Todd Wade

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by tacoman_j, Mar 16, 2005.

  1. tacoman_j

    tacoman_j Veteran

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey, Vinny, you seem to be knowledgeable about line play. Therefore, could you see Todd Wade @ left tackle. He is well compensated. I don't access to Texans' games, but was Wand really poor last year, or is he better suited for RT.

    houstonprofootball.com
     
  2. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    To me, he is a pure RT although he seems to have good feet. I was told we may look at Wade at LT a bit in camp, and I was chatting with Keith the other day (privately) and he said he was told the same thing and we had two different sources that each told us this at different times so I guess it is likely true. I would not read too much into it though. If they take a look, it will probably be a short one imo. I think Wand still has good potential but after talking to a few folks I'm not sure he is going to stick at LT long term. He may also be a better RT than LT.
     
  3. outofhnd

    outofhnd All Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Messages:
    723
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    He has excellent feet but I don't think he can make the neccesary adjustments needed to be a great LT. But its always worth a look
     
  4. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    I appreciate Cass & crew going after OP like they did, but up until then they had me convinced that Seth Wand was their long term plan at LT. Now I realize that was a smoke screen and they have profound reservations about
    his abilities to fill that all important position. It also makes me think that they
    are far more likely to take a tackle with their first pick than they led on before. They may not see a potential Pace or Bosseli amoung this years college group, but they may see a player(s) that would be a substantial upgrade over Wand. Which leads me arounde to the subject of this thread -
    yea, I expect them to try Todd Wade at LT because we now know they aren't satisfied with what they've got there now.
     
  5. keyfro

    keyfro Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,859
    Likes Received:
    37
    you know i could see us drafting alex barron...i've said that for awhile now...but instead of putting him at LT his first season we could move wade over to LT for a season and have barron play RT to get used to tackle play in the nfl...remember at florida state barron was the rotating tackle on the open side...meaning he rarely had tight end help...giving him a year with TE help might be very good for him as he gets used to the speed of the nfl...and of course there is no saying we can switch him and wade half-way throughout the season
     
  6. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,638
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Wand is going to show marked improvement this season as will Chester Pitts at LG. Concern about the left side of our line is understandable after last season but it's going to be ok with or without adding Barron/moving Wade.

    I kind of don't think that Barron will be there at 13 anyway.
     
  7. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    For the record....I think Wand will end up starting at LT next season regardless. For all I know Wade is just getting back up reps. I'm not down on Wand myself and think that he had a pretty solid year last year and is going to get better with experience. My post above was just passing on a bit of cryptic information that I have gotten.
     
  8. ArlingtonTexan

    ArlingtonTexan Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,160
    Likes Received:
    465
    While Wade is a better run blocker at this point in thier careers, I see Wade and Wand is very similiar players. they have very good feet for a right tackle, but only average to ok for a LT. I think either long term on the left side equals a guy who is adequate to good, but could always use an upgrade.
     


  9. outofhnd

    outofhnd All Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Messages:
    723
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Keep in mind we did kinda rush things with Wand because Pitts was getting holding calls left and right. Pitts did a good job at LT but he has a hard time positioning his hands and usually gets outside the numbers. With Wand we had fewer holding calls fewer breakdowns he just needs to learn how to handle speed rushers. I think Wand and Peek will see plenty of each other during camp as they may try to quicken his feet. Not to mention we don't know how he is doing in the filmroom and on the practice field. Who knows we might see an improvement. It just may be the learning curve we put Wand on especially in a new scheme in which ALL of the O Line had problems I think the consesnus is that the time it would take to get him to perform better may be longer than 1 or 2 seasons. Wade will be a trial run but prolly not much if any improvment
     
  10. TexansTrueFan

    TexansTrueFan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    2,600
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Huntsville Tx
    although i thought he didnt do TO terrible last season i still feel we could really use an up grade. But i feel they will improve as a unit by next season !
     
  11. scourge

    scourge Digression King

    Joined:
    May 2, 2004
    Messages:
    1,735
    Likes Received:
    132
    Location:
    The Liveable Forest
    unless someone trades up to get him, I doubt he'll be off the board by the time we pick at #13... having said that, I honestly dont see us drafting him unless he truly is the bpa at the time. I'm still say that we will be drafting either a LB, CB, or WR with the first pick.
     

Share This Page