Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Cass on CH.13

TexasJedi

Veteran
He was pretty passionate in defending Mario. He looked right into the camera, pointed to himself and said "Blame this guy right here", and something to the effect that I'll go to my grave defending this pick.

Perhaps the more interesting thing was his discussion of Bush. He talked about him not being on the field for much of the Rose Bowl, insinuating he is a part-time player. Perhaps there was more to the decision to take Mario than signability.
 
Well, which is it Casserly, does the coaching staff make the decisions or do you? You blamed the previous coaching staff for formulating the team and now you want all limelight on this 1st rounder? I can't ever tell the true story when this guy talks. He so arrogant it's disgusting and weighs very thin win the fans.
 
TexasJedi said:
Perhaps there was more to the decision to take Mario than signability.

CC himself said that they were both signable. They took a football decision and decided on Mario. It wasn't about the money. It was about the team.
 
kiwitexansfan said:
CC himself said that they were both signable. They took a football decision and decided on Mario. It wasn't about the money. It was about the team.
Well what I meant was that they may not have been as high on Bush as we were lead to believe.
 
Bob Allen just asked CC if he was going to be back this year. CC said he doesn't know. He'll be having a meeting with Bob McNair soon. Also said reports about him taking a league office job are wrong.
 
kiwitexansfan said:
CC himself said that they were both signable. They took a football decision and decided on Mario. It wasn't about the money. It was about the team.

Yeah and NFL front offices have never put a spin on their explanations to avoid critiscim before.:rolleyes:
 
TexasJedi said:
He was pretty passionate in defending Mario. He looked right into the camera, pointed to himself and said "Blame this guy right here", and something to the effect that I'll go to my grave defending this pick.

Perhaps the more interesting thing was his discussion of Bush. He talked about him not being on the field for much of the Rose Bowl, insinuating he is a part-time player. Perhaps there was more to the decision to take Mario than signability.


Casserly has said that he had graded Julius Peppers and graded Mario Williams, and Mario graded out higher. If the draft staff really believed that, well then, they did the right football thing. The right thing, even though Williams didn't play in the spotline like the glamour picks.

I think the thing that CC is really doing now is urging the fans to support Mario and not to blame the player for being picked. A lot of people might want to vent their frustration on the player, but the player can't help where he is picked.

And I agree with him on this point. Go Mario! :redtowel:
 
Most interesting thing he said, other than his very passionate plea to not blame Mario, was his description of Bush.

(Paraphrasing here)

Casserly said:

"Reggie Bush was a part time player in college.

Look back at the Rose Bowl, a game alot of people here in Houston remember clearly obviously. Reggie Bush wasn't on the field for half the game. You have to ask yourself, why wasn't he? You need to take that question and analyize it further.

When Earl Campbell played here in Houston he played the entire game. He wasn't a part time player. It's hard to justify paying a guy 9 million dollars a year to play 15 snaps a game.

When you have a great running back and a great defensive end, you take the defensive end. I make that pick 10 times out of 10 and I'll defend that pick for the rest of my career.

Reggie Bush is a great running back. We'll see how he does in New Orleans. We bet on our guy, and in the end I know we made the right choice."


And maybe I'm trying to read way too much into this, but I was struck at the tone of his voice throughout, but especially when he said "We'll see how he does in New Orleans" like he somehow knows he's not going to turn out the way people think he is.

I almost get the impression that people on the inside of the organization were fighting for Williams the entire time, and something happened thursday night to finally convince McNair not to pick Bush. What exactly that was, we may never know.
 
I'll say this, I like the fire our FO is showing in this whole ordeal. Nothing skittish at all, I like that.
 
TexasJedi said:
Perhaps the more interesting thing was his discussion of Bush. He talked about him not being on the field for much of the Rose Bowl, insinuating he is a part-time player. Perhaps there was more to the decision to take Mario than signability.

He picked the Rose Bowl as an example because that was a game most people could relate to. He said you don't pay a guy $9mill a year to be used part-time...Mario will give you every down. This is the 1st time he has used negative reasoning for not taking Bush. I thought the reasoning was nothing more than addressing the defensive side of the ball. Now Cass. seems to be going into his own defensive mode after getting a whiff of the vibe in Houston.

In essence it was a finacial decision because they want to pay big $ for an every down guy. If they believe Bu$h was used soley as a part-time player in college then maybe they have convinced themselves that he may become injury prone in the NFL...
 
