Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
RSP Film Room No.51: QB Christian Hackenberg
But according to many on this board, the QB is supposed to do it ALL!Feel so damn bad for Hack. Sacked 10 times on 35 drop backs. This was pretty much every play...
![]()
Temple was rushing 3 and dropping 8 all night and Hack was still running for his life with every WR doubled. He has no chance in that offense.
But according to many on this board, the QB is supposed to do it ALL!
Franklin is ruining Hack. Temple rushes 2 vs. 6 OL and gets the sack.
I'll never again question QBs changing schools when coaches change.
Ian Rapoport @RapSheet 14h14 hours ago
This is all going to make Christian Hackenberg a really interesting draft topic RT @AlbertBreer: Bill O'Brien > James Franklin
Why did Penn State's Christian Hackenberg play in final series against Temple? James Franklin explains
It was hard to believe that Christian Hackenberg, Penn State's talented junior quarterback who had already been sacked eight times and hit more, was taking the field for the Lions' final series with 1:16 left in a three possession game here Saturday. But there he was.
The Lions' passer went down two more times on that drive, marking the ninth and 10th time he was sacked, seemingly for no good reason with the Lions down three scores.
Head coach James Franklin did think it made sense for him to be on the field, though.
The first reason:
"I think it's a message," Franklin said. "It's no different than calling timeouts at the end of the game when the game is sometimes decided. You keep playing."
And the second?
"We didn't think he was going to be sacked again with the plays we were calling," he continued. "It happened."
Indeed it did, proof that Penn State's offense, which was seemingly ahead of where it was at this time a year ago, really isn't. Sure, the unit put together a couple good drives led by good blocking, and even when things weren't going well, there were small clues it was heading in the right direction.
It can't be forgotten, though, that the Lions surrendered 44 sacks a year ago. Saturday, they made it nearly a quarter of the way back to that total.
And it wasn't all on the offensive line. The fact of the matter is that Penn State has a blocking issue across the program, which hasn't and isn't going to be fixed overnight. To say it's only the offensive line's problem would be akin to blaming Hackenberg for each and every interception he throws. The running backs, receivers, and tight ends all must join the offensive line in improving their blocking, which will help Penn State's offense click like it did early, when the Lions averaged a play every 19 seconds and scored in the first nine minutes. Hackenberg can help his own cause, too, but getting out of the pocket or getting rid of the ball sooner.
Regarding O'Brien > Franklin, many are blaming all of Hackenberg's problem on the casts of players surrounding him. If that is truly the case then at this this stage wouldn't that onus be on O'Brien and not Franklin? From my perspective, some sacks were created by Hack holding the ball to long. The other problem I noted is when he did have time to throw he wasn't all that accurate.
Which is why he may fall to the 8-10 range. If that happens hopefully the Texans trade up from what I believe will be the 15-20 range and BOB can get Hack back to where he was. (Hopefully even better.) To me after the beating Hack has taken he looks gun shy.
Although some of what has happened at Penlal St. falls on BOB. Most of this falls on Franklin. I mean did Donovan Smith get picked with the 33rd pick last yr? I believe there was another OL from that group drafted also. BOB left that program in better shape than when he got there and Franklin is in over his head. Kinda like Strong is at UT.
Thanks for leaving out the probation scholarship restrictions and postseason ban that O'Brien walked into.Penn St players drafted this year were at Penn St before BOB. BOB Penn St players are now Soph and Juniors, the strength of the team. Penn St was loaded when BOB took over and only handful of players left, so did he really leave the Penal Colony in better shape? Maybe BOB poor recruitment record at Penn St is as bad as his draft record in Houston??? Lots of Penn St. fans and alumni were glad to see BOB go.
The NCAA uses a different QB rating formula than the NFL. That 109.4 looks good until you realize it ranked 113th in the nation (behind UT's Tyrone Swoopes).Hack, despite his poor press......, he racked up a 134 QB rating in 2013.....and still a 109.4 rating in 2014.
I honestly can't see how anyone would think Hackenberg is a better prospect than Tom Savage. Even with his poor performance, steelB is talking about trading up to 8 to get him.
That's insane.
Exactly what skills would that include?He has the skill level to become what Texans fans have been searching for since their inception.
Exactly what skills would that include?
The NCAA uses a different QB rating formula than the NFL. That 109.4 looks good until you realize it ranked 113th in the nation (behind UT's Tyrone Swoopes).
