Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

**Official Game-Day Thread** Texans at Redskins, Sunday Nov 18, 2018!!

If we can get out of this with a win hopefully we can get our starting O-line heathy. Lord knows we have issues there anyway but with all the injuries we stand no chance going forward.
 
I can't rewind but I'll try to remember to review the kick later. Looked like a good spin, and kickers usually want the ball to have a slight lean - but hard to guess whether that was correct or not without knowing the kicker's preference.
 
I don't know, the last replay before commercial the nose of the ball is on the ground. I'm not sure what they're going to call. Although ruling on the field is a fumble, which is obviously isn't so that call gets reversed. Now the onus is proving that it was an interception, not proving that it WASN'T an interception.
 
The thing is: it was ruled a fumble. It definetly was not a fumble. Now was it an int or did it hit the ground. No clear evidence either way. I don't know how they decide this. They must overrule the fumble and then? Guess? Take the most likely? Replay the down?
 
I don't know, the last replay before commercial the nose of the ball is on the ground. I'm not sure what they're going to call. Although ruling on the field is a fumble, which is obviously isn't so that call gets reversed. Now the onus is proving that it was an interception, not proving that it WASN'T an interception.

Ball can touch the ground if it doesn't assist in the catch. That looks like an interception to me. But maybe the defender doesn't fully secure it before it gets to the ground again, who knows. Looks tough to overturn though.
 
There was one view that looked like Hopkins controlled it on while on the ground, and then had it ripped away. It's either a completion and down by contact, or an interception.
 
Ball can touch the ground if it doesn't assist in the catch. That looks like an interception to me. But maybe the defender doesn't fully secure it before it gets to the ground again, who knows. Looks tough to overturn though.

You can't have an INT after it touches the ground at all.
 
Ball can touch the ground if it doesn't assist in the catch. That looks like an interception to me. But maybe the defender doesn't fully secure it before it gets to the ground again, who knows. Looks tough to overturn though.

They didn't rule an interception, so throw that out the window. Was it a catch, fumble? Obviously not. Now, during the review was there clear possession that could NOW turn it into an interception, there's not a view of the football so that's impossible to call.
 
Back
Top