I actually agree w/ Casserly here. Mario seems like a humble person. Hopefully the humble DE runs roughshod over the opposing teams and Vince. YEAH I SAID IT. WHAT???!!!!! Still got love for you VY, but you took it there in wanting to beat up on the Texans. It's all good.
 
BradK10 said:
I'll say this, I like the fire our FO is showing in this whole ordeal. Nothing skittish at all, I like that.

Unfortunatley they have to be this way. If they don't act like this they will get steamrolled and they know it. If they show any fear or dissension in the ranks they will get eaten alive.
 
GhostRaider2006 said:
Unfortunatley they have to be this way. If they don't act like this they will get steamrolled and they know it. If they show any fear or dissension in the ranks they will get eaten alive.

Well I've seen in the past other FO's that haven't been so gung ho in these matters.
 
GhostRaider2006 said:
Unfortunatley they have to be this way. If they don't act like this they will get steamrolled and they know it. If they show any fear or dissension in the ranks they will get eaten alive.

After watching Casserly tonight, there were no reservations in his voice about this pick. I have no doubt that he thinks they did the right thing.

Even though he HAD to know this was coming, he seems pretty ticked off at the backlash from fans.
 
swisher said:
I almost get the impression that people on the inside of the organization were fighting for Williams the entire time, and something happened thursday night to finally convince McNair not to pick Bush. What exactly that was, we may never know.


I think they mostly made the decision after Bush visited Houston. I don't think that visit went well. Check out this account:

Link: Yahoo Sports

The mixed signals came even before Bush arrived at a news conference that concluded his visit in Houston. Team officials hesitated before letting him stand in front of the backdrop covered in team logos for the event.

The Texans are keeping quiet about the top draft pick. Coach Gary Kubiak didn't answer questions about Bush during a separate news conference earlier on the 2006 schedule

Then the very next day, they get Mario Williams to Houston.

The Texans couldn't say the visit with Bush went unwell that because they didn't want to derail any trade up suitors but I never got the feeling that Bush was in love with the Texans and vice versa, the way it should have been since Bush was in the media's eyes "the consensus #1 pick" and we had the first pick and wheelbarrows full of money.

If you know you are the first pick and you really want to go to that city, you sell yourself like crazy to the locals. Bush never did that.

Here's an example and some inadvertant humor given his parent's house situation:

Reggie Chat Link

Texans_Chick: I know you know about the no state income tax in Texas, but did you know that the median house price for Houston is $137,000 (compared to $578,000 in San Diego). Extra good reason to come to Houston, isn't it. And you can drive a nice car here without worrying about getting salt and ice and snow on it. Just sayin.
Reggie:Thanks.

He says "Thanks." Not "Yeah, I've heard great things about Houston and blah blah blah. Perfect opportunity to say something nice about the city. If you look to the rest of the chat, he says nicer stuff about his favorite cartoon character and the potential of having a career modeling.

Just thinking out loud.
 
Casserly said in one interview he called Wednesday morning and Wednesday afternoon and then Thursday morning asking about Bush's problems with the house. They broke off negoiations Thursday afternoon. That's a lot of telephone calls for someone who is not worried.

I think they smelled something was wrong and I believe they are correct. So when you have a close decision and a lot of money invested you are worried about risk. It became very simple, because it looked like the risk was rising rapidly if they took Bush. I think the background of what started to appear scared McNair. I don't think they liked the gang affiliations part of the story. There is more to this story than meets the eye.

I think they began to see that Bush was about Bush, not the team. Everyone that has appeared before the camera has talked about the Team and that has been a major emphasis of Kubiaks. Therefore no one should be surprised and I think the next few weeks are going to explode in the wrong way for Bush. We did not need that nor did McNair and company want that.

There's all kinds of spin to try to not hurt Bush any more than he has been. But I really think the above is the reality of the situation.
 
There really does seem to be more to this than meets the eye. I don't know, thinking out loud here too. Maybe it's me trying to rationlize the pick.

But ever since friday night when Williams was announced as the pick, something felt wrong about the whole thing. Not just the pick, but how quickly things turned.

If they had wanted Williams all along, then what was the point of even talking with Reggie's people? To drive the price down on Williams? Or was it because up until Thursday afternoon he was their guy?

I'm telling you, something spooked them.
 
swisher said:
After watching Casserly tonight, there were no reservations in his voice about this pick. I have no doubt that he thinks they did the right thing.

