Texans look to build on team image in NFL Draft (McClain article)

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by beerlover, Apr 13, 2008.

  1. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    12,970
    Likes Received:
    547
  2. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,111
    Likes Received:
    1,388

    You can't ascertain the important elements of of a player without having a legitimate reference of time to draw from. I doubt that the Texans will entertain a one-year junior wonder when choosing in this draft especially since our picks are limited, and our demands immediate.
     
  3. steelbtexan

    steelbtexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Messages:
    14,022
    Likes Received:
    562
    C-N-D

    I'm in total agreement with you.

    It's a great feeling to know that this regime is in charge as opposed to the CC regime.

    They know what their looking forin a player.

    Players that treat playing in the NFL as a privilege rather than a right.

    I think that they will find two guys who will be upper level starters on this team. ( Mario, Demeco)

    They will also find two mid level starters. (Owen Daniels)

    If we can add 4 starters each draft we will be a solid playoff team for many years.

    GO SMITHIAK
     
  4. Revolution

    Revolution All Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2005
    Messages:
    883
    Likes Received:
    71
    I would not mind another DE, but I am hoping for a Left Tackle or Cornerback.

    On another note: Probably in the wrong thread, but couldn't help but get a Miss Teen South Carolina vibe here:

    If a prospect like such as Florida's Derrick Harvey and Clemson's Phillip Merling are is available, the Texans might be tempted to draft a defensive lineman in the first round for the fifth time.

    :rofl: :fridge:

    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/sports/5696586.html
     
  5. TexanSam

    TexanSam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    17,071
    Likes Received:
    713
    I wouldn't have any problem with a D-lineman again. We don't have any help opposite Mario .
     
  6. gtexan02

    gtexan02 Working?

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    15,785
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Location:
    Boston
    I for one would be severely disapionted with another Dl in the 1st. Its timme to address other needs on this team, and give the fans something to get excited about
     
  7. mussop

    mussop Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    412
    What could be more exciting than seeing the opposing teams QB looking like the 2006 version of David Carr?
     
  8. rmartin65

    rmartin65 I'm Score

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    7,999
    Likes Received:
    447
    Its time for something new. Detroit got ragged on for picking recievers. The Texans are doing the same thing with DL. Mario worked out, and its too early to tell with Okoye, but Babin is gone and TJ is a role player, not entirely living up to his 1st round billing.
     
  9. D-ReK

    D-ReK RAWWWRR!

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    3,406
    Likes Received:
    99
    Location:
    Avalon
    The difference is that you only have 2 starting WRs, but you have 4 starters on the DL. It's far more understandable to take DL-men in the 1st for 5 years in a row than to take a WR in 4/5. That being said, the only way we take a DE is if it's our worst case scenario and all of the targeted OL, DB, and RB are gone.
     
  10. Ole Miss Texan

    Ole Miss Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    8,688
    Likes Received:
    685
    I'd love to see nothing more than a dominant DL from us but the fact would be we'd pretty much be having our entire DL starting salaries expiring the same year. I'm no expert but I could foresee it becoming a problem in a few years... If the all performed pro-bowl calibre, it could be even worse because they'd all be expecting pay raises and extensions and we'd have extremely way too much $$$ tied in the DL.

    I wouldn't mind see a pass rushing DE opposite mario (a 3 down player) but I think it'd be wise to choose another position in the 1st round this year.
     
  11. ObsiWan

    ObsiWan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    17,937
    Likes Received:
    1,081
    Location:
    League City, Tx
    Detroit got "ragged on" because they had other needs besides WR (like O-line for example) and didn't really address them.
    As long as we get a quality starter, I don't care who we pick first.
    Let's review....
    2002 - HWWNBN -------- Disappointment (it shouldda been Peppers anyway)
    2003 - Andre Johnson --- Pro Bowl caliber starter
    2004 - Dunta Robinson -- Pro Bowl caliber starter
    2004 - Jason Babin ------ Gone; couldn't stay healthy
    2005 - Travis Johnson --- Starter
    2006 - Mario Williams ---- Quality Starter
    2007 - Amobi Okoye ----- Quality Starter

    We haven't done so badly. Seven picks, five hits. Goodness knows where we'd be if Smithiak had been here since day one.

    Let's look at it another way; Kubiak and Smith (Smith really only one) have had two drafts. Out of those two drafts we got 13 guys and, in my mind, only one real mistake, so far.
    - Wali Lundy, he showed flashes of talent but had fumble issues

    There were two, what might be called "misses":
    - David Anderson instead of Marcus Colston in the supplimentary draft
    - Kasey Studdard. Now before you go off, listen. The Colts picked pro bowl CB Antoine Bethea, in the supplimentary part of the 6th round which means we could have had him. Had we picked Bethea instead of Studdard maybe we don't go thru the Petey Faggins nightmare. But perhaps I'm just being greedy now.

    Point is, some teams with 8-9 picks and gobs of salary cap room don't do this well. Who else got as many studs and potential studs as we did out of the last two drafts?
     
  12. BigBull17

    BigBull17 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    5,121
    Likes Received:
    228
    Location:
    Friendswood
    Yeah, but building on the oline and dline is how you build a great team, not WR. You win in the trenches, not with Mr. Glass and the Fat Boy.
     
  13. bigbrewster2000

    bigbrewster2000 4th Infantry

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,350
    Likes Received:
    112
    Location:
    The Woodlands
    I believe the word you are looking for is compensatory picks. The supplimental draft takes place after the regular draft and involves your picks for the following years draft.

    And its easy for fans to look back and cherry pick players in the draft but the fact is that these players (or any for that matter) may not have fit our systems and you dont really know how they would turn out on this team. Certainly their talent could out weigh the situation but you dont know that for sure. Anyway all im saying is you really cant call them misses especially since both Anderson and Studdard have contributed to the team, Studdard probably more so in the future.
     
  14. Maddict5

    Maddict5 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,477
    Likes Received:
    315
    bethea plays safety for the colts.. just an fyi

    and the guys we 'missed' are 6th and 7th rders... il take that especially since you can only mention one example of another team getting lucky after the guys we picked
     
  15. painekiller

    painekiller Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,067
    Likes Received:
    124
    Location:
    On the West Belt
    Plus we do not run a Tampa 2 defense. Guys that excell in the Tampa2 do not normally fit the defense we are trying to run.
     
  16. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    20,741
    Likes Received:
    1,464
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    We're trying to run a defense? Are you sure?
     

Share This Page