Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
I think they should. He might be the missing link in fixing the desperate OL problem. We lost Ninja, who was so mean he used to set up thumb tacks in the electric chaiir, so why not put up with RI?
I voted yes because his issues are fixable.
Really?
I think they should. He might be the missing link in fixing the desperate OL problem. We lost Ninja, who was so mean he used to set up thumb tacks in the electric chaiir, so why not put up with RI?
1st, McNair wouldn't tolerate the circus-type attention he would bring
2nd, he ain't really very good (maybe that should be first). Anybody who's whole game is primarily based on getting under your skin has no real talent or they wouldn't have to resort to bush league mind games
3rd, with the negative attention he's brought on himself, every time he does something that looks halfway suspect, he's going to draw a penalty flag.
so not just no but hell no
I voted yes because his issues are fixable. It is not drug or rape related however the team leaders should have a strong input. He is a good talent and can be coached for a positive part of our team.
There is a small but vocal portion of the fanbase thst believes the Texans need a "bad boy" element on the team in order to be successful. That's why we have to see ridiculous questions like this posed every time some misfit becomes avaliable.
I don't care how good a player he potentially is, the media circus he'll bring with him isn't worth it. He'll be a distraction, not help.
If players cant handle media attention then they're mental weaklings and the kid of players you cant win a SB with anyways. But those kinds ok players are generally great kids.
I've had enough of the great kids era. It's time to start getting the winning kids kind of players. If these great kids are great players. great. If these kids are not great kids but great players then sign me up.
Kids gonna do what kids do.
If players cant handle media attention then they're mental weaklings and the kid of players you cant win a SB with anyways. But those kinds ok players are generally great kids.
I've had enough of the great kids era. It's time to start getting the winning kids kind of players. If these great kids are great players. great. If these kids are not great kids but great players then sign me up.
Kids gonna do what kids do.
Agreed. Some people think the Raiders misfits of the seventies is the only way to produce a winner. But where is Oakland now and how many winners had this kind of element? It's a false premise which needs to be shot down at every sighting.There is a small but vocal portion of the fanbase thst believes the Texans need a "bad boy" element on the team in order to be successful. That's why we have to see ridiculous questions like this posed every time some misfit becomes avaliable.
I don't care how good a player he potentially is, the media circus he'll bring with him isn't worth it. He'll be a distraction, not help.
.....and Incognito did what kids do. Also, what he did was beyond politically incorrect. If all he did was something "politically incorrect" I wouldn't care and neither would the media. So, you want a guy with VERY average talent plus the media circus, potentially to the detriment of the team as a whole? Sounds like you want a bad guy in there just for the sake of having a bad guy.
Agreed. Some people think the Raiders misfits of the seventies is the only way to produce a winner. But where is Oakland now and how many winners had this kind of element? It's a false premise which needs to be shot down at every sighting.
For the recod I don't want Incognito on the Texans. Not because of the reasons like media circus etc.. and I think Incognito is still an above avg LG. However I don't think the Texans are in need of a LG. So they're not a good match.
However my philosophy stands and until McNair changes his philosophy, (Not likely) The Texans will always be behind teams like the Pats/Broncos/Seahawks/SF etc.... who have my philosophy. One that is they will take on any player that will help them win.
He got dropped because of what he did to his own players.As much as i dislike the guy i do think he would make our offensive line better, why should i care how he treats opposing teams players...
Bingo.Moot issue because we don't need help at guard (especially after using the 33rd overall pick in the Draft for one), what we need is help at tackle, specifically RT.
If players cant handle media attention then they're mental weaklings and the kid of players you cant win a SB with anyways. But those kinds ok players are generally great kids.
I've had enough of the great kids era. It's time to start getting the winning kids kind of players. If these great kids are great players. great. If these kids are not great kids but great players then sign me up.
Kids gonna do what kids do.
If he was such a "winning kid," he would be signed already.
The guy was the least likable player in the league not named Cortland Finnegan and that was *before* the whole saga with the Dolphins.