Even though he HAD to know this was coming, he seems pretty ticked off at the backlash from fans.

I agree he had to know this was coming. I just don't think they expectd reaction to be as massive and vocal and sustained as it has been but then again they haven't really been on the absolute wrong side of the fans yet. This is a first for the team. It was always as split audience when it came to criticsim of the team. Now for the first time it is coming from a united front and its full force and very loud.
 
swisher said:
If they had wanted Williams all along, then what was the point of even talking with Reggie's people? To drive the price down on Williams? Or was it because up until Thursday afternoon he was their guy?

I'm telling you, something spooked them.

You can't say that you don't want Reggie and you have to visit him or else you destroy trade down possibilities that allow you to get more picks and still get your guy. (Something that CC values). After the Carr bonus, nobody really believed we'd take QB, but nobody thought we'd pass up on Bush.

But it seemed like the whole Mario stuff really didn't take off until after Reggie visited here. And you got the sense after that point that the Texans didn't care if their negotiation style pissed Bush's people off--stylistically a bit outta character with the friendlish way the Texans tend to do stuff. (Something that worried me at the time for signability issues and happiness of the player post signing).

Obviously, nobody wanted the salary responsibility of the #1 spot. And there were plenty of great players at the top of the draft. So no trade was gonna work--especially after NO got Brees and didn't have pressure to take QB.
 
Charley inferred that Bush was not a very good person. Watch it again and he slips that in there. I think our Management was really turned off by his attitude and his representatives attitude.
 
Vinny said:
Charley inferred that Bush was not a very good person. Watch it again and he slips that in there. I think our Management was really turned off by his attitude and his representatives attitude.
I doubt anyone in this draft that did not play TE for Maryland is more cocky--err--confident than Reggie Bush. No one had as much draft talk as him before January 4th.
 
mexican_texan said:
I doubt anyone in this draft that did not play TE for Maryland is more cocky--err--confident than Reggie Bush. No one had as much draft talk as him before January 4th.
Not impressed. I don't put people on pedestals myself. He is no better than you or I. No reason to be a jerk...ever...unless you are a jerk of course.
 
Vinny said:
Charley inferred that Bush was not a very good person. Watch it again and he slips that in there. I think our Management was really turned off by his attitude and his representatives attitude.


I agree 1000% about how they were turned off. I was turned off before he got here and his demands he was already laying out for the #1 pick he "thought he was guaranteed" to get. I was laughing the night they got the deal done with Mario.

NO is going to have to match that offer or better if they even think Reggie is going to step on that field. Especially with the $3.2 Million law suite about to be slapped on him from the marketing company that took care of his family while a USC.

I would not want to be in NO spot right now, nor Duece's spot because Reggie is going to sell tickets for that team and he knows it and so does the Saints. Now he will put the pressure on them and they are going to have to get him in there right now if they want to sell those seats.
 
swisher said:
There really does seem to be more to this than meets the eye. I don't know, thinking out loud here too. Maybe it's me trying to rationlize the pick.

But ever since friday night when Williams was announced as the pick, something felt wrong about the whole thing. Not just the pick, but how quickly things turned.

If they had wanted Williams all along, then what was the point of even talking with Reggie's people? To drive the price down on Williams? Or was it because up until Thursday afternoon he was their guy?

I'm telling you, something spooked them.

Two things strike me. First, I think Casserly and Kubiak had a difficult time convincing McNair to sign off on Mario. Second, I think they wanted to move down to 2, 3 or 4 and were attempting to keep Bush out there in order to receive offers for him. I do believe that Mario was the guy they wanted the whole time.

According to reports, N.O. didn't receive many offers for Bush either. Mort said that the Jets only offered #4 and then nothing until the third round. They wouldn't include #29 or #35 in the mix. I think that further hints at the fact that Bush isn't thought of nearly as highly as the media asserts, especially if you believe Casserly that the Texans never received any offers for their pick.
 
Vinny said:
Charley inferred that Bush was not a very good person. Watch it again and he slips that in there. I think our Management was really turned off by his attitude and his representatives attitude.


That's right!! I meant to mention that.

In the middle of Casserly's lecture to the fans, he slips and says "Mario is a better human being..." and then pauses as if catching himself before saying something else. But he did say it, he says he was a better human being. What do they know that we don't?

