Traditional WR setup and why we dont need anyone else

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by Grid, Mar 15, 2005.

  1. Grid

    Grid Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    244
    So, I do NOT support the drafting of another WR. Fact of the matter is that we are pretty much set at WR and do not need much, if any, more help there. We need help at DL, OL, and LB.

    So.. traditionally.. and I use the term lightly.. a more fitting term would be "on average", WRs are set up like this.

    #1 the all around talented player. He can run, he can catch, he can jump, he can run precise routes. This is your superstar.

    Texans: A.J.

    #2 Your possession receiver. This is a guy that isnt necessarily fast, but is physical and athletic. he makes the hard catches and knows how to get open.

    Texans: Armstrong (hes a perfect fit)

    #3 Your speedster. He doesnt have to be an especially gifted receiver.. he just needs to be the fastest guy on the field and has to catch the ball at least 75% of the time.

    Texans: Starling (he fits)



    this is how you will see alot of teams set up at WR.. and as you can see we already have the personel to do this. Now, maybe we run a different system.. maybe we want to stretch the field more and go for that big play more often..so we need another "total package" receiver at #2 to do that. But the fact of the matter is that we have all the peices we need to have an effective WR group.

    I also realize that I didnt include Gaffney in this comparison. I love gaffney.. but im not so sure he will be effective in a system that uses a setup like this. IMO he is the kind of guy who knows how to exploit a defense that has been stretched thin.. not the kind of guy who will get open and make the catch regardless of what the situation is (like armstrong).

    Also.. im not a member of the Texans coaching crew so I have no way of knowing if Armstrong is the kind of player I think he is.. or if Gaffney isnt a better possession receiver.. or if Starling is even ready to take the field in a real game. So, take this for what its worth.


    Anyway. I dont see WR being high on our list of needs.. even when Casserly mentioned us going for a WR he said that we MIGHT be interested in grabbing a WR... meaning.. it is not a sure thing or a pressing need. With all of our needs in other places.. and all the positions which we NEED young talent at (our WRs are incredibly young and do not need more youth).. I just dont see us taking a WR unless it is the ABSOLUTE BPA, and the only chance I see of that happening is if Williams or Edwards falls to #13.. and if that happens I think we would be more likely to use it as leverage for a nice trade down.

    my :twocents:
     
  2. D-ReK

    D-ReK RAWWWRR!

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    3,406
    Likes Received:
    99
    Location:
    Avalon
    I'm D-ReK, and I approve this message...

    I think our WRs are set for next year unless Williams or Edwards falls or we take a speedster in the late rounds to take over for Moses...

    Everyone seems to believe that we need a speedy #2 to take pressure off AJ, but I think that as he continues to develop as an all-around receiver, his improved route-running will allow him to get the separation he needs...
     
  3. ATX

    ATX Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    9,563
    Likes Received:
    286
    Location:
    Austin
    We still need one more reciever. how long wil bradford be here? will he even be here in 2005? what if Gaffney or johnson get injured? are you comfortable with gaffney and armstrong starting? Starling has yet to do anything to be a #3 or #4 WR. We need a #2 WR that is somewhere inbetween AJ and gaffney/Armstrong. I think we'll take a WR in the second round if not the first round.
     
  4. Texan in Japan

    Texan in Japan All Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    25
    Location:
    Colorado
    I think if a WR is BPA in any round, we'll look hard at them. However, I tend agree that we have some good talent (add Sloan Thomas to mix), but it really hinges on how coaches feel that Starling and Thomas are progressing...to meet our need for speed.
     
  5. edo783

    edo783 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    7,713
    Likes Received:
    308
    Location:
    Houston, again.
    IMO, the only reason we should take another WR is if the coaching staff doesn't think any of the guys behind AJ can be a quality #2. I suspect that Starling can be one, but I don't know, they do. If we wind up taking one in the first or second, then that question is answerd. After those rounds, if we take one, we are just looking at a possible up grade for what we have ie. competition.
     
  6. Holden135

    Holden135 Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    3
    I also disagree with selecting a wr in the first round this year. I think the second round would be a good time to find another wr. Parish of Miami and Henry of WVU should still be available at this point and i think they would be solid picks. In my opinion solidifying the o-line or the d-line would be much more beneficial for the first round since you can't really expect to find a solid 2nd round lineman unless possibly Bass falls but from all the reports i am hearing it doesnt look like he would fall that far into the 2nd round
     
  7. royce1054

    royce1054 All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    HOUSTON
    wow hoooooooo.... your #2 is speed burner the one that stretches the field.. goes deep... the one who takes a Safety away from Johnson

    a #3 goes over a middle and catches the hard passes. The ones that will hurt if your not careful.... Take a look at the colts.... They are doing right with their WR.
     
  8. gg no re

    gg no re iggnorent

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    522
    Colts are different setup I believe.... their TEs are their possession receivers while everyone else just burns the corners.
     


