Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

HOF Game Cancelled

Most tickets have a limit of liability clause set at face value. Somewhat redundant they also often have a no consequential damages clause.

Cak,

Looks like you are correct concerning the language behind our typical NFL game tickets. It appears that the Hall of Fame for whatever reason printed tickets that didn't include this language of "protection."
jill61-603505-albums-emoticons-pic47441-confused-head-scratch-smiley.gif


Hall of Fame ticket doesn’t limit liability to refund
August 11, 2016, 6:05 PM EDT


A common public response to the Hall of Fame Non-Game litigation is that the language on the back of the ticket limits the liability of the NFL and/or the Hall of Fame to a refund in the event the game isn’t played. Lawyer Michael Avenatti, who filed a class-action lawsuit against the league and the Hall of Fame on Thursday due to the cancellation of the game, disputes this perception.

“The tickets contained no such applicable limitation and nothing to suggest that if the event was cancelled, all fans would receive is a refund,” Avenatti told PFT. “In this regard, the tickets are not even as ‘protective’ as other NFL related tickets.”

Avenatti cited Super Bowl XLV as an example; he filed more than five years ago a lawsuit seeking full compensation for all losses incurred by fans who showed up for the championship game in Dallas between the Steelers and Packers with tickets to seats that weren’t ready for use.

Here’s the full language, from the back of a ticket purchased by a Hall of Fame Game customer through etix.com: “This ticket is a revocable license and may be taken up and admission refused upon refunding the purchase price appearing hereon is grounds for seizure and cancellation without compensation. Holder of this ticket voluntarily assumes all risks and danger incidental to the game or event for which this ticket is issued whether occurring prior to, during, or after same and agrees that the organization, venue, presenter, agents, participants, players or ETIX are not responsible or liable for any injuries arising from such causes. Holder agrees by use of this ticket not to transmit or aid in transmitting any description, account, picture, or reproduction of the game or event to which this ticket is issued. Breach of the foregoing will automatically terminate this license. Holder agrees that the license comprised by this ticket may be removed and the holder ejected from the game or event for which this ticket is issued in the event that holder violates any law, ordinance or venue regulation. Holder grants permission to organization sponsoring the game or event for which this ticket is issued to utilize the holder’s image in connection with any video or other transmission or reproduction of the which to which this ticket relates.”

The ticket also says, in all capitals, “NO REFUNDS, NO EXCHANGE EVENT DATE, TIME AND TICKET PRICE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.”

The Hall of Fame already has offered to refund the face value of tickets purchased for the game, but nothing more.

If the back of the ticket contained language limiting the Hall of Fame’s liability to a refund in the event the game isn’t played for reasons due to the negligence of the Hall of Fame or the NFL, it probably wouldn’t have been enforceable. Terms printed on the back of a ticket are commonly referred to as “contracts of adhesion,” which customers must accept without any opportunity to negotiate, alter, or even be aware of the language before buying the ticket.

In this case, it doesn’t matter. The language on the back of the Hall of Fame Game ticket doesn’t limit liability in the event of a cancellation of the event due to any event, including incompetence by the people responsible for getting the field ready.


The above language contrasts to the typical NFL game ticket (an example I found below: Buffalo Bills ticket)


THE DATE AND TIME OF THE GAME AS WELL THE OPPONENT ARE ALL SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY THE BILLS IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION OR AS A RESULT OF EVENTS BEYOND THE BILLS’ CONTROL, WITHOUT REFUND. NO REFUND OR OTHER REMEDY WILL BE PROVIDED IF THE TICKET HOLDER CANNOT ATTEND. IF A GAME IS CANCELLED AND NOT REPLAYED, THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY IS A REFUND OF THE FACE VALUE OF THE TICKET TO THE ORIGINAL PURCHASER OF THE TICKET AND THE TICKET HOLDER WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES OF ANY KIND.
 
Last edited:
HOF Game lawyer: “I know fraud occurred”


On Monday, the first tangible suggestion emerged that fraud occurred in connection with the cancellation of the Hall of Fame Game, with quotes from Colts punter Pat McAfee coupled with a statement from lawyer Michael Avenatti making it clear that, eventually, the lawsuit filed two weeks ago will be revised to assert deliberate deceit. The Hall of Fame thereafter called the accusation “totally baseless.” Appearing on Tuesday’s PFT Live, I asked Avenatti why he believes fraud happened.

“Well, I don’t believe fraud occurred, I know fraud occurred,” Avenatti said, “because people are coming out of the woodwork now and providing us with facts and evidence that shows no question that fraud occurred on behalf of the league and the Hall of Fame. The reason why we know that now is because, for instance, Pat McAfee on the morning after the game gave a podcast during which he described exactly what he witnessed in connection with the cancellation of the game. . . . The league and the Hall of Fame informed the players, ninety players to the Packers and ninety players for the Colts, at least an hour and a half before they told the fans that the game was cancelled. Then to make matters worse they told those same individuals not to say anything about it, to tweet about it, et cetera. They clearly tried to cover this up and keep it from the fans in the interest of money.”

The argument the Hall of Fame withheld the information from fans to keep them in the stadium, buying food, drink, programs, and other merchandise that otherwise wouldn’t have been sold.

“The Hall of Fame and the league have yet to provide an answer to the following very basic question. Why did you tell the players, personnel and ESPN that the game was cancelled but you waited an hour and a half, two hours to tell the fans? They don’t have an answer for that question. . . . Someone needs to pose this question again to the Hall of Fame and the NFL and ensure they answer it. Why didn’t you tell the fans at the same time you told ESPN and the players and why did it take you at least an hour and a half to do so? They haven’t answered that question. They don’t want to answer the question because the answer is ugly.”

Avenatti eventually will have a chance to force someone to answer the question, along with an opportunity to review phones and other electronic information for evidence that would provide the answer indirectly.

“We fully expect to uncover text messages demonstrating [fraud],” Avenatti said. “I will tell you this, and this has not been announced previously, we know for a fact that a text message was sent out to members of the Hall of Fame or individuals assisting the Hall of Fame with VIP guests informing them that the game was cancelled and also expressly telling them not to tell the fans. When we get our hands on that text message the NFL and the Hall of Fame have a serious, serious problem and we expect this to reach all the way to the top. We don’t believe that some middle manager made this decision. Commissioner Goodell and Mr. Baker, the head of the Hall of Fame, are going have a lot of explaining to do in connection with the case.”

The league and the Hall of Fame have done no specific explaining yet. Eventually, they’ll be required to do so within the confines of litigation that wasn’t settled last week.

“Too many people knew about this and too many people were involved with this, and now we’re learning the truth about the timeline and what really happened,” Avenatti said. “This is going to get very, very ugly for the league and the Hall of Fame as time progresses. They should have taken our $450 [per customer] offer. Instead, they decided they want to pay their lawyers millions and this is not going end well I can assure you that.”

It will likely take a while for it to end, given the speed with which civil litigation often moves, or doesn’t move. At some point, though, the truth will come out — whatever it may be.
LINK
 
Back
Top