The Texans are taking "tha Eraser"?!

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by Imatexanfan, Jan 10, 2007.

  1. Imatexanfan

    Imatexanfan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    47
    Location:
    Ft.Knox, KY
    With the Texans season over, everyones attention has gone to free agency and the draft. The consensus, it seems, in this draft and offseason is to address the S, CB, OL, DL First. Lets face it, those are our most glaring needs.:shades:

    Almost every person has us taking LaRon Landry with the 8th pick in the upcoming draft. No one says anything about Reggie Nelson.

    LaRon didn't impress me at all in the Sugar Bowl against an obvious weaker opponent. He is big, and can lay the wood, but his coverage is suspect. Someone on this board said he is good at everything, but not great in anything.

    Look at Reggie Nelson, aka the Eraser. This kid is a ballhawk, can intimidate people, lay wood, cover, and block punts. The safeties for Florida combined for 14 interceptions this season! 14! Nelson has better speed, and is taller but not as built as Landry. I will be willing to trade better coverage skills over build any day, plus Nelson has plenty of time to bulk up if need be. I think he is the closest to being the next Brian Dawkins, and you cant deny how a premier safety can change games and even seasons, as in the case of the Eagles this season.

    Dont get me wrong, I would like to see us draft one of these guys in the first, and finish building this defense. The Texans could be the next sleeping giant that no one is excited to play against. See Bears and Ravens.


    :secret: Here is a few clips on the Eraser doing the darn thing. Check it out.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Zw7nxl4qa4

    With that being said, I wouldn't be opposed to DL or OL in the second either. Okoye, Pittcock, Ryan Kalil, even an outside linebacker to compliment Ryans.

    There are many holes and many options through Free agency and the draft. Nelson is the best 8th overall pick in my opinion. But, thats what makes it such a great debate, but this team WILL be better! :yahoo:
     
  2. texan767

    texan767 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sugar Land
    Wow!
    I looks like he lays it to 'em!
     
  3. Imatexanfan

    Imatexanfan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    47
    Location:
    Ft.Knox, KY
    OH YEA! Its like another Dunta on the Def-Secondary that can bring the hat!
     
  4. Ole Miss Texan

    Ole Miss Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    8,696
    Likes Received:
    685
    I think we should draft him so He can teach Carr how to hit and tackle like that...David could of used that last season.
     
  5. jdog

    jdog All Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    838
    Likes Received:
    48
    Looks good. Nelson and McCauley!
     
  6. Ole Miss Texan

    Ole Miss Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    8,696
    Likes Received:
    685
    I would be pleased...very pleased.
     
  7. coachdent

    coachdent Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    443
    Likes Received:
    85
    Location:
    Media, PA
    A couple of things...

    Not all of the mock drafts have us taking Landry. In fact, I have seen very few. Many that I have seen have us taking Peterson

    http://www.footballsfuture.com/2007/nflmockdraft.html
    http://www.fftoolbox.com/nfl_draft/2007/mockdraft_thompson.cfm
    http://www.nfldraftforecast.com/mock/coyne/round1.shtml
    http://nfldaily.com/2007_nfl_draft_predictions.htm

    A couple of sites even have us moving up for Peterson. I don't think so. I would love to have him, but the track record of the Denver lineage is not to draft running backs high. Tough to pass on an explosive back like a Peterson or a Lynch and I personally would grab either of those guys, but it is a philosophy not held by our franchise.

    Most of the places I have seen have Landry ahead of the Eraser. Some places even have him going in the 18-22 range. Landry obviously was not incredible in bowl game. But this sucker can hit a little bit too:

    Exhibit A
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvKaO78Ov2I

    Good Lawd! :yahoo:

    I wish it were June...actually March / April because that's when free agency hits and hopefully we'll see some exciting future Texans arrive!
     
  8. Keldar

    Keldar Veteran

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    9
    Looks like a great player.......but, but.....

