gpshafer_1976 said:
I'm still 50-50 on whether Bob McNair is going to be a good owner or not.
I have to see it to believe it. Some of what Nighthawk says, I can sort of relate to: If the guy is such a good businessman...why does he not get rid of the dead weight? It's a very legitimate question if you ask me. In any other line of work, a guy like Capers would have been gone QUICKLY. So why the good sportsmanship?
......Hopefully Mcnair is a little bit of both. However, I have to admit that seeing the moves this team has made: Getting Buchanon and giving away draft picks, Being under the cap by how many millions of dollars?, and Not getting Orlando Pace to protect your "franchise QB's" backside, and many other penny pinching moves in terms of personnel, you gotta' scratch your head a little bit and think what if this is the best that it gets? Are we in store for another decade-long run of the Astros Part II where only recently do you see the tightfisted owner open up a little to really make a run at the title?
I can't bash McNair just yet, but this offseason will prove to me just how much of a "real" chance this team will ever have in terms of seriously contending for a title. Can't exactly say that I feel confident in his ownership as things currently stand.
My splanation. It may not be the right splanation but its how I've seen it. This is a weird season for the team. High expectations. Ugly preseason, but sometimes that doesn't translate--though in our case it did. Our early season schedule has been absolutely brutal--one of the hardest in the league.
What gets you fired pretty quick is when you lose to a bunch of dog teams. So, if our season was reversed, with the easy teams up front, and we lost to them, it might have got Capers canned quick.
What happened is early in the season our QB kept getting killed, and our O looked terrible. The defense looked bad too but you wondered how much of that was being on the field after so many 3 and outs. Palmer gets sacked because there was another reasonable option in the fold--Pendry. He gets a bit of rope because it takes a bit of time to figure out stuff but even still, the Texans face a bunch of tough Ds.
Injuries injuries injuries to key players during a rough part of the schedule make it kinda harsh to nix your coach too. (Yeah, every team has injuries, but all our rookie starters and players new to the team, the Texans have about as much depth as Jessica Simpson).
So, by the time you get to the easier parts of the schedule, it gets kinda pointless to can the head coach because you really don't have anyone better to step in. McNair said it plainly in the Chronic--you replace when you have a better replacement. Personally, I still think the team is playing hard for the coaches, but a team has to be a team--everybody has to do their part and play together and when the parts fail, it don't look so pretty. A play here or there really makes a difference.
So, that is my sum up to date. Why a reasonable person might have made the decision to keep pat until the end of the season. I don't think it has anything to do with class or good sportsmanship, but rather not knowing if the team was playing poorly due the competition faced or because of injuries or because of the scheme. And by the time the writing was on the wall, it was kinda pointless to make a change. Cuz it wouldn't really accomplish much.
As for the offseason moves, it is easy to slam them in retrospect, but at the time, a lot of folks were pretty excited about them.
Pbuc--just look at some of the old threads. It was a demonstration that the Texans were concerned with shoring up the dbs. They took a risk, and the risk did not pan out. Heck, 790am was so excited about that pickup they gave Pbuc his own radio show.
Orlando Pace--The Texans tried to get him. We couldn't stop the Rams from matching. Riley wasn't the answer, but the Texans were trying to find what they could get. Starting LT don't fall outta trees, but if they did, they would leave really big craters in the ground, I suppose.
"Penny Pinching Personnel"--I am not sure we will know the whole story with why different people were hired or not hired, but if you look at who we have on our coaching/draft staff, we have a good number of people who have experienced success throughout the league. Folks might want to call them castoffs, but if you coach long enough, most people get canned. It is just the deal.
Staying Flexible Under the Cap--That is a Casserly thing, not a McNair thing.
I haven't seen too many examples of Mr. McNair being tight fisted--in fact, more often than not, I've seen him demonstrate a great willingness to spend money to make money and a great personal generousity. (Katrina relief, for example).
Obviously, it is early in his history as an owner, but throwing him under the bus as a cheapskate owner--well, I don't see it. At the end of the season, we may not end up getting the coach we want but I am guessing it won't be because the wheelbarrow of money wasn't there--it just may be that nobody of note wants to take the risks inherent with dealing with a baby franchise.