Up to 17th on Fox Sports Power Rankings

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by markn, Sep 11, 2007.

  1. markn

    markn All Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    129
    Location:
    NW Houston
    Apologies if already posted, couldn't find it on here...

    The Texans beat the Chiefs 20-3, marking the team's first three-game winning streak (dating back to last season) in franchise history. Matt Schaub had a solid debut, guiding the Texans with a 16-for-22 effort, good for 225 yards and a touchdown. Andre Johnson continued where he left off last season with seven catches for 142 yards and a TD, and the young defense kept Larry Johnson to an eye-popping 43 yards. Houston is a potential sleeper team in the AFC this year. If they keep playing the way they did Sunday, we could be talking about them come January.

    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/powerRankings
     
    threetoedpete likes this.
  2. bah007

    bah007 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    467
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    Yea this is reliable. Nearly half of the top 5 has a winning percentage of 0.

    It looks like the preseason AP Poll for college football.

    How many losing teams are we ranked behind?
     
  3. markn

    markn All Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    129
    Location:
    NW Houston
    Yeah, but FWIW it's something vaguely positive from the mainstream media for a change...
     
  4. bigbrewster2000

    bigbrewster2000 4th Infantry

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,350
    Likes Received:
    112
    Location:
    The Woodlands
    I don't really think muck of these rankings , especially when a team loses and moves up 3 spaces ( see Bills), regardless of whether it was a last second loss or not.
     
  5. Mike Kerns

    Mike Kerns LYSB Podcast

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    97
    Location:
    West Houston
    I prefer flying under the radar, but some love is nice for a change.
     
  6. threetoedpete

    threetoedpete Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Messages:
    6,644
    Likes Received:
    197
    Location:
    Katy, Texas
    Rep your way for at least looking through the treads there rook. You just beat out 99% of the knuckle dragers who post in here.
     
  7. Tedc

    Tedc Hardheaded

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    5,299
    Likes Received:
    349
    Location:
    Bull Pen
    It is realistic.

    Would you rather have the Bears behind the Texans just because they lost and we won?

    You have to consider the opponent the teams played and how they played in the loss.
     
  8. BigBull17

    BigBull17 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    5,121
    Likes Received:
    228
    Location:
    Friendswood
    Yeah, NO being #5 after COMPLETE distruction is enough to disreguard.
     
  9. bah007

    bah007 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    9,491
    Likes Received:
    467
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    I think you have to prove how good you are.

    You shouldn't be ranked in the top 5 just cuz you lost to a good team.

    Just cuz a team was good last year doesn't mean they will be good this year.

    Bears & Saints are ranked on last year's record in those rankings.
     
  10. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    12,961
    Likes Received:
    544
    the Panthers are #13

    one week at a time, one week at a time :cool:
     
  11. Mike Kerns

    Mike Kerns LYSB Podcast

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    97
    Location:
    West Houston
    I agree AND disagree. Chargers are early Super Bowl favorites. Colts are the defending champs. So, even as much as Id love to see them flop, I think you have to give the Saints the benefit of the doubt. And if the Bears had a QB as good as even David Carr, their defense gave them a chance to win. At least they played a good game, unlike the Saints.

    So, are they getting props from last years record? Maybe. But when they drop games to the Raiders and Browns, then I will start preaching about a major drop in these rankings.

    Just my .02 cents
     
  12. Tedc

    Tedc Hardheaded

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    5,299
    Likes Received:
    349
    Location:
    Bull Pen
    Vey true. How else would you rank them so early in the season?

    I don't rank teams but if I were to do so, i would have to determine where they were last year when it is the first or second game and I would consider their opponent and how well or badly they played. I think the Saints should be lower (IMO) but how much lower would you put them and behind what teams?

    I felt, watching the Indy game, that it really didn't matter who they were playing. The Colts were on a roll and were going to win.
     
  13. Thorn

    Thorn Dirty Old Man

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    24,056
    Likes Received:
    1,814
    Location:
    Houston
    These "rankings" by various sites are fun to read, but I've never put a lot of stock in them. I don't think the Texas are quite ready yet to be placed in the middle of the pack of the NFL, but they should be by the end of this season (baring any more injury's of course).
     
  14. Mike Kerns

    Mike Kerns LYSB Podcast

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    97
    Location:
    West Houston
    Exactly. Just like whoever played the Saints in that first game back at the Superdome wasnt going to stand a chance.
     
  15. powerfuldragon

    powerfuldragon g'mornin to you

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    17,109
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Location:
    your lady's sexdreams.
    whoa. they mentioned january.
     
  16. euro-Texan

    euro-Texan All Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    956
    Likes Received:
    70
    Location:
    Glynco, GA
    I'm sorry but had we lost to Indy by a FG in OT we would be ranked somewhere around Oakland and the Browns. The fact is the National media never watched this game. They read some box score info, assumed that KC just had a terrible day and won't give us any attention until we have 4-1 or 5-2 record.
     
  17. euro-Texan

    euro-Texan All Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    956
    Likes Received:
    70
    Location:
    Glynco, GA
    I have to admit that I enjoy reading these football experts mention our starting LT as J Black days before the game. As I also enjoyed the dedicated analyists refering to our AJ/Moulds tandem as recently as the begining of camp. Believe me they are not watching..... YET!
     
  18. Leahmic223

    Leahmic223 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    1,076
    Likes Received:
    52
    After the Colts pal comes the Falcons, Dolphins, The Tacks and the other Kitty Kats the ones we love to beat up on...I say there is a pretty good chance we will start to get some respect.

    You are right though, had we loss to the Pats by 3 points, it would have been some crap like how the Pats tried to keep it close or some mess like that.
     
  19. Speedy

    Speedy Yeller Dweller

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,403
    Likes Received:
    413
    Location:
    The Livable Forest
    FWIW, the Texans are 7-7 in their last 14 games. And of course, all but 1 of those games was with the old #8.

    They're certainly better than that team, right?

    Are they turning the corner? I don't know. Since only 2 of those wins were on the road, they're going to have to start winning away from Reliant before I start thinking possible playoffs.
     
  20. samomin

    samomin Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    144
    Likes Received:
    1
    Historically Foxsports has usually rated Texans higher than ESPN in their power rankings.
     

Share This Page