Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Texans positioning to make Free Agent/Trade Moves?

I think I'd be at least a little surprised if the Schobel deal went down now. I don't think they would've kept Nading OR Jamison if that was the case. Perhaps they would just cut one of the two because I'm pretty sure 3 RBs is scarier than 2 QBs.
 
Something is going on. Kubiak makes this cryptic comment the other day about how this team is going to look different, then there's this mysterious last spot open.

Something is going to go down.
 
dalemurphy said:
My understand was the recovery time was 4-6 weeks. So, I estimated he would miss three games. The fourth game would takes place on the 3rd of October... so, I thought that was a reasonable time frame.
Click to expand...

Three weeks (most optimistic prognosis) was what I related IF there were no MRI findings revealing significant associated ligament and fracture findings. When dislocation was revealed, I stated that these are not atypically associated with the aforementioned findings. Detailed findings have still not been released, but as I suspected, there must be significant joint associated damage (Grade III) resulting in prolonged recovery.

If conservative treatment fails to stabilize the joint, surgical reconstruction of the joint capsule, ligaments and articular cartilage may be necessary to restore proper alignment and function of more extreme cases. Grade III turf toes are the most likely to result in recovery setbacks, reinjury, chronic pain and progressive arthritic joint problems.
 
The Pencil Neck said:
So, looking at that, we're probably in the market for RB, LB, DT, or possibly an experienced CB to help mentor the 'kids'.
Click to expand...
On his Friday radio show on 610, Kubiak mentioned a 4th OT and a QB. That may be at the expense of players currently on the roster.
 
I don't expect a big move from the Texans, i believe they will take a hard look at some players, but eventually bring back someone familiar with what they do, also don't count out at least 2 players to make a quick jump from the PS back to the active roster.
 
The key point IMO regarding these statements by Schobel is, what date were they made. The exact same items, including the Monday thing, was stated 3-4 weeks ago. He then stated that he was in truth done and would stay retired. Now, maybe he has reversed course, but I suspect this is data that is stale.
 
I will be absolutely floored if Schobel comes in on Monday. Not saying it won't happen but I would really be shocked.

On the other hand, my guess is Kubiak is looking at a QB right now that is on the waiver wire. Kubiak, Smith, whatever.
 
Yes you do ha, and no problem. Not sure how much validity is in it. Jason La Canfora said nothing to it.
 
HoustonSportsFan09 said:
Texans claim former Red Raider and Dallas Cowboy CB Jamar Wall
Click to expand...

Analysis from CBSSports.com:

Read & React: Reads the body language and routes of receivers. Gets too aggressive, biting on pump fakes and double moves, but rarely is fooled twice. Attacks running plays to his side. Gets to other receivers when a teammate loses track of them.

Man Coverage: Coverage skills made opponents wary of throwing at Wall. Usually plays off in press-bail coverage, but he has the long arms and strong arms to be physical with receivers coming off the line. Good backpedal -- stays low and quick. Capable of sticking to his man in coverage on any route. Will be out-muscled downfield by larger receivers. Offenses try to take advantage of his lack of height in the red zone, but he has the vertical to compete against taller receivers.

Zone Coverage: Was left on an island in Tech's defense, but displays headiness and good change-of-direction ability to close on underneath routes.

Closing/Recovery: Reacts to the ball in the air, takes the correct angle when attacking the receiver to separate the ball from its target or secure the tackle. Good recovery speed after biting on double moves, but will resort to bumping receivers instead of trusting his speed.

Run Support: Usually positioned off the line, but does not tackle like a converted running back. Closes on the run quickly and wraps up consistently. Uses long arms and strength to stay clear or rip off most receiver blocks, but forces action inside if he can't disengage.

Tackling: Likes to hit, puts ballcarriers on the ground with a strong shoulder. Generally solid tackling in space, does not need to resort to cut tackling to bring down backs or receivers. Misses tackles occasionally when trying to make a hit. Should be an outstanding special teams gunner because of his speed and aggressiveness.

Intangibles: Does not back down from a challenge. Teammates respect his hard work and coaches trust him to be in the right spot and make the big play. Ran for 477 yards on 20 kickoff returns in 2008 and could get a chance there in training camp because of his strong running style.
 
Lucky said:
If he's a waiver claim, he must be put on the roster.
Click to expand...

Although I thought we might grab a CB to put on the team, I didn't think it was going to be a rookie.

And then a LB?

