The Dream Mock thread

Discussion in 'Mock Draft Talk' started by otisbean, Feb 28, 2012.

  1. otisbean

    otisbean All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Just having a little fun here. Post your ideal draft for the Texans, not who you think they'll take but who you'd really like to see in a Texans uniform. Pretend for just a moment that the stars align perfectly for us for once. Just don't get too crazy, like RG3 or Blackman in rd 1 or giving us sure fire 1st rd picks in later rounds.

    Rd 1 Michael Floyd WR

    I doubt he makes to us but as a long time ND fan I really like this guy's game. He's a terrific football player. Great hands, good speed, willing blocker in the running game, and has played in a pro style offense. Not a great season this year due to very spotty QB play, but this guy would be terrific as a WR2 with AJ

    Rd 2 Vinny Curry OLB

    I thought this guy would be a late first or early second rounders but with a slower than expected 40 time, he may indeed fall to us in rd 2. He would make a terrific addition to our OLB rotation. Remember 40 time isn't everything, Suggs ran a very pedestrian 40 but has obviously been very productive.

    Rd 3 Mike Martin NT

    I just like this guy, tough, athletic, strong and physical. He would make a great addition to our NT rotation and allow Mitchell to move out to DE bolstering our depth their as well.

    Rd 4 Janzen Jackson DB

    Ultra athletic DB to add to this mix

    Rd 5

    Philip Blake or David Molk OC

    young center to groom.

    Rd 6

    Devon Wylie Wr

    Quick slot receiver and return man

    Rd 7

    Chase Ford TE

    Come on, it's the Texas, we've got to pick at least 1 TE.
     
    WolverineFan likes this.
  2. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,562
    Likes Received:
    993
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    I'm concerned if Floyd has corrected the drinking issue. One of the ESPN guys@ combine stated Floyd had "handled his business on and off field". I don't see a DB and would go WR in 4th ideally as at least 2 guys there I want. Blake in 5th violates your parameters imo as he is a 3rd minimum (listed #5 G/C per Mayock).

    Enjoyed the mock
     
  3. otisbean

    otisbean All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    I think Floyd has cleaned himself up. I was looking at nfldraftscout.com for rankings. We might not go DB, he's just a really good athlete and I think we need some S depth. Taylor form LSU might be interesting in the 4th or 5th, we could also easily flip flop 4 and 5 and go interior OL in 4 and a solid S for depth in 5
     
  4. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,562
    Likes Received:
    993
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    We really need a OG. I mocked Lonnie Edwards in 3rd as a true left guard.
     
  5. otisbean

    otisbean All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    I agree we need some depth at OG, to be honest Im not super familiar with the interior OL in the draft outside the top5-6 guys.
     
  6. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,562
    Likes Received:
    993
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    Decastro is the best and he and Konz should be gone although some have Konz available. I like Zeitler from Wisconsin (Beerlover turned me on to him some time ago) but he is a second round that may also be gone by #58.
     
  7. rmartin65

    rmartin65 I'm Score

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    7,999
    Likes Received:
    447
    I think Konz may be there at 26. And if that is the case, he should garner heavy consideration.
     
  8. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,562
    Likes Received:
    993
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    if he could play OG also that would be useful and worth #26. Go WR 2nd & 4th and NT in 3rd. Do you agree that Phillip Blake will be a 3rd round?
     


  9. rmartin65

    rmartin65 I'm Score

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    7,999
    Likes Received:
    447
    The mock I am currently working on has Konz in the first, a NT in the second, a WR in the 3rd. That is where I am at now.

    I could see Blake being there in the third. He did not have a great showing, but it was not bad. Late 3rd is within the range he could go.
     
  10. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    12,984
    Likes Received:
    548
    I haven't been keeping up, is Myers pretty much gone because they want to keep Mario?
     
