Why is holding a 10 yard penalty?

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by dream_team, Dec 18, 2011.

  1. dream_team

    dream_team Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    106
    Just wondering... I can understand on passing plays, a hold could save a sack, which usually causes a loss of more than 5 yards. But on running plays, 10 yards may be too steep for the penalty.

    IMO, holding on passing plays should stay a 10 yard penalty. But on running plays, should be only a 5 yard penalty.
     
  2. TimeKiller

    TimeKiller Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,648
    Likes Received:
    548
    Location:
    This giant tree, standing 10,000 ft. high but not
    Who cares? They only call it when they need to change the outcome of the game. Like 3 seconds in basketball. Holding is the biggest BS call in football, it's on every play but only called when it'll help out a good or popular team.
     
  3. kastofsna

    kastofsna Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,438
    Likes Received:
    245
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    it used to be 15 yards.
     
  4. Wolf6151

    Wolf6151 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,608
    Likes Received:
    132
    Location:
    Pearland, Texas
    Like TK said it happens on every play and seems to be selectively enforced.
     
  5. Nawzer

    Nawzer Alienz

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,584
    Likes Received:
    355
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I agree that the 10 yard penalty is a bit too harsh. If it happens on every play, the penalty should be less severe. I would like to see a 5 yard penalty for holding.
     
  6. Blake

    Blake MMQB

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    11,201
    Likes Received:
    615
    Location:
    Spring
    There is no way the officials can watch all the trench fights on every play. The penalty must be severe so the player fear's being caught. Also holding seems to turn modest gains into booming plays. They must be held in check.
     
    Showtime100 likes this.
  7. GP

    GP Go Texans!

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,573
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    It should be Loss Of Down.

    So on 1st and 10, you're on your own 20-yard-line. You run or pass the ball, and you gain 10 yards...but someone on the offense was holding. It becomes 2nd down and 10, with the ball still on your own 20-yard-line.

    Doesn't negatively impact the offense and doesn't give the defense an edge by making the offense have a 1st and 20.

    HOWEVER...an offense might be more tempted to push the limits of holding on a crucial 2nd and 1 or something short yardage...because the reward might outweigh the risk: You get caught holding on 2nd and 1??? OK, you still have 3rd and 1 to work with.

    So maybe my idea is not the best one. LOL.
     
  8. PsychoLove

    PsychoLove Church Of FSM

    Joined:
    May 10, 2006
    Messages:
    463
    Likes Received:
    32
    I think it is fair. I wish they would have a technical foul call ala NBA, when a player whines about not getting a pass interference call and such!
     
  9. Texan_Bill

    Texan_Bill Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    48,637
    Likes Received:
    2,075
    Location:
    Houston. Mediocrity Lives Here!!
    Holding is only a 5 yard penalty..........




    Defensive holding that is, but it is an automatic first down. :pirate:
     
  10. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,613
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Over here.
    I do think offensive penalties should be more focused on loss-of-down (than yards moved backwards). You cheat, you lose the down (play). You shouldn't get to try and throw a 40 yard pass on the same down after you committed a hold on a run play. Why should the O ever get to replay a down that they just got caught cheating on?
     
  11. GP

    GP Go Texans!

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,573
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    How about this idea:

    1. You're on your own 20, and on 1st down your offensive lineman gets called for holding.

    2. The ball gets backed up 10 yards to the 10, and it becomes 2nd and 10 from the 10. (The new first down marker is at the 20).

    It's the best of both worlds. The offense loses forward progress, by having to back up 10 yards, but the offense doesn't have to get 20 yards to get a first down. In essence, it's a 20-yard scenario but it makes 2nd and 3rd down much more manageable for an offense...yet they screwed themselves by losing 10 yards of field position.
     
  12. Showtime100

    Showtime100 Got AJ?

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    21,480
    Likes Received:
    1,483
    Location:
    Austin,Tx
    *BAM*

    That is why holding is a 10-yard penalty. 15 is too severe, 5 is not enough of a deterent, 10 will stay in a players head.
     
  13. Blake

    Blake MMQB

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    11,201
    Likes Received:
    615
    Location:
    Spring
    Agreed. Against a decent defense, 10 yards is almost a drive killer. Linemen do not want to be the guy that killed a drive.
     
  14. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,083
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    I read somewhere back around 1974, when the NFL changed the penalties for offensive holding, illegal use of the hands, and tripping from 15 yards to 10 yards, that the reasoning was something like this. In the case, IF the play COULD have resulted in a first down, there would be compensation and was severe enough for an UNKNOWN. In the case, IF the play WOULD NOT have resulted in a first down, it would not be too severe.
     
  15. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,613
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Over here.
    I think I like that. :thinking:
     
  16. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,083
    Likes Received:
    1,376
  17. kastofsna

    kastofsna Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,438
    Likes Received:
    245
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    this is pretty terrible and fixes a problem that isn't even a problem. it sucks to lose 10 yards, but uh...don't hold?
     
  18. Rey

    Rey Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,475
    Likes Received:
    671
    Its a fair penalty and its not a bs call. While there might be a little holding on ant given play they mostly call the egregious ones that are cllosest to the play. Yeah sometimes the refs make questionable calls but that isn't exclusive to holding penalties.
     
  19. eriadoc

    eriadoc Texan-American

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    19,009
    Likes Received:
    1,863
    It's a 10 yard penalty because the only thing stopping offenses these days are penalties, so the league needs it. :D
     
    bah007 likes this.

Share This Page