as well.”
(on who makes the final decision on the call, is it New York or is it a joint decision) “It’s a joint decision (between the game officials and Vice President of Officiating Dean Blandino in New York). Now we’re fortunate to have the ability to communicate with New York and have additional input, which helps with judgment, as a referee on the field and in the booth, to be able to have that communication. It’s a joint effort.”
(on the unnecessary roughness call on T.J. Lang) “The play had ended, forward progress was ruled, the officials were blowing their whistle well after forward progress was ruled, so now you have the play ending because of the progress. Once that play ends, and there was a more than a very brief period of time, there was an extended period of time after the ruling of forward progress, then you had an unnecessary roughness penalty, so that down counts. Because it was finished, completely finished, it wasn’t an act immediately after it was down, there was space in between, so now that down will count. The 15-yard penalty takes it back to the 22-yard line, that’s why we had third down as opposed to second down, or have a foul that would have repeated the down.”
Yeah, what happened this week? The NFL changed their minds? Or is that ref getting called up from the league office and getting chewed out? Everyone knows the league was dying to have the Cowboys in the SB.
[IMGwidthsize="650"]https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/10922709_10202481019146400_2939502604749229436_n.jpg?oh=e1aa1f61f61313e0b0a5898896171da5&oe=5535E969&__gda__=1428699964_137af791632a39c3e1499974798b8541[/IMG]
Wonder what the refs were looking at on that play? The ball hit the ground twice there, they looked at it and still called it a catch. Maybe the NFL wants Mr. MVP in the Super Bowl.
Waahhhhhhhh, Waahhhhhhhh ! Yep right on cue, cry-baby Cowboys fans, playing their role as the most insufferable fan base out there and Karma is a ***** isn't it after that gift in the Lions game, thank god we won't have to hear about them being in the SB this year, maybe they can make it sometime this centruy ? Mean while all they've done lately is to make it to the divisional round of the POs and lose, sonmething the Texans have already done a couple times this century.
Maybe the NFL wants Mr. MVP in the Super Bowl.