  11. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,562
    Likes Received:
    993
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    Really like Blake after watching him so much. Depending on whom you select in third as WR I could go with you. If you remember from our early mock discussion, I expected Konz to go way before us. I do think Myers will be with us and therefore would prefer a lower round for C/G
     
  12. TimeKiller

    TimeKiller Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,648
    Likes Received:
    548
    Location:
    This giant tree, standing 10,000 ft. high but not
    1 Andrew Luck, QB
    2 Michael Floyd, WR
    3 Peter Konz, C
    4 Kevin Zietler, OG
    5 Kendall Wright, WR
    6 Quentin Coples, DE
    7 Blake Griffin, TE
     
  13. steelbtexan

    steelbtexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Messages:
    14,176
    Likes Received:
    569
    Does it bother draftniks that Kontz has missed 6-7 games in the last 2 yrs?

    Or that Kontz only lifted 18 reps at the combine?

    It surely made me pause. I had him as a 10 yr probowler. Now not so much. But Strength is the one thing that can easily be improved upon. Given Kontz work ethic getting stronger shouldn't be a problem.
     
  14. bah007

    bah007 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    9,529
    Likes Received:
    495
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    Because of the bench press reps?
     
  15. steelbtexan

    steelbtexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Messages:
    14,176
    Likes Received:
    569
    Not really,

    Because of his work ethic.

    But it did suprise me.

    But the injury history bothers me more.
     
  16. bah007

    bah007 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    9,529
    Likes Received:
    495
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    I agree. I put zero stock in bench press reps unless we're talking about a guy who can't hardly throw it up at all.

    There are guys who throw up 35 reps but can't block a soul. And then you have guys who throw up 20 and end up as All Pros.

    The only thing X number of reps on 225 tells me is how many times a guy can bench 225. It tells me nothing about his ability to play football.

    I understand that people want to see a test for strength at the combine but repping out on bench press isn't a test of functional football strength.
     
  17. Corrosion

    Corrosion Idealist

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    33,215
    Likes Received:
    1,408
    Location:
    Northwest Houston
    Its quite possible Zietler goes late in the first round ..... Pittsburgh or New England maybe. Both desperately need to upgrade their OL toprotect those milti-million dollar QB's.
     
  18. Insideop

    Insideop Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,823
    Likes Received:
    94
    Location:
    In the "Control Room"
    It's suppose to show if a college player is dedicated to staying in good condition (strength) or if he was not so dedicated in the weight room. True, it doesn't show how good a football player he is, but it speaks more to his discipline as a player. As an example, no one can question Cushing's discipline because of his dedication in the weight room and his intense workouts. They knew he could play football by watching his tapes. The bench press is just another tool to find out what kind of person you're drafting.
     
  19. bah007

    bah007 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    9,529
    Likes Received:
    495
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    I know a lot of people buy into that but I don't. Now, if we're talking about a guy that does significantly less reps than the other players at his position then I agree we have a problem. But moving guys down your board because they did 5 or so less reps than someone else? That's crazy.

    Once you start getting to 15+ reps you are not even testing muscular strength anymore anyway, you are testing muscular endurance.

    Football is a fast twitch sport, and benching for reps recruits your slow twitch muscle fibers. So I would say it has very little to do with anything, unless like I mentioned, if a guy is significantly behind his peers.
     
  20. otisbean

    otisbean All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    I've been a strength coach for over 16 years, I hate the 225 test. There's a story about a bodybuilder and powerlifter having a squat contest. The PL squatted over 900lbs while the BB put up 800 (for the record the PL was the first man to squat over 1,000 in competition so 900 wan't a max). Then they put on 625 to see who could perform the most reps, the PL hit 12-15 and the BB hit 25. If you just look at their 625 numbers you would think the BB was the stronger of the 2, but in reality the PL is WAAAY stronger. It's the same thing with the 225 test. The theory is the stronger guy will bench 225 more times, but you need to factor in limb length and the athlete's genetic make up (fast twitch vs slow twitch ect..). Truth is you can't serve two masters. You can be good at reps or you can be good at a max output, but not both, they're too dissimilar.

    There are so many cool aspects of the combine, but there are a bunch of things that I would love to see changed - a fully electronically timed 40, a better upper body strength/power evaluation, more position specific drills ect..
     
    Last edited: Feb 29, 2012

Share This Page