Plus...go back two days before friday. Mario Williams is quoted as saying he really didn't feel like Houston wanted him, but New Orleans did. He said he was looking forward to playing where he was wanted. That has stuck with me, because at first I took it as a sure sign we were going with Bush. I wish I could find where I saw him say that...
 
Vinny said:
Charley inferred that Bush was not a very good person. Watch it again and he slips that in there. I think our Management was really turned off by his attitude and his representatives attitude.

Crud. I didn't watch the show.

What did he sneak in there? Did he do it by praising Mario and by inference dogging Bush?

Edit: Thanks!!!!
In the middle of Casserly's lecture to the fans, he slips and says "Mario is a better human being..." and then pauses as if catching himself before saying something else. But he did say it, he says he was a better human being. What do they know that we don't?

Wow, that is a little strong to sneak out. Interesting.
 
Ibar_Harry said:
Casserly said in one interview he called Wednesday morning and Wednesday afternoon and then Thursday morning asking about Bush's problems with the house. They broke off negoiations Thursday afternoon. That's a lot of telephone calls for someone who is not worried.

I think they smelled something was wrong and I believe they are correct. So when you have a close decision and a lot of money invested you are worried about risk. It became very simple, because it looked like the risk was rising rapidly if they took Bush. I think the background of what started to appear scared McNair. I don't think they liked the gang affiliations part of the story. There is more to this story than meets the eye.

I think they began to see that Bush was about Bush, not the team. Everyone that has appeared before the camera has talked about the Team and that has been a major emphasis of Kubiaks. Therefore no one should be surprised and I think the next few weeks are going to explode in the wrong way for Bush. We did not need that nor did McNair and company want that.

There's all kinds of spin to try to not hurt Bush any more than he has been. But I really think the above is the reality of the situation.

When they choose someone like this, because of the investment, they immediately take out an insurance policy. But the insurance policy is not going to cover the kinds of problems Bush has.

Williams could fall over dead tomorrow - horrible example - but he would be covered if it was natural causes. Bush may not be able to perform for reasons that would not be covered by an insurance policy. Basically he is uninsurable right now.

Its like no draftee can begin practice until the contracts are signed. That's why we are lucky to have Mario's contract signed and he's ready to start work. Its a very smart move for both sides.
 
Okay, here's the Mario Williams quote from Friday, just hours before agreeing to terms with the Texans:

Williams said Friday he wasn't sure whether the Texans' flirtation with him was genuine.

"I'd be happy to be taken first, naturally," he said. "It would be a great honor. I know I could help them if they thought enough to draft me in that spot.

"I'm not quite sure how interested they are. Maybe they're using me as leverage. I don't know. It's not frustrating to me. I'm not worried about it."

Williams told reporters Thursday he thought New Orleans might have become his professional destination.

"I think the Texans are interested in me, but I think New Orleans is more interested," he said. "Sure, I'd be happy to be taken first, but I just want to play for a team that wants to utilize my talents."


So, up to that point (between thursday afternoon and friday afternoon) Williams (at least publicly) sounds like he thought Houston was not going to take him.

The logical explanation is the Texans told him not to say anything until a deal was done....but....I don't think he would have used those words. I doubt he would have even mentioned the Saints if all he was doing was trying to not say anything.

So assume Williams up until Friday afternoon had doubts the Texans were interested....were the Texans really that clueless about who they were going to pick? Or did something happen that made the decision for them?

Listen to Mario Williams talk friday night. It's like a guy who just found out he won the lottery. It had not sunk in yet.
 
SESupergenius said:
Well, which is it Casserly, does the coaching staff make the decisions or do you? You blamed the previous coaching staff for formulating the team and now you want all limelight on this 1st rounder? I can't ever tell the true story when this guy talks. He so arrogant it's disgusting and weighs very thin win the fans.

What "wears very thin" is the unwarranted criticism many folks are leveling at the team for the Mario Williams pick. As many on this board know, I am the first to fire criticism at the Texans and their staff. I have said very little good about them in the past several months. I'd be the first one to lead the badmouthing if it was deserving at all. However, in this case, there is nothing to blast, nothing to criticize, nothing to badmouth -- and I honestly don't understand the lambasting. This was the smartest, wisest thing for the staff to do and, quite honestly, it was a no-brainer -- something anybody who knows the ins and outs of football would understand. The fact that there is so much adverse reaction to what obviously is a very rational football decision makes me question the level of football intelligence within some parts of the Texans fan community.
 
