Why we are not elite

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by utahmark, Oct 13, 2010.

  1. utahmark

    utahmark markbeth

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    126
    Location:
    utah
    offensive line- Our o-line is finesse. Thats the way they were built. There are advantages to having a system and being able to put players that are not elite in that system. The biggest advantage is being able to save first round draft picks for other positions. We only have one first round pick in the bunch and most would say he is not a typical lt tackle. There is a problem with this as well. There are a few defensive fronts that are so much more talented than we are that they just blow up our o-line. You can't use your scheme when your being overpowered and out quicked.

    defensive line- Our d-line is composed of the type of talent that I would like our o-line to be made of. Lot's of first rounders. The problem with them is they are one dimensional. Our ends or strong and can overpower weaker or even average strength o-lineman. when they go up against big strong tackle's they seem to have problems. I think our interior line(supposed to be quick) has not developed into what the coaches wanted. They just get taken out by all but the weakest/slowest o-lineman.

    The problems with or o-line and d-line hinder what is the strengths of our team. Our skilled players on offense and our linebackers. Without the help up front these guys can't "do their thing".

    Now most teams are not good enough up front on defense or strong enough with their offensive line to exploit our weaknesses. There are a couple of average teams the match up well and most of the elite teams have what it takes to really create some match up problems. We only have two more games against teams that should be able to really give our line's trouble(Balt and NY). we should have a chance to win all the rest of our games but i think we might see more of what we saw against Dallas and the Giants against those two teams. Tenn is another team that should really give us problems but maybe being in our division and playing them twice a year helps keep us close against them.

    I'm not even close to being an expert but I watch a lot of football and I wanted to throw this our there and see if you guys agree.
     
  2. wagonhed

    wagonhed Team Gruden

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    194
    Location:
    Denton
    We aren't elite because we don't have elite coaches.
     
  3. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,617
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Over here.
    Our O-line isn't finesse. I know people call it that because they are small-ish, but they are just made more for running, getting blocks in the 2nd level, etc. than pass-blocking.

    I don't think our biggest problem is lack of talent. It's getting out-schemed, not calling the right plays on both sides of the ball, and sometimes it's lack of heart and effort.

    When you use small-ish linemen, you have to establish the run on offense. You also have to use what you've got on D and find a way to get to the QB. We now pretty much know that we should've blitzed Cushing more and probably dropped Mario back more in this last game. The coaches should've caught onto it DURING the game, but they didn't. You can't use small-ish O-linemen against large lined teams like the Giants and not establish the run. You've got to do it. You can't use small-ish, quick-ish D-linemen and not insist on finding a blitz or something that gets to the QB. You gotta get to him, unless the other teams passing game sux, and our secondary is going through a transition that screws even that up.

    It's true, we're not elite talent-wise, mainly because we have a rookie CB and IF we have good FS, he is inexperienced as well (Nolan), but most teams have weaknesses because of the salary cap. Most of our problems fall on the coaches. Get players ready both scheme-wise and emotionally for games and we will do just fine. Still don't see us beating the Ravens or Jets no matter how prepared, but we not really expected a championship just yet. Get to the playoffs. Do it...
     
  4. Norg

    Norg Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    5,076
    Likes Received:
    101
    we are built to win a SB over many years

    WE beat the colts heck there pretty good have been for years

    Has long has we take care of our biznas in the divison and get a few other wins here and there i think we will be fine
     
  5. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,617
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Over here.
    I remember when this team (under Capers) had large DLs that could out-muscle O-lineman and then chase the QB around....only they were WAY too slow to ever catch the QB. That drove us crazy too. A LB or somebody should've gotten involve and caught him, and that's the answer, but there are answers to make our current talent work as well.

    God, we used to wish we had small-ish, quick DLs. It's just been a long time and we've forgotten. Both types of D can work, but you've gotta scheme right.

    We should be able to run the ball on O against anybody....at least adequately. If we don't, it's lack of effort (Giants game) or lack of running plays called.
     
  6. gtexan02

    gtexan02 Working?

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    15,785
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Location:
    Boston
    So we're built to win a SB but we can't win outside of our own division?

    I dont see those two things working out well
     
  7. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,617
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Over here.
    He did say over many years (and you can't count the Capers regime, which was just a total bust).
     