I guess we're going to go with 3 RBs to start the season. I'm perturbed we didn't get Bell (or someone)... assuming we don't get anyone else.
 
So that puts us at 53, right?

We'll have to cut someone if Schoble comes out of retirement, or if Kubiak wants another QB, right?
 
Lucky said:
If he's a waiver claim, he must be put on the roster.
Click to expand...

I thought that only applied if you were signing a player off someone else's practice squad, not someone who was cut. And the teams pick over the cut players in order of worst record first ? I could be wrong.....
 
Both players were claimed on waivers(so both are assigned to active roster, roster stands at 53). And havent seen anything yet on the PS
 
thunderkyss said:
So that puts us at 53, right?

We'll have to cut someone if Schoble comes out of retirement, or if Kubiak wants another QB, right?
Click to expand...

LZ just reminded Stradley that he talked to Schobel himself, and said Schobel said he wasn't coming back. FWIW. I hope he pulls an "at the time, my mind was made up...".
 
David Nixon !!?,...this LB spot should have been given to Isaiah Greenhouse, at least he's been in camp and knows the system a little.
 
JB said:
Texans claim Nixon

Texas claimed LB David Nixon from the Raiders

Link
Click to expand...

This from the article:

The Texans have identified seven memers of their eight-man practice squad.

They are: center Brett Helms, Offensive tackle Cole Pemberton, defensive tackle Malcom Sheppard, linebacker Isaiah Greenhouse, safety Torri Williams, receiver Bobby Williams and runningback Chris Ogbonnaya.

The Texans also released linebacker Danny Clark opejning up a spot on their 53-man roster.
Click to expand...

No Booty. At least not yet. However, there is still one more spot open on the PS.
 
Pick-ups seem solid. We will see. I am impressed with how they are methodically addressing all of our holes. The vibe theyr'e giving off is that they have a plan and a vision and is executing it. We'll see.
 
False Start said:
Schobel's agent was just on 610, and said he cant really say anything. He also added a "you never know." :thinking:
Click to expand...

Translation of the agent's comments: We're working on the dollars, and we want more than what the Texans probably want to give up.

He's saying there's communication, but he can't give specifics.

To me, that's indicating the issue is money.

I'd rather Schobel have that last spot than Leinart. Anybody agree?
 
GP said:
Translation of the agent's comments: We're working on the dollars, and we want more than what the Texans probably want to give up.

He's saying there's communication, but he can't give specifics.

To me, that's indicating the issue is money.

I'd rather Schobel have that last spot than Leinart. Anybody agree?
Click to expand...

I think I'd rather have Schobel taking snaps that Leinart!
 
GP said:
Translation of the agent's comments: We're working on the dollars, and we want more than what the Texans probably want to give up.

He's saying there's communication, but he can't give specifics.

To me, that's indicating the issue is money.

I'd rather Schobel have that last spot than Leinart. Anybody agree?
Click to expand...

Hell Yeah!
 
GP said:
Translation of the agent's comments: We're working on the dollars, and we want more than what the Texans probably want to give up.

He's saying there's communication, but he can't give specifics.

To me, that's indicating the issue is money.

I'd rather Schobel have that last spot than Leinart. Anybody agree?
Click to expand...

If it came down to Schobel or Leinart I think everyone would prefer Schobel. I doubt thats what is comes down to though. More likely they take both and cut someone like Nading or someone else with some PS eligibility. Is Nading still eligible anyway?
 
GP said:
Translation of the agent's comments: We're working on the dollars, and we want more than what the Texans probably want to give up.

He's saying there's communication, but he can't give specifics.

To me, that's indicating the issue is money.

I'd rather Schobel have that last spot than Leinart. Anybody agree?
Click to expand...

I think you would be hard pressed to find anyone who disagrees.
 
GP said:
Translation of the agent's comments: We're working on the dollars, and we want more than what the Texans probably want to give up.

He's saying there's communication, but he can't give specifics.

To me, that's indicating the issue is money.

I'd rather Schobel have that last spot than Leinart. Anybody agree?
Click to expand...

Sounds like it might be. I would rather have Dave Ragone than Leinart.
 
Jackie Chiles said:
Timing of this interview sure seems like there might be something to it. Did you catch the whole interview?
Click to expand...

Yeah, it was just a brief 3-4 minute segment, he said that the rumors were 95% false, thats when he added the "you never know." He said that he wasn't really able to say much more than that, so that might be why he threw the 95% thing in there, just so he wouldn't violate any NFL rules on negotiations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top