Bobo said:
This was the smartest, wisest thing for the staff to do and, quite honestly, it was a no-brainer -- something anybody who knows the ins and outs of football would understand.

But you see this is just your opinion nothing more and nothing less. And unfortunatley you are in the minority with your opinion.
 
GhostRaider2006 said:
Now for the first time it is coming from a united front and its full force and very loud.

You are dreaming. When they announced the pick, there were more people cheering it than booing. The criticism is hardly coming "from a united front." The only folks saying that is the media -- the same media that was hyping Bush from the start. There are many, many fans who are fully supportive of this choice as seen from the reaction to the pick. In fact, I would say more people back it than oppose it.
 
GhostRaider2006 said:
But you see this is just your opinion nothing more and nothing less. And unfortunatley you are in the minority with your opinion.

Wrong. I believe I am in the majority. Just listen to the announcement of the pick and you will hear more cheers than boos. But it's irrelevant anyway as far as how many falls on which side. This isn't a democracy when it comes to making this kind of choice. It's which is the smartest and wisest thing to do. I've heard all the arguments for Bush and, quite honestly, NONE of them makes any sense at all. The Texans did the wisest, smartest thing to do. It's NO who is going to regret the move when they have three good RBs, only one ball, and have problems everywhere else on the field. Some day, they are going to have to get rid of Deuce and maybe Bennett as well -- and they will have to get rid of them for pennies on the dollar as was the case with Travis Henry when the Bills drafted McGahee. It was NO who made the bad, bad decision -- not to mention the possibility of the scandal building and the potential problems in signing him. The Texans are going to come out on top here, no doubts about it.
 
Bobo said:
You are dreaming. When they announced the pick, there were more people cheering it than booing.

Uhh sorry to call you out on this but I was there and that is not true. There was a very small contigent there at the draft party that tried to cheer but were quickly drowned out by all of the booing and the chanting of Reggie. Their cheering lasted all of ten seconds and the booing lasted quite a while.

Bobo said:
The criticism is hardly coming "from a united front." The only folks saying that is the media -- the same media that was hyping Bush from the start.
Oh give me a break with your conspiracy theories. The only positive things I have heard have been coming from a small group of posters on the boards trying to defend the pick. I haven't heard anything positive from anywhere else.

Bobo said:
There are many, many fans who are fully supportive of this choice as seen from the reaction to the pick. In fact, I would say more people back it than oppose it.

Well here is your chance. PROVE IT.
 
Hey way to give a guy THREE WHOLE MINUTES :)

If you watched ESPN coverage today, you'd see that folks are starting to realize that yeah...maybe Bush would have been good too, but that Mario isn't the distastrous pick people like you are making it out to be
 
MojoX said:
While he is at it, why don't you prove your case?

I have no problem doing that at all. First turn on your tv and watch the local news. I have only seen two or three positive reactions in interviews from fans there. You know what the rest were. Let's shift over to the radio Sports Radio 610 am, KTRH 740 am, The ESPN Sports Animal 950am listen to these channels tommorow they all broadcast live on the air. I haven't heard one positive fan reaction there yet. Now onto the web and boards. The fact that Williams supporters are tired of responding to all the anit-williams threads only a day after the draft show the fact that they are seriously overwhelmed. It's a new person attacking this pick every 15 minutes with the same 5- 15 group of Williams supporters attacking their views when they get a chance. Hell why don't you jump over to ESPN and check out their poll of how we graded out that is quite revealing as well.

Your turn now.
 
BradK10 said:
Hey way to give a guy THREE WHOLE MINUTES :)

If you watched ESPN coverage today, you'd see that folks are starting to realize that yeah...maybe Bush would have been good too, but that Mario isn't the distastrous pick people like you are making it out to be

I am not talking about broadcasters I am talking about the fans. Show me a majority of the fanbase that is in favor of this decsion and I will apologize and change my tune.
 
GhostRaider2006 said:
I have no problem doing that at all. First turn on your tv. I have only seen two or three positive reactions in interviews from fans there. You know what the rest were. Let's shift over to the radio Sports Radio 610 am, KTRH 740 am, The ESPN Sports Animal 950am listen to these channels tommorow they all broadcast live on the air. I haven't heard one positive fan reaction there yet. Now onto the web and boards. The fact that Williams supporters are tired of responding to all the anit-williams threads only a day after the draft show the fact that they are seriously overwhelmed. It's a new person attacking this pick every 15 minutes with the same 5- 15 group of Williams supporters attacking their views when they get a chance. Hell why don't you jump over to ESPN and check out their poll of how we graded out that is quite revealing as well.