  8. J_R

    J_R Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,645
    Likes Received:
    159
    Having a hard time winning in the division
     


  9. JB

    JB Old Curmudgeon

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    28,482
    Likes Received:
    813
    Location:
    In Transit
    Last year, we were all calling for a team that could win in our own division.
     
  10. Norg

    Norg Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    5,076
    Likes Received:
    101
    building a ..... Culture like the steelers takes time

    we are building a long term Team ...

    last year we used to be good in the NFC ..

    i think we are elite we beat the teams we are supposed to beat alla the raiders and prob going to beat the cheifs

    who knows giants might be that good prob a SB bound team who knows
     
  11. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,617
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Over here.
    We're ready to make the playoffs, even if it has to be with a WC. That's where we are.
     
  12. CretorFrigg

    CretorFrigg Fire Rick Smith

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,076
    Likes Received:
    214
    Location:
    Texas
    Really, it's not just our o-line and d-line. Our secondary is pretty darn bad too.
     
  13. utahmark

    utahmark markbeth

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    126
    Location:
    utah
    that's true. i do think playing to much zone has hurt them. i blame their poor play more on coaching than i do the line play.

    i just think line play is sometimes undervalued. you could win a superbowl with great line play and be ave everywhere else. hard to win against the best teams without talented lines.
     
  14. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,463
    Likes Received:
    982
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    We are scoring points and for the most part shutting down the run. We are giving up too much passing yardage. This is due to the way we set up the DBs to charge the line rather than to play off the receivers and run with them. Our DTs are not meant to get to the QB but stop the run and allow the DEs and LBs to disrupt the QB. This can work against most teams but Mario and Antonio have to step it up. I think Williams' groin may have been more a factor than has been said.

    I think Kubes took a huge gamble in selecting Kareem Jackson AND letting Reeves go. It might pay off eventually but we will not know for a while. The good new is we should be 4-2 and have the week before the bye and after to prepare for Colts. D. Brown should be back and Cushing should be snapped in. Nolan should be more prepared to start and Williams, AJ and JJ should all be 100 %. Hopefully OD will be a factor. Schaub should have a good game this week and get over some of the physical and emotional bruises.

    I'd rather not have Mario drop back into coverage EVER.
     
  15. Lucky

    Lucky Moderator

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,278
    Likes Received:
    1,473
    How can Kubiak be criticized for letting Reeves go, when none of the 31 remaining teams in the league signed him? You can criticize Kubiak and Smith for not tagging Dunta, or finding another CB in free agency. Or not. But Kubiak has been proven correct in releasing Reeves, a fringe NFL player who is now on the outside looking in.
     
  16. Texanmike02

    Texanmike02 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    8,261
    Likes Received:
    752
    I think we should have kept reeves for one reason and one reason only. We needed a vet in the secondary. I know we have coaches etc... but with KJ coming in I think a veteran player would have helped immensely in his development. He's seen manning and co several times... Maybe I'm wrong but if Paymah is the best we can do and he's not going to get on the field much a vet counselor would have been nice instead.

    Mike
     
  17. bckey

    bckey Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,335
    Likes Received:
    151

    We have NEVER taken care of biznas in our division under Kubiak. The year the Texans get a winning division record will be Kubiaks first. He blows against oponents that know him best.
     
  18. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,617
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Over here.
    The bolded is true? I thought they WERE supposed to (for DTs anyway) and just weren't getting it done.
     
  19. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,814
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Texas

    We've shown flashes of being very good. Shutting down Washington in the second half, playing well for all but 13 snaps against Dallas, even some very good series against the Giants.

    Our issue isn't a lack of fire, or being unprepared. It's about consistency and focus. We've got Brian back, hopefully we'll start trusting each other to do their job & stop trying to do too much.

    & I get what you're saying, but it would be sweet if the big guy gets an INT.... Or better, a Pic-6
     
  20. Lucky

    Lucky Moderator

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,278
    Likes Received:
    1,473
    Jacques Reeves never developed during his 6 year career. Once his physical skills began to erode, he lacked the technique and smarts to fall back on. How could Reeves become an example of how to play, when he couldn't play, either?

    Do the Texans need a veteran CB? Yes, I agree 100%. Should that veteran CB be Jacques Reeves? Absolutely not.
     

Share This Page