Town Hall Conference Call: Bob McNair

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by Wolf, Feb 2, 2011.

  1. Wolf

    Wolf 100% Texan

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    37,958
    Likes Received:
    1,702
    Location:
    Kerrville
    drs23, Mr. White and thunderkyss like this.
  2. Wolf

    Wolf 100% Texan

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    37,958
    Likes Received:
    1,702
    Location:
    Kerrville
    from the link
     
    CloakNNNdagger and Malloy like this.
  3. Malloy

    Malloy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,667
    Likes Received:
    226
    Location:
    CPH
    Nice find, thanks!

    18 scouts, wow, that seems like alot, cool nonetheless :)
     
  4. steelbtexan

    steelbtexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Messages:
    14,176
    Likes Received:
    569
    Sounds to me Gary gets his choice on picks and Rick runs the draft board.

    Of all of the hands/voices in the war room I hope Phillips carries the most weight.

    Hopefully Phillips says look Gary/Rick, BoB hired me to fix the defense and I need these 3-4 guys to do the job I was hired to do.

    Trade up or trade down,trade players already on the roster it really matter how Phillips ends up with the guys he wants. Just as long as he gets who he needs to improve this putrid defense.
     
  5. GP

    GP Go Texans!

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,573
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    So, in the span of just a few minutes....when it's our turn to pick....there's a conversation, and a show of hands on who each person wants, and then a yes or no by Rick Smith, and an answer from Rick as to why, and then Gary gets to have a rebuttal, and everyone gets a say in the matter, and the pick is made?

    That's a lot to happen in just a few minutes of time, IMO.

    I don't know, guys. Why would he reveal this information? What, in the history of this team, has ever led us to think they would openly share their process? I'm not saying the whole thing is fake, but I have doubts about key pieces of information in it.

    1. We would all "expect" that the coach gets his players, since a GM grabbing players might end up backfiring if the coach doesn't want those GM-chosen players.

    2. We would all "expect" that they prepare a draft board in the manner described. No shocker there.

    3. I just wonder how the ACTUAL pick, when it's being decided upon during our turn on the clock, is handled. The description given just seems too picture-perfect to me. "Everyone gets a chance to add their input, a show of hands is made, Rick shares his opinion, Gary his, etc., and the player is picked."

    Not nitpicking the whole thing here, but just a bit distrusting of the last part of it pertaining to making the actual pick. I guess it shows that Gary is likely to be able to pick the player he wants, when it's all said and done, and the GM is there to play devil's advocate? If so, then Rick Smith is not nearly as important on draft day as he's been made out to be by certain people here.
     
  6. steelbtexan

    steelbtexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Messages:
    14,176
    Likes Received:
    569
    Yeah, I could see the process playing out this way in the 1st rd. (What about a trade up/down scenerio) But I dont believe it works the way BoB describes it in rds 3-7. There's not enough time for the consensus war room pick.

    If I'm wrong and they do the consensus pick thing in rds 3-7. That helps explain the reason the Texans have done such a poor job of drafting.
     
  7. Texanmike02

    Texanmike02 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    8,272
    Likes Received:
    753
    So anyone who wants to know why we kept Gary?

    Mike
     
  8. drs23

    drs23 Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    4,485
    Likes Received:
    312
    Location:
    No more VIP Suite so back to the recliner
    I dunno GP. Kinda sounds like nitpicking to me. I thought McNair's explanation of how things were run in the war room was a very direct answer to questions posed by many here on numerous occasions. I think he answered the "I just wonder how the ACTUAL pick" question honestly. I personally didn't perceive any deception there. Is that what your implying?
     


  9. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    1,752
    Location:
    Texas
    Sounds to me like McNair has learned a lot about football.
     
  10. GP

    GP Go Texans!

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,573
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    One of the greatest offensive minds has got a lot of explaining to do, in terms of consistently failing to get his offense "in gear" until Quarter 4 of each game.

    One of the greatest offensive minds needs to explain why he takes the ball out of Foster's hands at crucial times at the end of games. And I don't want any of the speculative bullhonkie about how "the opposing defense was shutting the run down and Gary began exploiting the defense's secondary." Bull. Foster is arguably unstoppable right now.