Your turn now.

I'm actually not sick of defending the pick to mindless folk like yourself. I'm not gonna say it was the pick the majority wanted, but it was the smartest.

The football intelligent members of this board won't run anywhere, they'll be here till the end hopeless trying to explain to those who just want to see the Texans logo on more highlights that this was the correct pick for the team.
 
GhostRaider2006 said:
I am not talking about broadcasters I am talking about the fans. Show me a majority of the fanbase that is in favor of this decsion and I will apologize and change my tune.

There is no the majority of the fanbase that is happy with the pick...but that doesn't make it the wrong pick.
 
Oh and if the majority of the fanbase always got their way (us throwing a ton of money at Carlos Beltran to keep him)....well, we see what happened there didn't we?

(for the record, I wanted us to do whatever to sign Carlos)
 
GhostRaider2006 said:
I am not talking about broadcasters I am talking about the fans. Show me a majority of the fanbase that is in favor of this decsion and I will apologize and change my tune.

If you would have watched channel 13 tonight when they showed the announcement of the pick on draft day, more people were cheering than booing. What more proof do you need?
 
BradK10 said:
There is no the majority of the fanbase that is happy with the pick...but that doesn't make it the wrong pick.

I believe from what I saw on draft day that a majority of the fan base is happy with the pick. If it isn't, then I wonder seriously about the football intelligence level of said fanbase.
 
GhostRaider2006 said:
Hell why don't you jump over to ESPN and check out their poll of how we graded out that is quite revealing as well.

Your turn now.



Mel Kiper gave our draft a B+, tied with 2 other teams for the highest grade. :ok:
 
Bobo said:
I believe from what I saw on draft day that a majority of the fan base is happy with the pick. If it isn't, then I wonder seriously about the football intelligence level of said fanbase.

I'll tell ya, I seriously question the football intelligence of the majority of our fanbase
 
BradK10 said:
I'm actually not sick of defending the pick to mindless folk like yourself. I'm not gonna say it was the pick the majority wanted, but it was the smartest.

The football intelligent members of this board won't run anywhere, they'll be here till the end hopeless trying to explain to those who just want to see the Texans logo on more highlights that this was the correct pick for the team.

How grown up of you. I am dumb because I simply don't agree with you? Get over yourself. You lose complete credibility everytime you post something like this and comes off very child like.

Oh and by the way I believe Beltran is having a pretty good season so far.
 
GhostRaider2006 said:
I have no problem doing that at all. First turn on your tv. I have only seen two or three positive reactions in interviews from fans there. You know what the rest were. Let's shift over to the radio Sports Radio 610 am, KTRH 740 am, The ESPN Sports Animal 950am listen to these channels tommorow they all broadcast live on the air. I haven't heard one positive fan reaction there yet. Now onto the web and boards. The fact that Williams supporters are tired of responding to all the anit-williams threads only a day after the draft show the fact that they are seriously overwhelmed. It's a new person attacking this pick every 15 minutes with the same 5- 15 group of Williams supporters attacking their views when they get a chance. Hell why don't you jump over to ESPN and check out their poll of how we graded out that is quite revealing as well.

Your turn now.
That ain't gonna cut it. That's just turning to the choir and asking them to sing. The media just wants to report what makes for a better story and disappointed fans like yourself only want to hear your own crowing. You have to PROVE it, too. And internet polls aren't proof. Here's a hint:

Proof:
1. The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.
2.a. The validation of a proposition by application of specified rules, as of induction or deduction, to assumptions, axioms, and sequentially derived conclusions.
b. A statement or argument used in such a validation.

3. a. Convincing or persuasive demonstration: was asked for proof of his identity; an employment history that was proof of her dependability.
b. The state of being convinced or persuaded by consideration of evidence.

4. Determination of the quality of something by testing; trial: put one's beliefs to the proof.


My point is that unless you both can get the Gallup Poll running, you can't prove your point. And there is no point playing the internet fillibuster game to pretend you can. Just accept the reality and move on. You can repeat the same tired, unproveable statements over and over but it 1) won't make them true and 2) won't change what happened.

PS: I wanted Bush, that is until is gangstaliciousness came to light.
 
Back
Top