if he were playing for the Colts he would be riding the pine bench and watching Manning take a defense apart.If Carr was playing for the Colts......I gaurantee you he would be a star! Too bad for him

Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
if he were playing for the Colts he would be riding the pine bench and watching Manning take a defense apart.If Carr was playing for the Colts......I gaurantee you he would be a star! Too bad for him
ArlingtonTexan said:The comment that helps know that something is up with Carr working with his protection scheme was McKinney's statement that the blocking was not as bad as it looked.
thegr8fan said:the intention of my reply, infantry, was that if the Colts would have drafted Carr 3 years ago, he would be a backup to Manning. That is it, plain and simple.
I don't play the woulda, coulda, shoulda, fantasy game of Manning playing in Houston and Carr playing on the Colts. But your scenario would be the most probable if that were to occur with a simple one for one trade of QB's.
I guess we just have a difference of opinion, just as McKinney and Billy Miller have a difference of opinion. From the Chronic:ArlingtonTexan said:...The comment that helps know that something is up with Carr working with his protection scheme was McKinney's statement that the blocking was not as bad as it looked...
I have an opinion of where "the real problem is". Again, we had a small window into what Carr looks like with protection. With a RB that was struggling and a defense trying to find it's way, Carr led the team to a 4-3 record. So, I'm convinced that Carr can be a winning QB given average protection. I'm also convinced that, as it stands, this offensive can't give that to him."I think the fans are frustrated, but I think they unfairly took it out on David," tight end Billy Miller said. "He's the leader of this team. He's the leader of our offense. You can't take it out on him. If all the fans want to come in and break down film with us and see on every play where the real problem is ...
thegr8fan said:if he were playing for the Colts he would be riding the pine bench and watching Manning take a defense apart.![]()
ArlingtonTexan said:That O-line he is behind is not a great line. Manning makes them look better with his ability to make quick decisions, a quick release, and stepping up in the pocket.
I am guess i fall into the category of "Carr hater" because i think he is going to always be inconsistent. he will have some great games and even good years, but as of now when he has time he makes too many poor decisions. he is best when he is out of the pocket and can either let it fly with one or two options or take off and run, but in the NFL QBs who consistently make a difference in the passing game do so from the pocket. He is a starting quality QB in the NFL, I just don't think he is an elite guy. Honestly, as a Texans fans I hope he proves me wrong. I will gladly eat that crow.
FILO_girl said:I said he was no Brett Favre. That is not hatin', it is a realistic look at this time. Didn't say he was bad, just not Brett. But then again, Brett is my fave player of all time so it will take someone mighty awesome to fit this description. David has the humility and family values, but needs more skills to get there. Brett needed more than 3 years to prove himself too.![]()
Give David some reliable protection and we will see a more confident and stronger QB. Hard to be tough when you have to beat feet or eat turf all the time. We do have a very mobile QB but really we don't want to see HOW mobile SO often!![]()
Is this what you were getting at Wonger?
TexansTrueFan said:Carr is GONNA be a great Quarter Back !!!
ronaldod1 said:The redskins got rid of gaffney for gods sake.
Well, that's quite a list.disaacks3 said:The list goes on, but you should get the idea. Can Carr develop into a QB of this high caliber? Time will tell. Right now, his mechanics are still poor (sidearm motion), his ability to read NFL defenses still needs to mature (and speed up!), his pocket presence is below average (he doesn't seem to sense defenders...only impending doom), and he can't read progressions fast enough yet (still locking on too much). There's also the issue of some passes that have had more hang-time than a Chad Stanley punt, and others forced into double, triple & quadruple coverage!
I stated his weaknesses at THIS TIME. Can you really put Carr on the level of any of those 3 QBs...no matter WHAT line he's behind?Lucky said:Really, is there any aspect of the game where you think Carr is adequate? So, what should the Texans do to remedy this? Dump Carr? Bring in a new QB coach? Hold a candlelight vigil? What's your solution, or is this just another opportunity to bash?
disaacks3 said:I swear some of the posters on here have been hanging out & doing some 'wacky weed' with Ricky Williams!
The comparison at the beginning of this thread should never have included Warren Moon - He was already a "pro" QB for several years before he came to the NFL. Nobody considered Kurt Warner a rookie coming from the Arena league....the CFL is a little tougher.
David Carr, at present, is not even close to any of these current QBs: (Note: this eval is O-Line independent)
Peyton Manning - Probably the finest "student of the game" in existence right now. He reads, reacts and calls plays at the line that Carr simply isn't capable of at this time.
