The play

[Thorn]

de play, de play boss!!!!

 

[ObsiWan]

This part make no sense...

Also, a loophole in the rules allowed a team took an intentional foul to buy extra time for a replay challenge — either for their own coach or the replay official. Mike Pereira, who was then the vice president of officiating, said in 2009 it would be legal to do so. Any penalty which prevented the snap from happening kept the previous play available for review, including intentional encroachment penalties to stop a hurry-up offense or delay of game penalties by the offense. The Competition Committee closed that loophole by declaring a team may not benefit from a challenge when a team has committed a foul to delay the next snap.

So those are considered "between snaps plays"??
How??

 

[CloakNNNdagger]

This part make no sense...

Any penalty which prevented the snap from happening kept the previous play available for review, including intentional encroachment penalties to stop a hurry-up offense (for the benefit of the defense)...... or intentional delay of game penalties by the offense (for the benefit of the offense). (rewritten for clarity)

So those are considered "between snaps plays"??
How??

Both penalties would occur between the last snap and the anticipated subsequent snap............i.e., "between snap plays."

 

[infantrycak]

From PFT.com

Cardinals coach Ken Whisenhunt, who benefited six days ago from the rule that wipes out replay review if a coach asks for one when one is automatic, explained on Friday that coaches are reminded before every game to not throw the red flag after touchdowns or turnovers.

“They make a point of telling you before the game, on turnovers and scoring plays, you can’t throw the flag,” Whisenhunt said, via Kent Somers of the Arizona Republic.

And any vestige of sympathy just left the building.