Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Give the man some props for stepping in and playing at a high level.
4 starts, 4 sacks. One away from the team lead. Brooks is putting together a pretty solid season since he was thrown into the fire. What more can you ask from a 2nd round rookie?
This is beginning to beg the question, the old chicken and egg story:
Is it the player or the coordinator?
Because supposedly we were DOOMED when Mario Williams got hurt andis out for the year................
I was saying back in the preseason that IF Wade Phillips is who we historically know him to be (a builder of good defenses) and IF he is given some goods to work with here, then Mario Williams or no Mario Williams we should see a good defense this year.
Let's also remember that we're talking about the Browns here. Let's see what happens against a good passing team like the Bengals. Anybody else watching this Bengals-Titans game right now? Dude, the Bengals are no joke. Dalton is making great decisions all game long. His accuracy is top notch. The passing plays are down-the-field and effective.
Jeff Triplett's bunch is reff'ing this game and they are calling a penalty on every other play. Isn't this bunch the most penalizing crew out there? It's incredible. Every other play there is holding or a personal foul or some such.
The question will be answered once we face elite QB's in the playoffs.
Well, I always knew he could do it but if he can really keep it up against top class O-lines. He's really going to give Mario something to think about in the offseason.
Brooks is growing into his role. Two sacks against any NFL team is a milestone.
i think he is what he is. a solid rookie OLB in an ideal system with great play around him and extremely little attention from opposing offenses. the same knocks applied to mario beating tightends (he's supposed to make the play) need to be applied to unblocked reed (he's supposed to make the play). i dont mean to diminish what he's done, because the results are there, but he's got plenty of work to do. i think he'll only get better, but i'm hesitant to heap on too much praise.
Fixed it for you.
Props for calling this. It's clear to me that Wade is a miracle worker.I was saying back in the preseason that IF Wade Phillips is who we historically know him to be (a builder of good defenses) and IF he is given some goods to work with here, then Mario Williams or no Mario Williams we should see a good defense this year.
I'm not going to over-praise the man, I'm just giving him props for being an impact player on a damn good defense. That's right, I said it, a damn good defense.
I agree with Scooter and others here that he needs work, but the tools/motor are there for a solid OLB in our system. Still a work in progress, but the man has a chance to break the all-time rookie sack record (5.5...pathetic but that's another bitching session) without starting 25% of the season.
Cush. Captain Meco. Connor. Reed. Not a bad LB group!
I know some people are going to want to turn this into another Brooks vs. Mario question but with the way hes playing right now I would love to see them on the field starting together.
I don't think we'll see Mario in a Texans uniform next year.
Props for calling this. It's clear to me that Wade is a miracle worker.
Yeah, well...it came at the cost of being labeled a Mario hater.
I'll tell you guys what I "hate." I hate anything that isn't what's best for the Texans. I have no favorite Texans players; in my eyes they ALL row the boat or they ALL stand dead in the water.
My only gripe about Mario is the situation with his upcoming new contract, and what that means for the TEAM as a whole. Because I'm in favor of spreading the love and making sure we are always able to field the best t-e-a-m we can, not getting caught up in hamstringing ourselves (pardon the expression) with superstar contracts that box us in.
Give the man some props for stepping in and playing at a high level.
4 starts, 4 sacks. One away from the team lead. Brooks is putting together a pretty solid season since he was thrown into the fire. What more can you ask from a 2nd round rookie?
I also find it funny that some people are even going as far to excuse some of his production to "being unblocked"...yet you didn't hear much when Mario was isolated against Dallas Clark. It's the same system..Wade does a great job at getting his defenders the most favorable match ups. He did it with Mario and now he's doing it with Brooks.
LMAO...the same posters who are trying to downplay Brooks are the same posters who go out of their way to praise whatever Mario Williams does, acted like he was the be all end all of this defense, and are the same posters who said we'd be screwed when he went out. Things are getting WAY too predictable around here.
Brooks Reed doesn't just have the skills/tools to be a solid OLBer in this defense...he has the skills to be a STAR in this defense. He's ALREADY above a "solid OLBer" in this system and he'll only continue to improve from here on out.
I also find it funny that some people are even going as far to excuse some of his production to "being unblocked"...yet you didn't hear much when Mario was isolated against Dallas Clark. It's the same system..Wade does a great job at getting his defenders the most favorable match ups. He did it with Mario and now he's doing it with Brooks.
Brooks Reed is a legit playmaker, how can you call a rook who's averaging a sack a start anything other than a legit playmaker? Face it, we hit gold in the second round, we haven't skipped a beat without Mario Williams (heck, we've actually improved in run defense), and Reed should've went MUCH higher in the draft. If he was able to start since day 1, we could be talking about a DROY candidate here.