  9. royce1054

    royce1054 All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    HOUSTON
    their TE got cut hes now a Lion... Pollard could of been like miller... i do agree we need to throw to out TE more
     
  10. ThaShark316

    ThaShark316 #28

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,410
    Likes Received:
    196
    Location:
    Rosharon, TX
    I'm starting to that even if we paid a great WR cheap money, Grid would blast the FO. :heh:


    Look, if we don't get another WR in the draft, then we better have JG @ the #2, I can't live with Armstrong @ #2, slot WR...an emphatic YES!

    I'm callin my shot now..

    Texans will draft Chris Henry in the 2nd rd. :thumbup
     
  11. royce1054

    royce1054 All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    HOUSTON
    Henry has attitude Issues... i am not tottally sure if he matches what texans want to do.
     
  12. ThaShark316

    ThaShark316 #28

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,410
    Likes Received:
    196
    Location:
    Rosharon, TX

    Attitude...like thats something the Texans have in the locker...we need a spark...

    ^^^^^best I could do to shoot down ur point :heh:


    So what if he has an attitude, that might change in a NFL locker room...
     
  13. royce1054

    royce1054 All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    HOUSTON
    Peek can do that by himself. The question is can he channel that onto the field.... and make his play their and not be like a MOSS or some one else who loses his composure. (sp**) If he can do that i have no problem with henry... henry is #8 on my board. I think is going to depend on if Roddy White slips to 2nd or not. If he does then i see us taking a Reggie Brown or Fred Gibson. To do that we would have to not draft williamson and draft Barron or Barnes who is climbing on my board. Barnes is turning out to be a riser. Keep an eye on him.. He played at Washington he has played against some NFL talent.
     
  14. powda

    powda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,579
    Likes Received:
    287
    theres room on this team for a first day pick at wr...with the depth in free agency and the draft itself i think we'll see some good talent at wr slip...

    i think williamson will be there at 13 and he may be the bpa on the board when we select...

    i think based on cc's bpa tendencies the likelyhood of us selecting a rb,wr, or cb are the highest......theres just more talent and potential for them to be available at the high end of the first round.

    and i do think theres a need for a wr on this team...bradford's gone. gaffney will not be a superstar but a role player instead. armstrong may have the best hands on the team ,but dosent have the speed or quickness to be a serious gamebreaker. as for starling....i know he has great tools but im lost as to why so many people in here forecast him as a superior player in the future. his production has been limited exclusivley to preseason.
     
  15. Xman

    Xman Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    335
    Likes Received:
    6
    I think WR is still the way to go.

    The arguments about what happened last year (that we didn't go to our #2 guy) are based on decisions the coaches made to utilize the talent they had (or didn't have).
    AJ established himself as a stud. Next year, everyone will double cover him (CB close and a safety deep) - especially if he is our only threat at WR. So, we need another threat to lineup on the other side of the field - That will force the defenses to make a decision: either separate the safeties (leaving the middle open - which would open passing and running lanes) or leave single coverage on the other WR (which they can do with impunity now because noone can burn them - change it to a Williams who would abuse single coverage with his size or a burner and the defense has to change).

    DD is solid - but he is not a dominant RB that can have success against a defense that puts 8 in the box. Add another good WR (forcing the safeties out of the middle) and his value increases because he could take it to the house when he slips the LBs on the short screen or even a dive.

    Simply put, right now our offense does not have enough fire power. Defenses will double AJ and put single coverage on our other WR(or WRs), leaving 8 men in the box to shut down the run. Which leaves us looking at a lot of 3 and outs.
     
  16. royce1054

    royce1054 All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    900
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    HOUSTON
    Your arguement about every one double covering Andre Johnson is actually the reason why we should. Having a #2 to catch the ball when they double Johnson is a great thing. Imagine how life would be to have 2 good WR that can catch and if you double team both you have a Jabar Gaffney or a Billy Miller to catch the ball when you do.
     
  17. LikeABoss

    LikeABoss All Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    599
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    The MidWest, Ohio to be exact...
    If the Rams can have Torry Holt and Issac Bruce, the Broncos can have Ashley Lelie and Rod Smith and still have success with their passing game with no egos coming from either player, then the Texans can have Andre Johnson and Troy Williamson on the same team as well :thumbup

    Hell, Oakland just added Randy Moss to team with Jerry Porter :cool:
     
  18. Grid

    Grid Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    244
    not saying you cant have two similar WRs starting.. im saying its not necessary.
     
  19. powda

    powda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,579
    Likes Received:
    287
    i hear ya grid.......and there are ample examples of good teams without superstar recieving cores....but the bottom line is......aside from aj we had no downfield threats last year. either carr has to get much better protection ,AND the running game has to become domminant OR carr needs to have another reciever defenses have to account for.
     
  20. Grid

    Grid Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    244
    well bradford was a down field threat.. just not a good one.

    and my problem with getting another receiver is that we WANT better protection and a dominant running game.. that is the direction this team wants to move. Grabbing anothe receiver.. if he is any good, chances are we would either not resign him in a few years cause it would tie up to much money in the offense, or we would sign him and start to look like the Colts.

    we want a power running game first and foremost.. so receiver to me just seems like an unnecessary pick. at least in the high rounds. Especially when we already have the peices to put together a good starting WR set.
     

Share This Page