Utilizing our tight ends

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by shinerbock_girl, Nov 29, 2004.

  1. shinerbock_girl

    shinerbock_girl Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    2,256
    Likes Received:
    35
    Location:
    San Antonio
    I agree with the announcers Sunday, why don't we utilize our TE's more??....Seems like we need some surprises going in our game stragedy to throw teams off....
     
  2. TheOgre

    TheOgre Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    3,739
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Back in the cellar again
    I really think we need someone that can block AND catch. I don't have a problem with us going out and getting another one. If Joppru pans out too then we are doubly blessed at the position. Right now it is one of our weakest starting positions.
     
  3. shinerbock_girl

    shinerbock_girl Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    2,256
    Likes Received:
    35
    Location:
    San Antonio
    Hey any news when Joppru is coming back???? Sure wish it was in time for the Jets...
     
  4. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    I think they will put Joppru on IR tomorrow. He will probably be our starter next season. I hear they like what they see in practice.

    We don't use our TE's much in routes because they just are not that good. If you are going to put Billy Miller in a pattern you may as well put in Armstrong. Armstrong gets more seperation and is a better target than Miller. Miller can't block so it tips off the opposition to our intentions. Bruenner is a blocking TE. He is a small Tackle.
     
  5. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,620
    Likes Received:
    656
    Location:
    Over here.
    I know Miller can't block, mainly because I've heard that so many times before, but then why did we do so well, running even, against Tennesee? Could it be that he helps the running game , by catching passes over the middle, more than he hurts it by not being a better blocker? I'm just thinking that, until somebody else comes along, that using Miller is maybe better than using Bruener, who never catches passes.
     
  6. texacutor

    texacutor Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    For the elevendy-seventh time, why don't we see what Murphy can or cannot contribute to the TE position? Can he do any worse than what we have going now? I look at Gates SD, Franks GB, etc., and they are doing great because they are getting a chance to show what they can do. We signed him,why not use him? :hmmm:
     
  7. Porky

    Porky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Messages:
    12,482
    Likes Received:
    990
    Why not use both Miller and Armstrong at different times. Why does it have to be either/or? When Armstrong is in, with a 4 WR formation, the defense will probably go to a dime package. But, with Miller and Bruener in the game, they would likely have the standard package on D. If they play Miller in a 3 wr set, they probably have a nickel package in. If Miller is matched up with a LB, that to me is at least as good as Armstrong on a nickel or dime corner. What I am getting at is that I like to mix things up. The more predictable you are, the easier the opponent can game plan against you. I think my position was proven correct last Sunday. Miller caught four balls, including a TD, and it seemed to throw the Titans off.
     
  8. El Tejano

    El Tejano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    9,940
    Likes Received:
    449
    Vinny, can you explain what the difference is in our offense when we use BMiller/TEs? One thing I noticed was how it made our redzone offense much better. Usually teams have let us dink and dunk all the way downfield until we get in the redzone and then key on Davis after that to stall us. Seemed like once we used BMiller before getting in the redzone, they could no longer just key on Davis.

    Any reason this wasn't used earlier? Was DArmstrong's emergence that much of an issue?
     


  9. Chance_C

    Chance_C Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,526
    Likes Received:
    78
    Location:
    Livingston Texas
    I remember Miller being utilized alot Sunday. I even remember a pretty good block by Miller. But, I agree, we need a real tight end. Maybe it's Joppru.
     
  10. Boris

    Boris All Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    13
    does anyone know how often we line-up w/our fullback? It seems like an obvious plus for our running game to have a lead blocker.......

    ProFootballWeekly.com

     
  11. Chance_C

    Chance_C Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,526
    Likes Received:
    78
    Location:
    Livingston Texas
    Norris had some blocks Sunday that will make it hard to keep him out of the lineup.
     
  12. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,620
    Likes Received:
    656
    Location:
    Over here.
    Yeah, we need to use a lead blocker. There's a reason that they all use a blocking back. I use to think blocking backs were pretty useless and preferred the extra slot receiver or an extra TE, but what did I know.

    Here's an oddball idea. Take out the TE. Go with the I-formation, but with no TE and use 3 wide-outs. In other words, just switch out the TE for armstrong. I think Vinnie already mentioned that, but I don't know if he was serious. Sort of like the run-n-shoot, but with a blocking back and one less receiver. We could call it the I-in-shoot, lol.

    I don't want to make this a regular thing, but I'd like to see it occasionally (I think?). I don't know. Maybe it's a dumb idea?

    Right now, I just kinda wanna see more of Miller again.
     
  13. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    When the field shrinks in the red zone there is no longer enough area for the 3-step short throws on slants, hitches and the RB dump-off pass. Carr really struggles inside the pocket. I mean, he really struggles. Most of his big completions are outside the pocket when he is on the run. Carr is not a very good passer in the pocket.
     
  14. El Tejano

    El Tejano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    9,940
    Likes Received:
    449
    So this is why there is such a difference when we use our TEs?
     
  15. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    What's the big difference? Armstrong has caught several clutch passes in lieu of Miller this year. Miller had a TD on a broken play but it wasn't the scheme or the fact that he was a TE that created that TD.
     
  16. Reddevil63

    Reddevil63 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,253
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Arlington
    I wonder if this has anything to do with his side-armed delivery or if he became gun-shy after getting pounded his first year.
     

Share This Page