LMAO...the same posters who are trying to downplay Brooks are the same posters who go out of their way to praise whatever Mario Williams does, acted like he was the be all end all of this defense, and are the same posters who said we'd be screwed when he went out. Things are getting WAY too predictable around here.
Brooks Reed doesn't just have the skills/tools to be a solid OLBer in this defense...he has the skills to be a STAR in this defense. He's ALREADY above a "solid OLBer" in this system and he'll only continue to improve from here on out.
I also find it funny that some people are even going as far to excuse some of his production to "being unblocked"...yet you didn't hear much when Mario was isolated against Dallas Clark. It's the same system..Wade does a great job at getting his defenders the most favorable match ups. He did it with Mario and now he's doing it with Brooks.
Brooks Reed is a legit playmaker, how can you call a rook who's averaging a sack a start anything other than a legit playmaker? Face it, we hit gold in the second round, we haven't skipped a beat without Mario Williams (heck, we've actually improved in run defense), and Reed should've went MUCH higher in the draft. If he was able to start since day 1, we could be talking about a DROY candidate here.
I also find it funny that some people are even going as far to excuse some of his production to "being unblocked"...yet you didn't hear much when Mario was isolated against Dallas Clark. It's the same system..Wade does a great job at getting his defenders the most favorable match ups. He did it with Mario and now he's doing it with Brooks.
Chill dude.. Amobi Okoye had four sacks in his first four starts.
step back and see the comparison. mario is degraded for beating a tightend (you're selectively ignoring how much was said). reed is degraded for going unblocked. reed isnt commanding a tightend motioning to his side. he doesnt have a back doubling protection. reed is a rookie going relatively unnoticed by the offense and doing his job when the opportunity provides itsself - very commendable. let's not make it out to say he's dominating the block and beating double teams. he's missed his share of lane assignments and is heavily reliant on others to free him up where as mario helps draw attention away from others while still producing all-pro results. to compare the two while watching the games is asinine. brooks has been great for a rookie, but as someone hoping mario would be traded, reed is miles away from being in mario's territory.
my record makes me safe from being lumped into "mario hater" or "mario fan".
If anything, I can see bringing Mario back & bumping Connor further down the depth chart.......... if Brooks keeps it up.
But if he's franchised isn't that then like 20M guaranteed ? That would be 1/6 or 1/7 of our entire cap wouldn't it ?i agreed with this before the trade deadline. we absolutely cant let that much talent leave without compensation though ... possibly with a franchise and trade? my guess is we give mario and foster their long term deals at the expense of a familiar name or two.
But if he's franchised isn't that then like 20M guaranteed ? That would be 1/6 or 1/7 of our entire cap wouldn't it ?
That was actually dalemurphy's favorite argument, Mario only beats TE's and patchwork O-lines. He kept harping on that and the fact that Mario isn't elite in coverage as to why he is such an underachiver
Chill dude.. Amobi Okoye had four sacks in his first four starts.
Trading Mario doesn't make us a better team.
To me, Mario is capable of being to the defense what Andre is to the offense. Maybe not exactly as great as dre but I think his presence puts us over the top and makes the unit that much better.
Offense has still put up points in dre's absence but I don't think you trade Andre because other receivers/te's step up and play well. Players as physically gifted as Mario and dre don't grow on trees.
Reed has been getting better and should continue to, but he is no Mario.
1 + 1 = 2lol... Does brooks reed remotely look anything like amobi okoye?![]()
If it frees up a crap load of cap space it does INDEED make us a better team. We can fill holes elsewhere and resign players like Arian Foster, so moving on without Mario can indeed make us a better team.
Obviously, since you don't value Mario very much, this make alot of sense to you. To us that highly value him, we don't think getting rid of him will make us better.
You can make the same argument about Foster since Tate is playing so well. I'm surprised people aren't suggesting we trade or do not re-sign Foster.
You must be crazy not to resign Foster! Pay the man when hes done well unlike guys named Chris Johnson and Peyton Hillis. Complain and then not perform well on the field. Praise Foster for just playing hard and not whinning. Pay him Rick lol
you and me both brother.
You know what i have to say to those people... We aren't "mario haters", they're overall "team haters". They have to knock everyone on the team down (antonio smith anyone) in order to elevate "their guy" even higher. They can't give any props when it's truly due to other players, if it might make their "guy" look less significant.
Give the man some props for stepping in and playing at a high level.
4 starts, 4 sacks. One away from the team lead. Brooks is putting together a pretty solid season since he was thrown into the fire. What more can you ask from a 2nd round rookie?
Anyone who wants Brooks instead of Mario is silly. BUT, it comes down to what will Mario's contract demands be?
Brooks has proven and can start and play well. He has issues, which hopefully can improve with experience and coaching.
If it frees up a crap load of cap space it does INDEED make us a better team. We can fill holes elsewhere and resign players like Arian Foster, so moving on without Mario can indeed make us a better team.