The same problem... Scoring points

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by hollywood_texan, Sep 26, 2006.

  1. hollywood_texan

    hollywood_texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    213
    The first four seasons, the Texans averaged 16.20 points per game.

    Here is the break down by year,

    2002 13.31
    2003 15.94
    2004 19.31
    2005 16.25

    So far in 2006, 16.33 points per game.

    With all the changes on offense, including how horrible the defense is, the offense should be able to average 25 points per game at the back end of the season.

    Is this too much to ask?

    I think scoring points could help Kubiak the most, even as horrible as the defense is.
     
  2. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    54,089
    Likes Received:
    2,475
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    We have a grand total of 3 punts forced in 3 games. Until the D steps up to the plate, nothing the offense does matters. Yes the O needs to improve as well, but it has to a degree as opposed to the D which has gone from bad to monumentally bad.
     
  3. hollywood_texan

    hollywood_texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    213
    I am not talking about winning games, I am talking about making things look a little better.

    Agreed though, the defense has to play better. Actually, those guys are a joke!

    But, it isn't interesting that our defense was decent a few years back and yet the offense still had problems scoring. It is still a problem and I don't see how it would be different if the defense held teams to less than 25 points in the first three games. Of course, I am taking into consideration the coaching additions, Kubiak and Sherman, then also take into account the additions of Moulds, Putzier, and Flanagen. That is really my point, so much change and still the same problem. The offense isn't really close, and they actually look worse than last year.

    Also, even though the defense is a joke, the other teams are kicking off to give us possession after they score, and still nothing happens on offense. The offense is still getting the same amount of possessions if the defense had stopped them. Granted, they are starting on about their own 20.

    With all the changes, the offense still seems to be the same.
     
  4. Grid

    Grid Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    244
    You should go look at the time of possession average for each year.. that might give a better indication.

    I havent seen the numbers but it seems to me that our offense is doing just fine being at 16 points per game when thier opponent is on the field twice as long as them.

    Our defense is the biggest issue.. on both sides of the ball.
     
  5. ronaldod1

    ronaldod1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    5
    the offensive line isn't any better. The player and coaching personnel additions have enabled the team to make adjustments necessary to marginally combat this huge deficiency, but it's still a major problem. The Texans have never 'owned' the field on offense OR on Defense. That all starts in the trenches. coaching changes and shiny new free agent recievers can't fix the core problem of the team. It's a process. It's gonna take the development of spencer and winston with a legit free agent pickup next year to really make a difference. then i think 25 per game is a little more realistic.
     
  6. Grid

    Grid Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    244
    Oline is alot better. Run blocking isnt there but Carr has had time in the pocket.
     
  7. TK_Gamer

    TK_Gamer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    32
    sorry but when the offense is so far behind they are forced to throw the ball all the time you will never win. as far as the team looking better, I doubt it, the word will still be the texans cant win or the texans are the worst team in the league. you cant even accurately judge an offense that plays constantly from behind. the defense you can judge, because they CAUSED the team to be behind. the normal NFL team scores on about 30% of its drives. against the texans they score on over 50% of their drives. it makes a big difference. washington and indy not only scored. they did it on long time consuming drives that kept our lousy coached defense on the field longer and our improving offense OFF the field.
     
  8. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Some teams with rotten defenses have won high scoring shoot outs over the years....I'm still waiting to win our share.
     
  9. hollywood_texan

    hollywood_texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    213
    I understand the point about our defense, but our offense isn't getting fewer possessions or chances to move the ball because of the poor defense. The other team is still kicking off after they score. The field position is an issue, I totally understand that.

    What if the offense popped off one long drive themselves during the second or third quarter every game.

    Is that too much to ask?

    It seems like we have lowered our expectations on offense because the defense is a joke.
     
  10. HomeBred_Texan

    HomeBred_Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    32
    I would love it if we could do a high scoring shoot out...

    Win or lose, it would at least be exciting...
     
  11. TK_Gamer

    TK_Gamer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    32
    it's called time of possesion and comfort level. the other team is under little pressure (our poor defense /playcalling) our team is getting blitzed every other play. so they convert their 3rd downs and consume 4 to 8 minutes and we go 1 min and a half and give it back to them. they dont need as many chances as we do cuz they score on their drives when we dont. then it just snow balls late in the game when we HAVE to throw the ball to catch up and they can run the ball and drain the clock. thats why you dont want to ever get behind by more than 2 scores. because the other team is under no pressure and you are. as far as expectations. i think if we didnt give up 20 points and 25 mins of possession, our offense would be looking at least adequate.
     
  12. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Last year was the opposite and we expected the defense to win some games here and there. We didn't roll out too many excuses for them I don't think.
     
  13. Texan1

    Texan1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    3
    Not a Mario bash - but this is why I felt this was the year to take Bush. The extra dimension on O would have been a huge plus and would have least made this team interesting to watch through the inevitable rebuilding period ahead.

    The D was at least a couple of years away from being respectable – Mario or no Mario.

    So why cry? We didn’t draft Bush and it is over and done with. Now we (Texans included) all suffer the painful rebuilding process…
     
  14. Texans_Chick

    Texans_Chick Utopian Dreamer

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    7,273
    Likes Received:
    1,056
    Last year, statistically the defense was worse than the offense.

    This year, statistically, the defense is worse than the offense, but is also so much worse than the rest of the league by a huge margin.
     
  15. Titan "Tack" Fan

    Titan "Tack" Fan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,514
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    Ca$hville
    Man i can't wait until:

    The Toilet Bowl!

    October 29, 2006
    Nashville, TN
    Titans vs. Texans


    and an encore performance
    December 10, 2006
    Houston, TX
    Titans vs. Texans


    Atleast we have something to look forward to..
     
  16. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    they were long term but that offense was historically bad. We didn't have a lead till the Browns game....for one second....not one lead (if I remember correctly). Look up what week we played the Browns.
     
  17. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    54,089
    Likes Received:
    2,475
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Find me a team that won games averaging one forced punt per game. What you are saying is true for bad D's with great O's not historically, monumentally, of epic proportion bad D's with a mediocre at best O. Simple equation--let the other guy score every time they get the ball and the best you can hope for is a tie. No doubt the O needs work--no doubt the D needs more.
     
  18. hollywood_texan

    hollywood_texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    213
    What about the offense and defensive stats for 2004?

    The defense played pretty well that year as I remember and the Texans lost a lot of close games.

    It seems from this thread, there are lot people that think we can't win games unless the defense holds teams to under 20 points and the offense has a time of possession of more than 30 minutes.

    If so, I think it kind of proves my point. The offense needs the defense to get it more chances, and the offense has a problem taking advantage of their chances after a kickoff and starting at the 20.
     
  19. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    ok, so a shoot-out is asking too much.
     
  20. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    54,089
    Likes Received:
    2,475
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Hey--I would much prefer us to put up 40 and lose than put up 20 and lose but we aren't going to win until the D looks better than the HS D down the street. It does zero good for the O to put 7 on the board if the D let's the opposing O put 7 on and chew up 8 minutes of clock or lets them score 7 in 52 seconds. Yes the O needs improvement--fine call them a bad O but that makes the D a travesty, a mockery, a friggin joke even in comparison to a bad O.
     

Share This Page