What do you think of all these teams switching to a 3-4?

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by TheRealJoker, Feb 23, 2009.

  1. TheRealJoker

    TheRealJoker Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,793
    Likes Received:
    272
    Location:
    Conroe
    With all the DE/OLB hybrids coming out along with the Steelers/Ravens again showing what a proper 3-4 defense looks like it seems everyone and their mother wants to switch to a 3-4. Problem is I dont think there's enough NTs to go around. The 3-4 begins and ends with a dominant NT, I think one of them is going to get that with BJ Raji, but the rest are gonna have to hope and prey they hit big in the draft or FA.
     
  2. Ole Miss Texan

    Ole Miss Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    8,688
    Likes Received:
    685
    I wouldn't be surprised if next year or the year after is a big draft on 4-3 DEs. Then all these teams' fans will be thinking "what if we switch back to a 3-4!?"
     
  3. bah007

    bah007 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    9,494
    Likes Received:
    469
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    There are always trends in football. Always have been and always will be. People see a good idea and take it and try to put their own spin on it and see how it works.

    A couple of years ago Tampa was killing people with the cover 2 scheme they use and so half the league tried to adapt their defense to that scheme.

    In college football a few select teams ran the spread to perfection and now half of college football uses it.

    These days in the NFL the trendy things are the "Wildcat" offense and the 34 zone blitz defense.

    And in a few years it will be something else.
     
  4. Goldensilence

    Goldensilence hipster elite

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,208
    Likes Received:
    352
    Location:
    Austin
    For every Steelers and Ravens 3-4 there is a Cleveland and San Fran. Gotta know the right personnel and how to utilize them.

    My curiousity is if you are having trouble running(or matching personnell for) a base 4-3 why switch to a much more difficult to operate defense?

    To me that like like a teen having trouble driving a automatic transmission car and then you thinking it's a great idea for them to try driving standard.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2009
  5. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    I think the 3-4 is superior because its easier to staff than the 4-3: not as difficult to find ''tweener'' OLBs as 4-3 DEs or 3-4 run stuffers vs the 300 lb penetrating one-gapper DTs.
    I regretted that Kubiak didn't retain the system when he came here subject to what his DC wanted to use. What difference did it make to Kubiak, he's an offensive coach ?
     
  6. Jackie Chiles

    Jackie Chiles Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    130
    Location:
    Houston
    With Mario though we really have a leg up on most 4-3 teams. We need another true end but we have one prototype. Hey, maybe if enough teams keep switching to the 3-4 it will be the true 4-3 ends that slip through the cracks, hah.
     
  7. The1ApplePie

    The1ApplePie Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    9,956
    Likes Received:
    519
    Dom Capers Texans is a great example of how a 3-4 fails

    You need an elite NT and an elite FS or SS to make it work before anything else.

    Drafting Wilfork instead of Robinson could have done wonders
     
  8. WesmanTexanfan

    WesmanTexanfan SeNior Smack

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,986
    Likes Received:
    138
    Location:
    Braeswood area
    I think It will eventualy be the norm in Pro Football, Athletes are getting bigger and faster and when you have guys that are that flexible youd be pretty dumb to not take advantage of that talent...

    They call it a 3-4, but really its a mix of the 2. Why play one when you can play both.....
     

Share This Page