Donovan McNabb - A QB that possesses superior size and physical strength. His scrambling ability is helped by the difficulty in bringing him down 1-on-1.
Brett Favre - Despite being "pick-prone" due to forcing the ball, can still take complete control of a game. Never gives up on the play, no matter how bad his protection has broken down. Probably the most dangerous QB (while scrambling) the NFL has ever seen.
The list goes on, but you should get the idea. Can Carr develop into a QB of this high caliber? Time will tell. Right now, his mechanics are still poor (sidearm motion), his ability to read NFL defenses still needs to mature (and speed up!), his pocket presence is below average (he doesn't seem to sense defenders...only impending doom), and he can't read progressions fast enough yet (still locking on too much). There's also the issue of some passes that have had more hang-time than a Chad Stanley punt, and others forced into double, triple & quadruple coverage!
Undoubtedly, the O-Line & injuries have greatly affected Carr's development in these areas. There have been times, however, that Carr has been the master of his own demise by scrambling out of an actual pocket and into oncoming defenders.
I too would like to see what David could do with a real OL, a "Complete" TE, and another "possession" WR. That said, he's got his own share of faults right now that need to be corrected before the whole team can improve. If you're not the Bucs or the Ravens from years past, your QB is still the most important cog in the machine, and the Texans are no different.![]()
disaacks3 said:
I swear some of the posters on here have been hanging out & doing some 'wacky weed' with Ricky Williams!
The comparison at the beginning of this thread should never have included Warren Moon - He was already a "pro" QB for several years before he came to the NFL. Nobody considered Kurt Warner a rookie coming from the Arena league....the CFL is a little tougher.
David Carr, at present, is not even close to any of these current QBs: (Note: this eval is O-Line independent)
Peyton Manning - Probably the finest "student of the game" in existence right now. He reads, reacts and calls plays at the line that Carr simply isn't capable of at this time.
Donovan McNabb - A QB that possesses superior size and physical strength. His scrambling ability is helped by the difficulty in bringing him down 1-on-1.
Brett Favre - Despite being "pick-prone" due to forcing the ball, can still take complete control of a game. Never gives up on the play, no matter how bad his protection has broken down. Probably the most dangerous QB (while scrambling) the NFL has ever seen.
texan279 said:Here are David's numbers for his first three years compared to other QB's, not too shabby.
David Carr '02-'04
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 2002 hou | 16 | 233 444 52.5 2592 5.8 9 15 | 59 282 3 |
| 2003 hou | 12 | 167 295 56.6 2013 6.8 9 13 | 27 151 2 |
| 2004 hou | 16 | 286 467 61.2 3539 7.6 16 14 | 72 303 0 |
John Elway '83-'85
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1983 den | 11 | 123 259 47.5 1663 6.4 7 14 | 28 146 1 |
| 1984 den | 15 | 214 380 56.3 2598 6.8 18 15 | 56 237 1 |
| 1985 den | 16 | 327 605 54.0 3891 6.4 22 23 | 51 253 0 |
Terry Bradshaw '70-'72
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1970 pit | 13 | 83 218 38.1 1410 6.5 6 24 | 32 233 1 |
| 1971 pit | 14 | 203 373 54.4 2259 6.1 13 22 | 53 247 5 |
| 1972 pit | 14 | 147 308 47.7 1887 6.1 12 12 | 58 346 7 |
Randall Cunningham '85-'87
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1985 phi | 6 | 34 81 42.0 548 6.8 1 8 | 29 205 0 |
| 1986 phi | 15 | 111 209 53.1 1391 6.7 8 7 | 66 540 5 |
| 1987 phi | 12 | 223 406 54.9 2786 6.9 23 12 | 76 505 3 |
Troy Aikman '89-'91
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1989 dal | 11 | 155 293 52.9 1749 6.0 9 18 | 38 302 0 |
| 1990 dal | 15 | 226 399 56.6 2579 6.5 11 18 | 40 172 1 |
| 1991 dal | 12 | 237 363 65.3 2754 7.6 11 10 | 16 5 1 |
Steve McNair '95-'97
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1995 hou | 6 | 41 80 51.2 569 7.1 3 1 | 11 38 0 |
| 1996 hou | 10 | 88 143 61.5 1197 8.4 6 4 | 31 169 2 |
| 1997 ten | 16 | 216 415 52.0 2665 6.4 14 13 | 101 674 8 |