    .....he has that hair thing goin' on.:joker:
     


  9. NRowl

    NRowl Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2005
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    2
    He is a good player but I would prefer Landry. I don't like the way Nelson tackles with his shoulder; he doesn't wrap up too often.
     
  10. Grid

    Grid Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    244
    People were saying that DeMeco was a guy that was good at everything but great at nothing too.

    Im still interested in Landry.
     
  11. Yankee_In_TX

    Yankee_In_TX Dance Lindsay!

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    12,448
    Likes Received:
    444
    Location:
    Houston, 77008
    Kudos on being about the first person to not talk about how we're taking a QB or RB first :)
     
  12. Mr teX

    Mr teX Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,202
    Likes Received:
    481
    Location:
    Everyone Wants The Throne
    Ding Ding, we have a winner. He also gambles too much for my liking, that video didn't do anything but reaffirm that for me. Landry is a more controlled & solid tackler IMO still a great athlete though & i'm sure he'll make the team who drafts him much better than they were before in the secondary. I think the moniker of "the Eraser" fits Landry better.
     
  13. Tayton

    Tayton Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    2
    I saw the highlight reels on Nelson and was pretty impressed. I also watched as closley as possible in the BCS and was unable to really see anything. They kept saying that the DBs were doing a good job of covering, so I assume it was due in a big part to Nelson. If you look at the 2 Ohio State scores Nelson took absolutely HORRIBLE tackling angles on Ginn and Pittman. That scared me.
     
  14. Roughnecks

    Roughnecks Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Lumberton Texas
    On that last site they had Russell from LSU going in the #9 pick. For myself I like Carr but if Russell falls down to us at 8 which I do not but if he does they need to take him.
     
  15. eriadoc

    eriadoc Texan-American

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    19,259
    Likes Received:
    1,995
    If we can't figure out a way to land a top OT, I'm hoping for Leon Hall, CB from Michigan. It's more likely we can find a quality safety in Rounds 2-3-4 than it is for a cornerback.
     
  16. TEXANS84

    TEXANS84 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,480
    Likes Received:
    365
    Location:
    The Woodlands, TX
    He's a great player.

    I believe he lost his mother last week prior to the championship game. He's got fire and plays with emotion...something that we see with Dunta. I'd be all for him if we don't get Peterson.
     
  17. MrTexan Slim

    MrTexan Slim Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    1
  18. dwilt72

    dwilt72 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    2
    Unfortunately that seems to be the way the NFL is going. It seems like fewer and fewer players wrap up. They are going for the highlight-reel hits rather than wrapping up and making a good solid tackle. Truthfully, I'm more worried about coverage skills from the FS than I am with tackling. I haven't dug into the the draft enough yet, but I HOPE we can find a safety that can get us a few INTS!
     
  19. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    12,988
    Likes Received:
    548
    if your gonna use the #8 pick on a FS he better be able to both cover & tackle :)
     
  20. htownfoozball

    htownfoozball Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    379
    Likes Received:
    5
    laron didnt do a whole lot in the bowl game, but neither did nelson. some may argue, well troy had a crappy game because his receivers were covered by the DB's, well same can be said about quinn's sucky game as well.

    bottom line is, landry is more polished all around than nelson and is the safe pick. the scheme he plays in doesn't allow him to roam all over the place like nelson to make plays. you have to watch film on him from his earlier years. laron can do a multitude of things, and you must take advantage of every facet of his game, but i think reggie is at his best when used solely in coverage. laron is the better value because he provides more on the field in terms of what he can do. his blitzing skills and ability to defend the run are unquestioned. his coverage skills are underrated because of the scheme he plays in, like i stated earlier.

    1 guy i'm intrigued with is roderick rogers from wisconin. 6'1 185lbs with 4.45 speed. inexperienced, but a playmaker. should be around in the 3rd or 4th.

    michael johnson is another safety that would be a good value pick in the 3rd or 4th. good instincts, can make plays, physical, sure tackler. alot of intangibles with this kid. reminds me of demeco in that the only thing he lacks is timed speed. runs 4.55 40yd
     

Share This Page