    One of the greatest offensive minds kept Chris Brown & Kris Brown, with the most glaring retention being KRIS Brown who tanked it and crashed and burned at the end of the 2009 season...only to have one of the greatest offensive minds actually produce a REAL kicker's competition? He should have benched his ass and brought in Joe Street to finish out the rest of the season. Kris Brown freaking shanked an EXTRA POINT at the end of the season, for crying out loud. Then, he should have handed Rackers the job outright--No shenanigans. But the loyal-to-a-fault head coach couldn't bring himself to do it that way. There had to be the appearance of utmost gentile gamesmanship extended...because Kris was here for so long (cue the violins).

    I could go on, the point is that designing an offense and carrying it to its fullest potential are two different things entirely. Yes, Gary Kubiak has designed a good offense. Is it where it should be, after having five full years of implementing it and securing the players he wants for it? I don't think so. It ought to be starting strong and finishing strong, I'm talking about Peyton Manning-type of start-to-finish domination where we never let off the pedal and we are blowing teams out early.

    If he's one of the greatest offensive minds right now, he needs to get that offense playing consistently GREAT. I'm a hardass that way. In year 10, this team needs to do something different--Not do the same thing differently.

    If Wade's defense comes together, but the offense is still brainfarting through three quarters of football...then his legacy will be "Great designer of offenses, lousy game day coach."
     
  11. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    1,752
    Location:
    Texas
    I do agree with this. Since Kubiak came, I thought our offense would be averaging in the upper 20s... over 25 ppg. I thought our best defense would be our offense, get to an early lead, put pressure on the other team to score, take away their run game.....

    Take away the Patriots offensive efficiency, I'd like to see how many points that defense would allow.
     
  12. EllisUnit

    EllisUnit Serving Koolaid

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    380
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    This is the first season i remember our offense starting off so slow under Kubiak, i could be wrong but i never remember it being as bad as it was last season.
     
  13. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    1,752
    Location:
    Texas
    Last year, too many turnovers.

    I'm not saying what we saw in 2010 was the norm. Just saying that offense had issues.

    The defense, definitely the biggest problem. Not the only problem.
     
  14. EllisUnit

    EllisUnit Serving Koolaid

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    380
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    yeah we had issuse, but even with the same offense as last year and a D ranked in the low 20s we should be able to make a splash in the play-offs. A few good CBs, maybe a Safety and i can see our D going from dead last to atleast in the 12-18 range.
     
  15. Dishman

    Dishman Miss Ya Blue

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2009
    Messages:
    684
    Likes Received:
    42
    Location:
    Houston
    Take a look at the offensive and defensive rankings for 2009. If what you say is true then we should have already made that splash in the playoffs.
     
  16. Lucky

    Lucky Moderator

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,296
    Likes Received:
    1,481
    No kidding. It looks like the Texans indecisiveness spills over from the field into the war room. BTW, who is working the phones?

    It's not evident in the product.
     
  17. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,208
    Likes Received:
    1,437
    The year before, the Texans were commonly playing half a game, whether the D or the O. We never knew for sure who would show up which half.
     
  18. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,208
    Likes Received:
    1,437
    I wonder how proud McNair would be if he were graded on his field-related performance using similar parameters that GMs, coaches and players are graded. (........And I would have to exclude OUR Gm, coaches and players from the usual evaluation process, because it has not followed very classic system logic thus far.)
     
  19. VTexan

    VTexan The Realist

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    80
    at least andre johnson was a good pick
     
  20. ChampionTexan

    ChampionTexan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,523
    Likes Received:
    708
    Very poorly timed turnovers perhaps, but too many? We were tied for fourth fewest turnovers in the league last year with 18.

    Two of the biggest problems we had (and they're somewhat inter-related) were not forcing turnovers (we had the 4th fewest turnovers in the league and wound up at net -0- for the year), and giving a short field too often and not getting one often enough.

    The second one is partially a result of the first one, but also, a result of a below average punter, below average coverage teams, and below average return teams. Basically, with the exception of Rackers, our ST totally sucked in everything they did!

    And I agree that the offense wasn't perfect, but it was definitely superior to the other two phases of the game. We've essentially assigned Wade the job of fixing the Defense, and hopefully via draft and free agency (when and if there is free agency) will give him the resources he needs to do so. I'm still waiting to find out why I'm even supposed to think the special teams are going to get better.

    I hope we replace Turk, and get coach Joe to show us last year was an aberration, and not a signal that he's losing his touch.
     

Share This Page