Warren Moon '84-'86
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1984 hou | 16 | 259 450 57.6 3338 7.4 12 14 | 58 211 1 |
| 1985 hou | 14 | 200 377 53.1 2709 7.2 15 19 | 39 130 0 |
| 1986 hou | 15 | 256 488 52.5 3489 7.1 13 26 | 42 157 2 |
Joe Namath '65-'67
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1965 nyj | 13 | 164 340 48.2 2220 6.5 18 15 | 8 19 0 |
| 1966 nyj | 14 | 232 471 49.3 3379 7.2 19 27 | 6 42 2 |
| 1967 nyj | 14 | 258 491 52.5 4007 8.2 26 28 | 6 14 0 |
Phil Simms '79-'81
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1979 nyg | 12 | 134 265 50.6 1743 6.6 13 14 | 29 166 1 |
| 1980 nyg | 13 | 193 402 48.0 2321 5.8 15 19 | 36 190 1 |
| 1981 nyg | 10 | 172 316 54.4 2031 6.4 11 9 | 19 42 0 |
Fran Tarkenton '61-'63
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1961 min | 14 | 157 280 56.1 1997 7.1 18 17 | 56 308 5 |
| 1962 min | 14 | 163 329 49.5 2595 7.9 22 25 | 41 361 2 |
| 1963 min | 14 | 170 297 57.2 2311 7.8 15 15 | 28 162 1 |
Steve Young '85-'87
| Passing | Rushing |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |
+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
| 1985 tam | 5 | 72 138 52.2 935 6.8 3 8 | 40 233 1 |
| 1986 tam | 14 | 195 363 53.7 2282 6.3 8 13 | 74 425 5 |
| 1987 sfo | 8 | 37 69 53.6 570 8.3 10 0 | 26 190 1 |
We don't need another running back. No one is replacing DD simply adding to the arsonal. Hey even Batman had Robin. Pretty soon DD will stand for the Dynamic Duo.thunderkyss said:Not too bad........ I wonder what Joey Harrinton's, Tim Couche's, & Trent Dilfer's numbers look like.
If this prooves we don't need another QB, can I do the same thing with DD to prove we don't need another RB??
TEXANRED said:We don't need another running back. No one is replacing DD simply adding to the arsonal. Hey even Batman had Robin. Pretty soon DD will stand for the Dynamic Duo.
Of course we will. AJ is our Batmobile, Kubiak is our Alfred and we have the hottest cheerleaders in the country so take your pick on who you would like to be batgirl.Bobo said:And they won't have a Batmobile, nor Batgirl, nor Alfred to go with it.
TEXANRED said:Of course we will. AJ is our Batmobile, Kubiak is our Alfred and we have the hottest cheerleaders in the country so take your pick on who you would like to be batgirl.
TEXANRED said:Of course we will. AJ is our Batmobile, Kubiak is our Alfred and we have the hottest cheerleaders in the country so take your pick on who you would like to be batgirl.
mother-in-law said:Josh Lovelady played ball for the U of H in the 1998 - 2000 time frame and then went on to play for Scottish Claymores (winning all Europe NFL recognition) and then went to Detroit Lions.
This young man has a love of the sport and, with the right coaching and guidance, will make a great NFL offensive lineman.
How do you tell the TEXANS that he is out there?/
tsip said:This post from '05 started off by comparing Carr's first 3 years in the NFL to some other well known QB's and ended up with posts in '06 still talking about just the first 3 yrs, like year 4 was a mirage. Too, IMO there are a lot of disollutionist out there that think all Carr's problems are the result of bad circumstances around him and these will 'go away' when the circumstances do!! HELL-O. Bill Belichick has talked several times about all the 'obstacles' a team faces each year--injuries,poor play,turnovers,etc.--and makes the point that while each team faces these 'obstacles,' how they deal with them is the key. The Pats do not allow excuses under any circumstance. The Texans? We may not lead the NFL in many positive team categories but-if we are not first in making excuses--like Bum said, "it don't take long to call the roll."
Texans86 said:Tom Brady had a little help from his offensive line. He also had a defense that wouldn't lose leads in the fourth quarter. If our defense had held up this season, this would be a different story for Carr. They let J.P. Losman score on them, and if I remember correctly, he didn't score again for like 2 or 3 weeks. He was bad, and we made him look good. Point of View makes a difference.
DominickDavisFan76 said:I hate bringing this up but.......He made Fitzpatrick look like a pro bowl QB who led his team when they were down by 21.