What is the June 1st agreement mean here for the Texans

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by whiskeyrbl, Mar 17, 2006.

  1. whiskeyrbl

    whiskeyrbl Guest

    Texans | G. Walker falls under new June 1 rule
    Thu, 16 Mar 2006 22:56:00 -0800

    ESPN.com's John Clayton reports the Houston Texans released DE Gary Walker under the new post June 1 free agency rule. He is free to sign with other teams now, but he will remain on the teams' cap sheet until June 1. On June 1, his cap number will be cleared off.

    :confused:
    Does this mean no $ of his contract goes against our cap?
     
  2. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    The way I understand it, his entire dead money hit ($7.3 million) is carried on the Texans cap until June 1. After June 1, only this year's prorated portion ($1.8 million) is carried on this year's cap and the rest ($5.5) will be moved to next year. It all has to be accounted for one way or another.

    People are wondering why the Texans aren't more active in free agency. Signing players to stupid long term contracts with double-digit signing bonues and then cutting them two years later is one reason.

    But, I guess they could be making a deal or two behind the scenes now that won't go into effect until June when the $5.5 is freed up.
     
  3. TheOgre

    TheOgre Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    3,739
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Back in the cellar again
    They have to count at least $1.8 million against this year's cap, but couldn't they opt to count some of that additional $5.5 million against this year's cap too to reduce the amount of dead money on 2007's cap?
     
  4. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    That's the way it used to work. You could take the entire hit in the current year if you wanted to. I assume that's still the case.
     
  5. barzilla

    barzilla Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Webster
    Either way, you have to consider the case that since big name free agents don't want to come here anyway it doesn't make much sense for us to use all 5.5 million this year. Sure, you might get that one player that turns you into an 8-8 team versus a 7-9 team. Yet, you would have to purge like we did before this last season and we all know what happened. I would prefer incremental progress even if means we only get Putzier and maybe one other guy.
     

Share This Page