He's a repulsive, wretched excuse for a human being. Calling him excrement is a compliment.
I'd rather they sign Terrell Owens and Jeff Garcia...and I'd be against that (for the record). I think the long and short of the issue is that Incognito is too big a dumbass to sign, regardless of talent.
However my philosophy stands and until McNair changes his philosophy, (Not likely) The Texans will always be behind teams like the Pats/Broncos/Seahawks/SF etc.... who have my philosophy. One that is they will take on any player that will help them win.
They would at least address a need.
If Incognito was a little less of a moron and played RT then I'd be curious and maybe willing to entertain the idea.
Maybe.
Probably not though.
Your philosophy is to carp about McNair and Smith no matter what they do. While saying no on Incognito you still use it as proof of inferiority. Of course if they signed him and the entirely predictable personal foul occurred at a critical juncture then Smith and McNair would be wrong for taking a stupid risk on an obvious miscreant.
Oh I dunno.... Can Cak belt out "Dream On"... or "Sweet Emotion"??Performance based industry need performers (I mean, would you go to a Aerosmith concert if Infantrycak stood in for the lead singer?) .
to see him rocking a giant flat-top mullet would be priceless.Oh I dunno.... Can Cak belt out "Dream On"... or "Sweet Emotion"??
...and how much are the tickets going for? It might be worth a ten-spot just to see him with long hair...
![]()
to see him rocking a giant flat-top mullet would be priceless.
to see him rocking a giant flat-top mullet would be priceless.
In light of your comments and ObsiWan said I have to say "Yes. I'd absolutely go to an Aerosmith concert with infantrycak on lead vocals".
![]()
The flat top mullet I'd do for free but y'all would be paying me not to sing.
In today's game Mean Joe Green would be in a world of trouble and no Coke Commercials.
Yep, it's not just a bad boy thing it's does the bad boy have enough talent to help me not have to see another 2-14 season again. If that is the case anybody that has the talent not named Aaron Hernandez come on down to H-town. After all the country club that McNair/Kubiak ran around here for the last 9 yrs has proven where good kids with great character get you. (David Anderson/Keo etc...) Even though the Texans play on Sunday NRG isn't a Church and the field isn't a Sunday school class.
Taylor Lewan has an assault case from a bar fight coming up soon, would you want him starting at RT this yr? What Incognito did was nothing compared to what Lewan did.
If a guy has talent you take him deal with his issues and win football games. The fanbase will be happy with winning. Even though some around here still wish Kubiak was the HC so that tells me they have a different agenda and it isn't a do whatever it takes to win agenda.
If the need is big enough I'd (personally) give anyone a shot. I used to run a Ford store....hired a guy (salesman) with a bad reputation and fired him in the same week (I needed someone who could make a friggin' car deal). Office ladies didn't like that but it's a similar situation. Performance based industry need performers (I mean, would you go to a Aerosmith concert if Infantrycak stood in for the lead singer?) As long as the contract was structured for a rapid release upon dumbass move I think you could certainly justify the chance. Hell that's how they built the current Bengal team.
There are differences between charges and guilt. If he is found guilty, then he would also be on my no play list.
When weighing pros and cons, avoid the cons or soon to be cons.
See this is where we are different. Lewan got in a fight and beat somebody up. That aggression makes him a very good RT prospect. I'm not Sunday school teacher and I don't expect my OL to act like saints. What they do on THEIR personal time is their business.
Short of a Hernandez/Septien/Carruth type situation.
I just cannot agree on the bolded. I will not watch a player that hits his wife/g'friend or refuses to pay child support when he has the money. I will not watch a guy that keeps doing stupid stuff (DWIs, shop lift, etc) or detract from his (Incognito) team because he is a punk. I have no interest in thugs even Mean Joe and despised him as a player.See this is where we are different. Lewan got in a fight and beat somebody up. That aggression makes him a very good RT prospect. I'm not Sunday school teacher and I don't expect my OL to act like saints. What they do on THEIR personal time is their business.
Short of a Hernandez/Septien/Carruth type situation.