disaacks3 said:
C'mon guys, Is this horse DEAD YET or what? BOTH players are exceptional physical specimens w/ great gifts for the game at the Collegiate level. Nobody knows for SURE that either will succeed at the next level - whether it be due to an unforseen injury, inability to adapt to the Pro game, or simply never getting the chance to Excel due to a crummy supporting cast.
Agreed
disaacks3 said:
It is inherently EASIER for a running-back to be 'plugged in' to an existing NFL offense than it is for a QB. Anyone who can't understand this simple concept should leave this discussion before they embarass themselves.
Not really. If you've got........ say a Brad Johnson, and a Deshaun Foster. It will be just as easy to just stick either of them into your offense. But if you've got a RB that's going to change the game, or a QB that will change the game, it isn't necessarily inherently easier to install the RB. For instance, if Vince were to go to NewOrleans, where the majority of plays are from the Shotgun(with last years team, and last years coach), there is very little for Vince to adjust to. Same with Tennessee, though they didn't use the shotgun as much, it was a big part of their game. Denver is also a system, IMHO, that Vince can step right into, since they already move the Quarterback around, to help with protection. Then you've got the bad teams, with "a bunch of wholes", who will be getting new coaches, new offensive systems, and have unproven QBs......... you can't really get much worse with those teams. The QB has to learn the new system. The Offense has to learn a new system. SanFran, Detroit, Oakland, N.O. (again), Vince, I think will do just as well starting in Sept on those teams as the young QBs expected to one day take over those teams....... with the expception of possibly Brees.
disaacks3 said:
Does VY present a "possibility" of a mold-shattering QB? Yes! Unfortunately, that's part of the problem. A "normal" Pro-style offense would need to be redesigned to take care of VY's unique gifts. No such adjustment need be made for a running back (ANY running back).
Ricky Williams & Ron Dayne, weren't immediately successful, becuase I think they weren't designed right for them.
Vince Young will be just as successful in a regular Pro Offense(think McNabb, Culpepper, Quincy Carter, Steve Mcnair, Steve Young) as Reggie would be in a team that uses him like they use every other running back in the league. IF you're only going to hand the ball off to Reggie, or throw him screens, he's got a decent shot at being successful. But you aren't utilizing his special talents.
You put Vince in a regular offense, and he has the same chances of being successful. He's shown that he is fairly accurate, and if you extrapolate his YPA by the extra number of attempts Lienart had, Vince actually eclipses Matt's passing yards his senior season. Just like McNabb, Culpepper, McNair, and Vick, the only adjustment that needs to be made, is in deciding when to get rid of the ball. "Normal" QBs have a clock in their heads. after so much time, they need to scrap a play, and start thinking about getting rid of the ball. The more athletic QBs clock tells them when it is time to abandon the pocket, and buy some time for your reciever.
Anybody thinking about designing an offense for Vince to run bootlegs & QB Draws all day needs to be run out of here.......... that, I agree with.
disaacks3 said:
Picking VY means giving up on CARR. Fine, you say? What about this year folks? Is Carr's confidence shaky? Sure, wouldn't
yours be if you weren't given any real protection, even after your GM and coach publicly announced that it was their first priority?
What a better way to show your confidence in him by using your 1st pick in the draft on not only something that has NO CHANCE of helping him succeed, but only shows a complete about-face to the recent extension you gave him! Yep, that just sounds like a GREAT plan.
For four years now, we've been saying our #1 priority is to protect the QB. We've done nothing different so far this year to address the problem. & one of our offensive line draft picks was picked up quickly and penciled in as a starter for another Pro Team. To me, that says the problem wasn't the players on the offensive line. If the only new starter we see come September is Flanagan, I hope some of you

s, will admit that a lot of the problem wears the number 8 on his sleeve.
disaacks3 said:
Vince, in ANY Pro system isn't ready for the NFL game yet. If you're a true VY fan, and you'd rather not see him beaten down and injured his 1st season, pray he goes to a team w/ an aging vet QB on the decline where he can ease into the system. Not behind a 5th year guy (ALSO a #1 pick, for those who've forgotten), whose confidence you've just shot to he*, and in the first year of a new coaching staff.
I take no responsibilty whatsoever in what has happened to David Carr. Just like I doubt many Browns fans take responsibilty for what happened to Couch, or Detroit fans take for Harrington, or SanDiego fans for Leaf.
But I also wouldn't start any QB his first year. not even Lienart, if I've got an $8mil takling dummy itching to get on the field and prove he's worth the cash.
I think all QBs should be eased into the game. & Because I like David Carr, he'll get the first 8 starts, no questions asked, no matter who I draft... Vince, Cutler, Omar, McNeil, Brady......... whoever.
But... Vince(or whoever I draft...... or Rosenfels/Ragone) will work the sidelines with me, if I were coach. I'll call the play, he'll tell me what he would expect, what keys we are looking for in the defense. he tells me when he identifies them, and what those keys should mean to our play. On defense, he & Carr would go over pictures brought down from the booth, with my QB coach... they'll both listen to what he sees, and what adjustments need to be made, if there are any tells by any of the players, etc.... When we go back on offense, Vince(or whoever) we'll come back to me, and demonstrate that he understood everything the QB coach went over.
disaacks3 said:
Reggie Bush is a 'safer' pick and has no real downside, unless you think DD is going to get demoralized by someone to 'share the load' with? Yep, I'd HATE the idea of sharing the load and reducing my chance for injury. Give DD some credit. He's watched Denver too and seen the platoon system they used. Please tell me it occurs to others that DD just MIGHT imagine that Denver's former offensive coordinator (that's his new HC) might like the idea of platooning RB's too? :brickwall I really like DD too, but adding another multi-purpose weapon to this Offensive unit can only make it better. As a fan, I'm more interested in the team as a whole than how big DD's next contract will be.
DD's had people here to share the load with him. They just weren't being used that way. I also don't believe it's a matter of DD not being able to carry the load. get him in Denver's running system, get him into the secondary untouched, and he'll start 16 games, with at least 25 carries.