Texans will draft a RB in the 1st or 2nd

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by Polo, Mar 30, 2009.

  1. Polo

    Polo Guest

    I'm pretty convinced about that at this point, though my mind could change.

    Based on some things that Kubiak has said, and how this team has acted in the past I don't see us escaping the first day without the second half of our RB duo in place.

    -Kubiak says that he was pleasantly surprised that Slaton held up for as many games as he did and that he doesn't believe that Steve can be counted on to have that kind of iron man season every year.

    -Kubes says he needs another starting caliber back

    -Supposedly, Kubes wanted to trade up for Deangelo Williams the year we got Demeco

    -We have not signed any veteran RB's in free agency

    -Most other position have somewhat reliable depth

    -Our biggest off-season additions so far have come on the defensive side of the ball; They said they wanted to improve that area of the defense and the first thing they did was fire the coach. They may feel like that alone makes us a much better unit. Greenwood and Weaver are no longer here. Assuming Antonio Smith is alive he should be better than Weaver, and Adibi as a rookie helped spark our defense more than Greenwood did in his entire tenure.


    If we roll into the draft as is, I don't see our front office not placing another RB as a priority considering how much importance we've placed on that position in the past and our lack of reliable threats currently on the roster. Of course my mind changes all the time, but right now this is what I'm currently feeling. Thoughts ?
     
    Texan Asylum likes this.
  2. HOU-TEX

    HOU-TEX Ah, Football!

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    16,137
    Likes Received:
    1,089
    Location:
    P-land
    Nope, 3rd round or later. :cool:
     
  3. Maddict5

    Maddict5 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,477
    Likes Received:
    315
    yeah i think rashad jennings or andre brown in the 3rd/4th looks pretty likely. if wells, donald brown, green or mccoy slip to 48 then maybe
     
  4. will742

    will742 Nukkkk

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Cypress
    Andre Brown in the 3rd sounds about right.
     
  5. Polo

    Polo Guest

    If the Texans are serious about making their play-off push this year I think the likelihood of that happening as of right now is low.

    Last year when we took Slaton in the third we had Ahman Green, Chris Taylor, Darius Walker and Chris Brown. I don't think that their intention was to rely on Slaton who was a third round pick.

    We don't have all those bodies and vets who we know can atleast play on the proffesional level. I don't see how they could feel confident about any third round or later pick coming in and being 1b. Though it sounds good in theory, I just don't see that.
     
  6. HoustonFrog

    HoustonFrog Dallas Frog

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    12,421
    Likes Received:
    785
    Location:
    Dallas
  7. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,563
    Likes Received:
    2,348
    I agree with HOU-TEX. I don't see a RB before the 3rd. I'm still wondering if we're going to try and grab a Denver cast off or surplus player with a late round pick. It seems like we'd have NFL film on those guys and that Kubiak could find out anything he wanted to know about them via the Shanny connection. Slaton's backup could come out of that pack and I'd be happy.
     
  8. ChrisG

    ChrisG Road Fan

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,945
    Likes Received:
    83
    Location:
    New York State
    i hope we do draft an rb 1st round just to stop these threads from popping up every year lol
     


  9. Polo

    Polo Guest

    I think that going after Benson when we went after Benson says a lot about the Texans view of the RB position. They don't want to take flyers on guys there when it comes to being an intergal part of the offense. They seem to want guys that have proven they could play in this leauge at a high level.

    We could have gotten Benson before he went to the Bengals (during the season when we really didn't have anyone besides Steve), but they didn't really show major interest until after he went to Cincy and had some success...

    I just don't see the Texans waiting too long to get that combo sured up when in the past they've shown that they want realiability there. Had we gotten Benson then I would have said we would get a back in the 4th or later...but without any other backs on the roster I'm not seeing it...

    The Denver cast-offs are a possibility, but right now I just gotta process the info I'm given...and right now we are scarily thin there...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 30, 2009
  10. HOU-TEX

    HOU-TEX Ah, Football!

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    16,137
    Likes Received:
    1,089
    Location:
    P-land
    True, there's still a lot of FA acquisitions to be had as well. The Texans will bring in several more FA's and UDFA's before camp.

