Texans doing too much, too soon in Kubiaks first season with conversion to 4-3 ?

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by nunusguy, Jun 21, 2006.

  1. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    With what Kubiak has done for the offense in his very first year, I'm already
    of the opinion that his hiring is a success, though that's obviously a premature conclusion on my part. But by bringing in FA Flanahan and drafting
    Spencer & Winston, and giving Wand another chance to develope, he's given
    more reason to be optimistic about the OL that the former regime did in 4 yrs.
    And getting a legit #2 WR in Moulds, plus a real pass receiveing TE in Putzier
    and the rookie Daniels has given us more reason to be hopeful about the passing game than ever before. And with all these new offensive weapons and the kinda coaching Carr is getting from Kubiaks himself, theres hope that Carr can finally realize his full potential.
    But how about a more gradual conversion to the 4-3 ? Afterall we've been drafting 3-4 for 4 years now, and our 2 top picks this year are D guys who
    could play the 3-4 as well as the 4-3. And the maybe another year of FA and another college Draft to get all the pieces we need for a better chance of success in the 4-3 ?
    How 'bout a starting front seven in the 3-4 for '06 from these players:
    Mario & Weaver @ DEs & Seth Payne @ NT, DeMeco & Greenwood @ inside
    LBs, with a corp of OLBs to choose from that includes Babin, Orr, Peek, &
    Anderson ?
     
  2. Exascor

    Exascor Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,629
    Likes Received:
    120
    Location:
    Atascocita
    The Texans had one of the worst defenses in the NFL last season. The Texans 3-4 was the worst I've ever seen hit the field. No pressure, no turnovers and weak against the run. Those are all supposed to be the strengths of the 3-4. Why not trash the garbage system and begin using the 4-3 now? Did the Texans have some great 3-4 players? No. The time to change is now.
     
  3. texan279

    texan279 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    6,216
    Likes Received:
    164
    Location:
    Rosenberg TX
    Shouldn't be a problem. Most of the guys on our defense now either came from 4-3 teams or played in the 4-3 when drafted by us, guys like Babin, TJ, Wong, Robaire, and others all played in the 4-3 before coming here.
     
  4. GP

    GP Go Texans!

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,573
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    I don't, and never will, think that the 3-4 is a good scheme.

    Some say it's how we used it, or how we staffed players into it.

    I say it's an overrated scheme. And those who point to Steelers or Pats...hold on a second: Those teams still incorporate a fourth down lineman on several plays, making it a 4-3 if you ask me.

    How anyone can think that 3 down linemen trying to "tie up" four offensive linemen is a real head scratcher to me. The theory goes that you can use a NT to tie up two linemen and thus have your other defenders overwhelm the offensive line which is now supposed to be outnumbered because the NT "tied up" two linemen. Sure. :ok:

    IMO, in today's NFL--with offensive linemen getting bigger, faster, and stronger--you gotta' put four-on-four and THEN pray that your LBs and CBs can run up and take on the TE and/or blocking RBs to engage the ball carrier.

    No, I think the 4-3 is going to provide at least (AT LEAST) an upgrade for us. We might not be in the top 3 at the end of the year...but we'll dang sure be better on D.
     
  5. Señor Stan

    Señor Stan El Guapo

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,083
    Likes Received:
    985
    Here is Texans D-line coach Bob Karmelowicz's view on the 4-3 vs. 3-4...

    http://www.houstontexans.com/news/news_detail.php?PRKey=2435

    Earlier in the article (written before the draft) Karmelowicz was concerned about the pass rush from the DE....

    I think Mario fits that bill pretty well. I also like the fact the Karmelowicz is such a good teacher. If he can take a fourth rounder from Idaho St. to that llevel, just think what he can do with Mario!
     
  6. Bearfan Blue and Orange

    Bearfan Blue and Orange Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    18
    I think if you ask just about any Defensive player, they prefer to play a 4-3 defense versus a 3-4 defense.

    The 4-3 defense allows the players to be more agressive and disciplined with their assignments. With a 3-4 defense there has to be a team that is always on the same page and knows instictively what the other is doing and going to be effective.

    This defensive roster is made to be a 4-3 defense and not a 3-4 defense. That is the coaching staff from before error in assessing the talent. To be a successful coach you have to realize when to make a change in schemes for your players to be effective not change your players to YOUR scheme. You build off their strengths and SET THEM UP TO SUCCEED, NOT SET UP TO FAIL!!

    The last coaching staff set these athletes up for FAILURE!!!