I don't know if anyone in the NFL has ever considered him as a 1-1 pick, or a 1st rounder for that matter. But Hackenberg is not accurate, has no mobility, and no feel for pressure. He was one of the worst starting QBs in college football in 2014. And Hackenberg actually looks worse in 2015.In short there's a reason Hack was considered a likely 1-1 pick after his freshman season. Hack is a bad fit for Franklin's offense.
I don't know if anyone in the NFL has ever considered him as a 1-1 pick, or a 1st rounder for that matter. But Hackenberg is not accurate, has no mobility, and no feel for pressure. He was one of the worst starting QBs in college football in 2014. And Hackenberg actually looks worse in 2015.
Well, Hackenberg is under Franklin. For now. My guess is that any more performances like yesterday will put Hackenberg and his 1-1 potential on the bench.Under Franklin...
Sounds like a third round project...We have a difference in opinion on what Hack can becoe with better coaching. He looked like a franchise QB under BOB and a pedestrian QB under Franklin. I'm better he will go back to the former under BOB. He has the skill level to become what Texans fans have been searching for since their inception.
Well, Hackenberg is under Franklin. For now. My guess is that any more performances like yesterday will put Hackenberg and his 1-1 potential on the bench.
I remember Brett Hundley getting a lot of criticism here for taking sacks. And that's understandable. But Hackenberg gets a pass, because it's his coach's fault or the line's fault. I just see a lot of inconsistency here in QB evaluations.
Regarding O'Brien > Franklin, many are blaming all of Hackenberg's problem on the casts of players surrounding him. If that is truly the case then at this this stage wouldn't that onus be on O'Brien and not Franklin? From my perspective, some sacks were created by Hack holding the ball to long. The other problem I noted is when he did have time to throw he wasn't all that accurate and he lacks consistency.
Sanctions have finally caught up to PSU. Literally is going to ruin Hackenberg. While Temples program is on the rise, there not that good. Cmon 2 pass rushers beat 6 OL!!
O'Brian will value him higher than any other organization, regardless post Bill Penn era. So if he falls to 2nd wouldn't surprise me he puts his job on the line.
O'Brian will value him higher than any other organization, regardless post Bill Penn era. So if he falls to 2nd wouldn't surprise me he puts his job on the line.
After seeing what we got from the $5MM they paid Hoyer, I don't doubt it.
$4.75m guaranteed over two years. Low rent that could be less than 2% on the cap per year
$4.75m guaranteed over two years. Low rent that could be less than 2% on the cap per year
To all my draftniks out there, assuming PSU continues its downward spiral all year, IYOS, how much does this hurt Hackenbergs stock
Well, Hackenberg is under Franklin. For now. My guess is that any more performances like yesterday will put Hackenberg and his 1-1 potential on the bench.
I remember Brett Hundley getting a lot of criticism here for taking sacks. And that's understandable. But Hackenberg gets a pass, because it's his coach's fault or the line's fault. I just see a lot of inconsistency here in QB evaluations.
The inconsistency in evaluating qbs is pretty consistent around here. If you like the guy its the players around him and/or the coaches fault as to why his play sucks. If you dont like him, he's at fault for everything regardless of the circumstances...Its been that way since david carr dont u know that?
To all my draftniks out there, assuming PSU continues its downward spiral all year, IYOS, how much does this hurt Hackenbergs stock
If Hackenberg keeps on his current course then I wouldn't even consider him in the first 3 rounds. He has top 10 tools but he looks broken right now and I'm not wasting a rounds 1-3 pick on a guy that I have to rebuild brick by brick.
Except Hack looked really good in BOB's system. (A perfect fit?)
If Hackenberg keeps on his current course then I wouldn't even consider him in the first 3 rounds. He has top 10 tools but he looks broken right now and I'm not wasting a rounds 1-3 pick on a guy that I have to rebuild brick by brick.
Bottom line is we need a franchise QB. And if this guy has the tools to be that then we need to pull the trigger. The NFL is a league of have and have nots. And unless Mallett proves that he is the guy then we will continue being in the have nots for the 13 consecutive year.
Pulling the trigger on Hackenberg does not keep us from being a "have not"
I have no problem pulling the trigger on Hackenberg, but going the way he & his team is going, I'm thinking we should pull that trigger in the 5th round or later.
Taking him in the 1st doesn't make him a better prospect. The better prospects will be taken in the first round.
Again, does anyone really think draft stock makes the prospect? Of course not. You keep stating things like they are my thoughts.
Well, Hackenberg is under Franklin. For now. My guess is that any more performances like yesterday will put Hackenberg and his 1-1 potential on the bench.
