Wiegert to RT? (McClain Report)

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by The Dude Abides, Apr 1, 2006.

  1. The Dude Abides

    The Dude Abides Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,078
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    Texas
    Justice & McClain were talking on their audio at the chron.com. McClain says that Wiegert will be the RT, and the staff supposedly likes Weary, and will draft 2 more lineman. The teams wants more toughness and leadership.:redtowel:
     
  2. TEXANS84

    TEXANS84 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,480
    Likes Received:
    365
    Location:
    The Woodlands, TX
    If that is true...bye bye to Todd Wade.
     
  3. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    And hello yet another huge dead money cap hit ($6.7). Add that to Walker's $7.3 and chalk it up as the two worst contracts ever executed by this organization.
     
  4. TexanSam

    TexanSam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    17,071
    Likes Received:
    713
    I would still rather prefer a lineman who has played RT for the majority of his career. Would have loved if we got Ashworth. Maybe we'll draft a guy with our 2nd or 3rd round pick, but I'm not sure if I would rather have Weigert or a rookie starting. We'll see how training camp and such goes.
     
  5. Scooter

    Scooter Funky

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,354
    Likes Received:
    561
    please no, weigert's even slower than wade. wade's easy enough to beat with a wide speed rush, there wasnt any "beating" weigert though ... they just walked around him.
     
  6. Coach C.

    Coach C. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,422
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    SE Houston
    I have posted on this several times, this is old news. Weigert is solid at RT and he has played it earlier in his career. He is likely our secon best linemen when healthy and having the whole year at the tackle position he will do just fine. Weigert is no slower than George Foster of the Broncos.
     
  7. Runner

    Runner Hubcap Diamond Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    627
    The two fastest lineman during conditioning runs the past couple of weeks, usually by a good margin - Weigert and Wand. Interestingly enough, these are also two of the three lineman (along with Wade) frequently described on this board as "too slow". The runs I'm talking about are 20X110 and 20X40 yard sprints with one minute to rest in between. Note the runs consist of both offensive and defensive lineman.

    I know the next statement is usually "speed isn't quickness", but Wiegert and Wand are also quicker in drills and play conditions than they are given credit for, especially Wand.

    However, they are slow compared to the receivers, if that is what posters mean. :)
     
  8. Honoring Earl 34

    Honoring Earl 34 Hey Koolaid

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    19,719
    Likes Received:
    1,326
    Location:
    Houston
    My question would be ... why has Weary been ignored for all these years . He was the #1 center in 2002 .
     


  9. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Weary has had trouble with foot and hand work....dysfunctional coaching didn't help him much. He is very limber and is an excellent athlete for his size (if you watch him warm up he can just about do the splits). On Weigert and Walker, aj called these bad contracts for what they were years ago. Since both look like they will give us a massive amount of dead money he was bulls-eye from the get go on these.

    As Runner stated, Weigert is an excellent athlete. His big drawback is poor lateral movement. He is good at the second level (not all linemen are good at blocking smaller guys in space) and probably our best run blocker. He is going to get smoked from time to time on the edge in pass protection.
     
  10. Scooter

    Scooter Funky

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,354
    Likes Received:
    561
    i meant side to side. a tackle has to be able to move laterally to cover a much larger space than guards. weigert may get to the second level quicker than most, but he doesnt move backwards and laterally as well as a right tackle should. a guard running sprints is one thing, a tackle needs to be a lot more agile & able to slide out. that being said, i'm not high on weigert either way, sorry. i'm directing this at the passing game because while it's got a LOT of room for improvement, our run blocking isnt nearly as bad.
     
  11. dat_boy_yec

    dat_boy_yec All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    25
    I wouldn't believe McClain, I like to hear him talk sometimes because I love the Texans, but I think he's just making assumptions. Ala Young. I think Wand will get a shot at the line-up and Weigart will keep his spot. Even if you were to draft a lineman, why throw him out there before he's ready. Weary I could see him coming in, but still I think Weigart is a better option at guard and Wand at tackle. The two W's on the Weak side sound ok to me. Lol.
     
  12. TEXANS84

    TEXANS84 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,480
    Likes Received:
    365
    Location:
    The Woodlands, TX
    Was Ferens negotiating on both of those contracts?
     
  13. Marcus

    Marcus Ruthless pragmatist

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    8,276
    Likes Received:
    646
    Location:
    Stafford, Texas
    Well, with the new staff, they're probably looking at both Wade and Walker as more dead wood than dead money. I'd give them credit for at least facing reality and shucking the dead wood, and getting someone in here who can play.

    I'm sure the Texans are not the only team in the league who has dead money issues. Come to think of it, it would be nice to see a ranking of which teams owe the most dead money on the their respective caps.
     
  14. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    That's kind of like buying a stock at $50 and patting yourself on the back for selling at $30 as the price is headed toward zero. You don't spend 21 million in signing bonuses on two players and cut them two years later - that is if you want to remain in a competitive financial position. I can say with confidence that there aren't many teams carrying 14 mill of dead money on two guys - if it comes to that.

    I would assume Ferens nego'd both Walker's and Wade's. Walker was Capers guy and Dom panicked when he was about to become a FA in '03 or whenever it was. There was a lot of head scratching around the league when they gave him that $11 million bonus. I think they just misplayed the whole Wade deal - and Greenwood to a much lesser extent.

    We're starting to see more about how these deals came down in the past. I think McNair has tightened the screws significantly with the amout of guaranteed money he's willing to throw at one player. They gave Weaver $12 mill up front which is a ton - but at least he's young and he's the only one this year. However, McNair spoke publicly how Givens wasn't worth the 5 mill per shortly after he signed with Tenn... that was unusual and different to hear him say those words.

    Weigert played some LT at Jax so I was never really opposed to him lining up out there - once I saw he could still do it and that age and the injuries hadn't rendered him incapable.
     
  15. Runner

    Runner Hubcap Diamond Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    627
    I heard an interview with the Browns GM about their free agent moves this year. He said last year they took some painful dead money hits, but it set them up nicely for this year. At some point you've got to pay for bad contracts - over their length or a more painful one time hit.

    We may have to do the same as the Browns did if, for instance, Wade can't show more of his upside during camp.
     
  16. Runner

    Runner Hubcap Diamond Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    8,325
    Likes Received:
    627
    I think injuries will be Weigert's limiting factor the rest of his career.
     
  17. edo783

    edo783 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    7,712
    Likes Received:
    308
    Location:
    Houston, again.
    Isn't the dead cap money only for this year and gone by next?
     
  18. Keldar

    Keldar Veteran

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    9
    I don't think your suggesting to keep bums just because it's gonna be a financial loss. That being said, my two cents are as follows:

    Wade = liability - trade him, cut him, dump him, take your medicine for making a careless financial mistake. Do not keep bums just because we are gonna take a cap hit.
     
  19. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    Yea, its a one year deal, no amortization over multiple periods. That's why the
    cap hit is so potent. But only hurts for a little while.
     
  20. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    In the case of Walker, they could take the entire hit this year but they won't have room, especially if they dump Wade too. The current plan for ridding Walker's dead money as I understand it is to take $1.8 this year and $5.5 in '07. That's 5% of next year's cap spent on Gary Walker.

    Sure, sooner or later, every team is faced with challenging financial decisions, e.g., the Titans with McNair, the Colts with Edge ... BUT that's typically a situation you deal with for your star players - not the Todd Wade's or the broken down Gary Walker's of the world.
     

Share This Page