Seriously? I mean.. we had a defensive genius for a head coach, but our DC ran the defense and it sucked. Pendry and Palmer ran the offense and it sucked. Our strength was our special teams which was ran by Marciano... I know people will disagree with that ST comment but thats not the point.. the point is that our "head coach" seemed more like a figurehead than someone who actually DID anything. Is that fairly common with head coaches? if so.. why are we bothering to debate about who the best choice is? Shouldnt we be looking at who is available to be our OC and DC, and just pick the guy who looks best on TV for our HC?