I remember Brett Hundley getting a lot of criticism here for taking sacks. And that's understandable. But Hackenberg gets a pass, because it's his coach's fault or the line's fault. I just see a lot of inconsistency here in QB evaluations.
Nobody felt bad for Hundley. I think that's where the difference lies for some. And they can't separate that from the evaluation. He played for a wonderful coaching staff that maximized his abilities. His flaws were his flaws and were recognized as such. He was made better by the coaching he received in college. Hackenberg has been made worse.
People want to like Hackenberg because under OB he showed a glimpse of the physical talent he possesses. And then Franklin came along. He wants to run a system that Hackenberg doesn't fit into. So he either needs to change QBs or change the system. But he won't do either. I think people genuinely feel sorry for Hackenberg because of his situation. His coaches aren't putting him in a position to succeed. And because people feel bad for him they let it affect how they judge him.
Hackenberg is no longer that player that he showed evidence of during his freshman year. I made excuses for him all last year, but I've seen enough. He's been ruined. A lot of it is his own fault. He has glaring flaws that have developed to the point that I don't think they can ever be fixed.
Franklin and his staff deserve a lot of the blame. The offense up there is a wreck and they've made no effort to change up anything at all to try to create some improvement. They just keep trotting the same kids out there every week to get destroyed. Not one player on their offense has improved from last year to this year. That's a huge red flag for the coaching staff.
The reason some people are giving Hackenberg a free pass is because it is a legitimate question as to whether or not the flaws he shows are actually his flaws or flaws in others that just happen to make him look bad.
Personally, I think Hackenberg did once have the potential to be a great NFL QB. But whatever potential he had was wasted and destroyed by the current regime at Penn St. He is now a shell shocked check-down machine with zero confidence. For a QB, each snap is a chance to be the man and make a play for your team. But for him, each snap is just trying to survive against the chance that he might get destroyed again. And once that mindset creeps in it is impossible to overcome.
Nobody felt bad for Hundley. I think that's where the difference lies for some. And they can't separate that from the evaluation. He played for a wonderful coaching staff that maximized his abilities. His flaws were his flaws and were recognized as such. He was made better by the coaching he received in college. Hackenberg has been made worse.
People want to like Hackenberg because under OB he showed a glimpse of the physical talent he possesses. And then Franklin came along. He wants to run a system that Hackenberg doesn't fit into. So he either needs to change QBs or change the system. But he won't do either. I think people genuinely feel sorry for Hackenberg because of his situation. His coaches aren't putting him in a position to succeed. And because people feel bad for him they let it affect how they judge him.
Hackenberg is no longer that player that he showed evidence of during his freshman year. I made excuses for him all last year, but I've seen enough. He's been ruined. A lot of it is his own fault. He has glaring flaws that have developed to the point that I don't think they can ever be fixed.
Franklin and his staff deserve a lot of the blame. The offense up there is a wreck and they've made no effort to change up anything at all to try to create some improvement. They just keep trotting the same kids out there every week to get destroyed. Not one player on their offense has improved from last year to this year. That's a huge red flag for the coaching staff.
The reason some people are giving Hackenberg a free pass is because it is a legitimate question as to whether or not the flaws he shows are actually his flaws or flaws in others that just happen to make him look bad.
Personally, I think Hackenberg did once have the potential to be a great NFL QB. But whatever potential he had was wasted and destroyed by the current regime at Penn St. He is now a shell shocked check-down machine with zero confidence. For a QB, each snap is a chance to be the man and make a play for your team. But for him, each snap is just trying to survive against the chance that he might get destroyed again. And once that mindset creeps in it is impossible to overcome.
Great post
I hope you're wrong about Hack and that he can realize his full potential. Looking bach it would've been better for Hack to transfer after BOB left. This is the reason I' for allowing kids to transfer without losing a yr after a coaching change. I know people say a recruit commits to a university not a HC or team. But that's hogwash. IMHO
Great post
I hope you're wrong about Hack and that he can realize his full potential. Looking bach it would've been better for Hack to transfer after BOB left. This is the reason I' for allowing kids to transfer without losing a yr after a coaching change. I know people say a recruit commits to a university not a HC or team. But that's hogwash. IMHO
I think it should be looked at on a case by case basis. We don't need to be punishing these kids & stopping them from being all they can be. At the same time, we don't need to allow them to run from their problems. & I mean serious problems; grades, legal, general trouble, that kind of thing.