    You will see the talent the Texans have, but have not been organized to play their strengths until this new staff has come in.
     
  7. AFD1717

    AFD1717 Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    Messages:
    326
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    The 3-4 scheme is a very good system, but we are a shining example of the fact that just because guys have the measurables to be good 3-4 players doesn't mean they will be. Babin, Johnson, Peek, Wong, Smith, and a host of other guys have the ability to excel in the 3-4 but you have to play your position completely differently than a 4-3. That isn't something they are all willing (or able) to do. As was mentioned before, most of our guys came from 4-3 defenses and that is the system that made them millionaires. Not easy to get them to abandon that. Some players take to it and some don't. We don't have the personnel to play a 3-4 on a regular basis.
     
  8. Double Barrel

    Double Barrel Modified Simian

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Messages:
    33,478
    Likes Received:
    3,150
    Location:
    Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
    The 3-4 requires exceptional players and depth at every position to be successful. That's why you can use the Patriots and Steelers as examples. They've got both.

    But on a mediocre team, the 3-4 becomes a burden. Without a dominant d-line, running against it becomes rather easy with only 3 big guys up front. Then you need your LBs to be quick - both in proactive coverage of their assignments and reactive with the flow of the play - but we didn't have those kind of payers, either. The first year we had a lot of veteran players than adapted, so it was mildly successful. But our coaches were unable to mold the new talent into a cohesive unit, and the 3-4 only served to highlight our weaknesses.

    I'm stoked we've gone to a 4-3. It might be a bit more predictable, but when it works and your players form a solid unit, it can be a tough defense to beat. Putting pressure on the pocket and stuffing the run are concepts that we have not seen around these parts in quite awhile, and I'm really looking forward to getting back to some basic fundamentals that were severely lacking on this team last year.
     


  9. wicked_wayz

    wicked_wayz all blacks

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    auckland, new zealand
     
  10. TwinSisters

    TwinSisters Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,470
    Likes Received:
    40
    Location:
    In my mind.
     
  11. HomeBred_Texan

    HomeBred_Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    32
    I agree, Out with old and in with the new. It is a proven fact that Casserly and Capers blew it. So let's move on and I enjoy seeing what they are doing on defense this year. Like a breath of fresh air...
     
  12. Bearfan Blue and Orange

    Bearfan Blue and Orange Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    18
    Just with the player improvements, coaching changes, better direction. I see this Defense ranking 16 or better. Once I see them play some and go through training camp, and a couple games, I will make a better assessment.
     
  13. hollywood_texan

    hollywood_texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    213
    3-4 provides more deception in schemes. Meaning, it should be harder for the quarterback to read the defense.
     
  14. El Tejano

    El Tejano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    9,940
    Likes Received:
    449
    Change is good. Change is good.
     
  15. TexanFan881

    TexanFan881 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    59
    Location:
    Illinois
    Especially for a 2-14 team :stirpot: :mario:
     
  16. MorKnolle

    MorKnolle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,210
    Likes Received:
    127
    Agree, if they're wanting to run a 4-3 defense for the long-term they shouldn't waste a year formulating and teaching some version of a 3-4 just to change it a year down the road. I think our team is built quite nicely for a 4-3 right now, and we could run some 3-4 if they really want to throw those in there on occasion.
     
  17. TexanFan881

    TexanFan881 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    59
    Location:
    Illinois
    Anyone think that maybe we run a little 3-4 this year? Maybe to confuse the opposing offenses? Just to mix things up a little bit. We've got players that can play in the 3-4. Just an "out there" thought :hmmm:
     
  18. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    56,470
    Likes Received:
    2,993
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    It's not out there at all--they have already said the 4-3 will be the standard set but they will mix in 3-4. Just a reverse of last year when they ran a 3-4 base but frequently moved into a 4-3 look.
     
  19. Meloy

    Meloy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,834
    Likes Received:
    48
    Ok, first we draft a player or sign a free agent that is good in 4-3 defense and then we put him in a 3-4. Then we announce our policy is "stay close to the other team and hope they make mistakes and we can win in the fourth quarter." On offense, we sign guards and convert them to tackles or hey, I know.. a center! Let's sign a free agent corner that's known as a finesse guy that goes for interceptions and hope he becomes a fearsome tackler. Sheesh.All of my nickles and dimes are on Kubes. Whatever he wants he gets for at least two years.. well maybe one.
     
  20. TexanFan881

    TexanFan881 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    59
    Location:
    Illinois
    Thanks to that we're already set for the 4-3 :stirpot:
     

Share This Page