Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Rise and Fall of Combine

Why is it that some rookies are crowned after having a successful first year but others aren't ?

personal agenda ?
especially since the MAIN reason mcneill fell to the 2nd round was because of a spinal cord issue. teams aren't sure how long he'll last in the NFL. everyone thought he'd be good, no question about it.
 
Crowder really helped himself today with a 4.69 at 6'4" 272 with 32 reps. That's beastly. Crowder's helped by the way Texas DL like Rogers, Hampton, and Redding have outperformed expectations, too. 19 TFL, 10.5 sacks in 2006. Impressed at Senior Bowl. Perfect fit opposite Mario, real speed rusher who can go inside too. Windfall if available in round 2.
 
Brian Robison's 4.66, 27 reps, 40.5 vertical, also helps him. Size and durability at end are an issue, but he'll help somebody tremendously.
 
Why is it that some rookies are crowned after having a successful first year but others aren't ?

personal agenda ?

He got crowned because he didn't give up a sack at AUB, and he earned a spot in the Pro-Bolw last season as a rookie. I'm not saying he's a HoF guy or anything, but he deserves whatever crown he's wearing with his play up to this point.
 
He got crowned because he didn't give up a sack at AUB, and he earned a spot in the Pro-Bolw last season as a rookie. I'm not saying he's a HoF guy or anything, but he deserves whatever crown he's wearing with his play up to this point.

That still doesn't answer my question.

Again....


Why do some rookies get crowned after a good rookie year, but others don't ?

Personal agenda?
 
not sure what you mean exactly. are you saying like ESPN crowns players after one year or certain members of this forum.
 
not sure what you mean exactly. are you saying like ESPN crowns players after one year or certain members of this forum.

People in general.

I won't name any particular players.

But why is it that some players are crowned after early success, but others are viewed wearily? You even hear phrases like, "they'll figure him out"

I guess what I'm asking is, when is a year enough eveidence to label a player ? When can one year's worth of play be used as evidence that said player will be great ?

Is it a positional thing ? Is it a "how well did they perform thing" ? Or.....Is it just personal agenda ?
 
in the case of vince young, his early success mirrors michael vick's early success. pretty much the same player at this point. considering his inability to pick up an offense at texas, as well as his low intelligence, it's safe to assume for me that he's not getting better.
 
in the case of vince young, his early success mirrors michael vick's early success. pretty much the same player at this point. considering his inability to pick up an offense at texas, as well as his low intelligence, it's safe to assume for me that he's not getting better.

Ha Ha....

Classic.
 
If R. Taylor or L Booker are there for the taking in the fourth I hope our GM sprints to the forum. Either one would be fine with me there.

I agree that the Texans might want to take another look at their "boy scouts only" stance.

Taylor got caught with weed. (a little more than the average bear though).

I think he found the garden on the back forty at Texas University. :stirpot:

And they say A&M is the ag school. :shrug:

But it isn't like he is being questioned in a hit and run death, a triple shooting or beating up his girl friend.

:coffee:
 
If R. Taylor or L Booker are there for the taking in the fourth I hope our GM sprints to the forum. Either one would be fine with me there.

I agree that the Texans might want to take another look at their "boy scouts only" stance.

Taylor got caught with weed. (a little more than the average bear though).

I think he found the garden on the back forty at Texas University. :stirpot:

And they say A&M is the ag school. :shrug:

But it isn't like he is being questioned in a hit and run death, a triple shooting or beating up his girl friend.

:coffee:

Exactly, it could be worse. We all remember how college used to be. Who didn't do something stupid? Bro just got caught and it hurt his status. Fact is he can play, and on sundays that's all that matters.
 
Exactly, it could be worse. We all remember how college used to be. Who didn't do something stupid? Bro just got caught and it hurt his status. Fact is he can play, and on sundays that's all that matters.

Bit of a difference between a dime bag and a 5 lb brick of weed. Combined the Texans concern of character issues it's pretty safe to say that Taylor will not be a Texan.
 
If R. Taylor or L Booker are there for the taking in the fourth I hope our GM sprints to the forum. Either one would be fine with me there.

I agree that the Texans might want to take another look at their "boy scouts only" stance.

Taylor got caught with weed. (a little more than the average bear though).

I think he found the garden on the back forty at Texas University. :stirpot:

And they say A&M is the ag school. :shrug:

But it isn't like he is being questioned in a hit and run death, a triple shooting or beating up his girl friend.

:coffee:

agreed. Beat your wife, use roids, maybe some petty theft, a few DUI's, get involved in a murder case, maybe a suspension and a few frowns.

But jeeze smoke some pot in the NFL and you are done.
 
Bit of a difference between a dime bag and a 5 lb brick of weed. Combined the Texans concern of character issues it's pretty safe to say that Taylor will not be a Texan.

I don't think it's as clear cut as that, otherwise I don't think they'd have even wasted brain cells interviewing him.

Why interview a player you know you aren't going to take when you could have used that interview on someone who could possibly make your team ?
 
The combine is not the last chance for some of these guys. Some will have pro days. I think the Texans might take Taylor. They interview him, and that says alot. And about character, maybe Kubiak and Co. put less emphasis on it than the last group. Just a few thoughts.
 
Patrick Willis ran an 4.49 forty at the NFL Combine Monday, according to the NFL Network.

Patrick Willis - 4.49
Timmons - 4.59
Jon Beason - 4.64
Paul Posluszny - 4.68
Antwan Barnes - 4.40 with 31 reps
Quincy Black - 4.42
Zak Deossie - 4.53
David Harris - 4.53


Posluzny stock has taken a nose dive at the combine and there is good chance he will be available to us in 2nd. He was out performed by his own team mate.

Willis has solidify being selected in early teens. His stock has gone up considerably.

Alan Branch has also taken a nose dive and now they think he has slipped all the way down to lower 1/3 of the first round.

Adam Carriker - 6'6" 292lbs., did 33 reps on bench, had a 33 1/2" vertical, 4.9 forty, and a 4.14 shuttle (average LB time was 4.25). His stock has gone way up and some are saying that SF might draft him as their 34 LB.
 
That still doesn't answer my question.

Again....


Why do some rookies get crowned after a good rookie year, but others don't ?

Personal agenda?

He did almost everything possible for a rookie his first year. Was on the best team in the NFL, helped set the TD record for his running back, got his QB into the ProBowl, made it in the Pro Bowl himself. He was one of few high pick rookies who experianced individual and team success, sounds like a good recipe for getting "crowned".
 
I also don't think the Texans are taking Peterson at #8, even if he falls there. Word on the street is that Ramonce Taylor is 'high' on our list at RB. I wouldn't be surprised if the Texans talk McNair out of his 'high character player' mentality just for this guy.

1- LaRon Landry
2- Robert Meachem or Ryan Harris
3- Ryan Harris or Samson Satele
4- Ramonce Taylor
4- Desmond Bishop
5- David Ball, if Meachem isn't available in RD 2; if we get Meachem, then go with Michael Coe
6- still thinking
7- Oscar Lua

Interesting Chriss with all of your talk of mediocre tallent, you sellect the one who showed the worst at the Senrior bowl and helped him self the least at the combine. So your starting Line up now consists of Salaam, Pitts, Flannery/Hodgen, Weary and Erick Winston. Just who on this line does Harris replace ?
 
Back
Top