    As far as the comment above about needing to draft a RB on the first day to be serious about the playoffs this season-------> :spit:
     
  11. TimeKiller

    TimeKiller Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,648
    Likes Received:
    548
    Location:
    This giant tree, standing 10,000 ft. high but not
    1st round...no, I just can't see them doing it. 2nd-7th okay and I think we may get out of there with 2 picks at RB but I honestly can't imagine them being any higher than 3rd rounders. 2nd as long as it's not Green.
     
  12. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    I see almost zero chance we draft a back before the 3rd round myself. Not only am I tired of seeing a rotten defense, I think the team is a bit tired of having to score 30 points to win a game also.
     
    rarazz00 likes this.
  13. pbat488

    pbat488 gig 'em

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,444
    Likes Received:
    271
    Location:
    77098
    I just think given the zone-blocking system that we run, that it isn't a necessity to draft a back in the first two rounds. Sure, a highly skilled back that could excel in our system could be the next Clinton Portis (or Steve Slaton hopefully!), but what Denver proved is it doesn't depend so much on the player as it does on the system. With that said, I think it much more likely to focus the first two picks on the defensive side of the ball, and then in the 3rd or later go for a solid RB with good vision and football IQ, and hope he pans out like SS did for us last year.
     
  14. 76Texan

    76Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Messages:
    13,583
    Likes Received:
    528
    They let Reggie Bush re-enter the draft? :stirpot:
     
  15. disaacks3

    disaacks3 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,290
    Likes Received:
    911
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    I'm with the pack on this one...drafting an RB prior to the 3rd is almost sacriligious for the ZBS scheme.
     
  16. Polo

    Polo Guest

    I think it's terribly funny that anyone thinks that adding a 3rd round pick to our backfield will amount to much. Especially when Slaton wasn't supposed to be anything more than a reliever, change of pace, 3rd down back, returner...

    I doubt the Texans have as much faith in third round picks becoming starter caliber RB's as most of you guys.
     
  17. HoustonFrog

    HoustonFrog Dallas Frog

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    12,421
    Likes Received:
    785
    Location:
    Dallas
    As the guy had in the above mock I can see maybe a 2nd rounder if the right guy is there but I think they can get their guy with Gartrell Johnson in the mid to later rounds.
     
  18. Polo

    Polo Guest

    I think the 1b running back is too important to simply "hope" he pans out.

    And I think that any RB will do in the ZBS is way overrated and Kubiak and Co. haven't even demonstrated that they feel this way in any shape or form so I'm not sure why it keeps getting repeated as if it's fact...

    I don't see how anyone could still feel this way after we paid so much for Ahman and also brought in Chris Brown to be his back-up....Not sure why anyone thinks the Texans are going to hand the keys to late round picks when they've always seemed to have wanted to avoid that...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 30, 2009
  19. Tailgate

    Tailgate Fall of Hame

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    3,178
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Houston, TX - Born and raised
    I think most would agree a trade back in the first would be ideal if we could still land a Matthews. Now if that does happen, I think an extra pick in the draft could enable us to possibly look at a RB in the second if they are in love with a guy. Thats the only way I see it going down as of now.
     
  20. Texecutioner

    Texecutioner Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,320
    Likes Received:
    1,018
    Great points in this thread Polo and I agree with just about everything you have said. I find it funny as well at how cocky some posters on this board have gotten with our running game just because we have Slaton and he worked out for us. NOt a lot of people around the league and experts expected Slaton to be that great in the NFL. Like GP pointed out in another thread in that Slaton was like Kubiak's last quarter in a slot machine. Lol! I thought that was a great analogy. People seem to foget how bad this offense was under Kubiak's philosophy of wanting to constantly pound the ball and you don't even have a good RB to do it. If we don't have a good running game next season we'll go nowhere.

    What if Slaton gets hurt for a significant amount of time? Our offense will drop off a lot. The biggest reason why our offense was able to go up and down the field a lot more last season was because of the improved running attack from Slaton. In Kubiak's first two seasons our rushing game was awful behind his arrogance of the ZBS. He wasn't able to implement all of that well with those horrible backs we had and we suffered because of it. Last year we suffered from the red zone woes as well, and a stronger bruising back is pretty essential in short yardage situations. It's good to have both, and with the way that RB's get hurt so easily now days, you want to have two productive ones.

    At first I wanted our first few picks to be mainly defense, but I think Wells would make our offense extremely dynamic and we could do so much with him and Slaton paired together. I also wouldn't mind getting Shonn Greene with a traded down first round pick or a second round pick but I doubt he'll be there with our 2nd rounder.
     

Share This Page