Texans DL

Discussion in 'Mock Draft Talk' started by JB, Mar 15, 2010.

?

NT or UT?

  1. Big ugly NT...Dan Williams?

    17 vote(s)
    58.6%
  2. Penetrating UT...Brian Price?

    12 vote(s)
    41.4%
  1. JB

    JB Old Curmudgeon

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    28,550
    Likes Received:
    817
    Location:
    In Transit
    I do not know all the ins and outs of DL play, but I think we all agree that
    DT is a huge need. But do we need a 2 gap, line clogging, double-team commanding NT that will tie up the line and free the backers to make plays...

    Or, do we need a 1 gap, penetrating quicker Dt?

    I think the Texans are not ready to give up on Okoye, so they will be looking for a stout NT to put next to him, hopefully freeing him up to get more penetration.

    What think you?

    I am going with big ugly.
     
  2. painekiller

    painekiller Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,070
    Likes Received:
    124
    Location:
    On the West Belt
    Dan Williams is a big ugly, and he is not a sack machine, but he does have the ability to push the pocket back thus taking away the step up. That should make it easier for Mario, Barwin and who ever is playing next to him.
     
  3. Wolf6151

    Wolf6151 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,614
    Likes Received:
    132
    Location:
    Pearland, Texas
    Dan Williams by far the better DT and much better for our team.
     
  4. JB

    JB Old Curmudgeon

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    28,550
    Likes Received:
    817
    Location:
    In Transit
    Ok, but I did not mean those players in particular. I was using those as examples of the types of DT that we would need.

    If we waited until the third round to select a DT, and there was an equally rated NT and UT; which would fill the Texans need better?
     
  5. Lucky

    Lucky Moderator

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,328
    Likes Received:
    1,520
    In that case, the penetrating DT. Because I don't think the Texans are interested in a 2 gapper. But, I think Williams is capable of either style.
     
  6. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    13,005
    Likes Received:
    550
    how about neither. I don't want no stinking 1st rd. DT we have other pressing needs too in case you forgot, plus Cody & Deljuan are both healthy now :cow:
     
  7. Hottoddie

    Hottoddie Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    102
    Location:
    Cypress
    Linval Joseph in the 3rd or 4th round.
     
  8. JB

    JB Old Curmudgeon

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    28,550
    Likes Received:
    817
    Location:
    In Transit
    I never said a first round DT. I am trying to get a better feel for what Smithiak is looking for.
     


  9. Shaft75

    Shaft75 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,091
    Likes Received:
    272
    I'm voting for penetration(lol). Until we roll out a 3-4, or some hybrid of it, I think our line should be quicker and more disruptive. I played NT and 3 technique, and feel like our d was cognitively better when we had movement and stunting along the d-line.
     
  10. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,717
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    Don't think a big ugly is in the cards for Texans who stopped the run after 3rd or 4th game.
     
  11. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    56,407
    Likes Received:
    2,977
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    2nd in the league after the 1st game v. 18th on passing D.

    Looking a little more at the passing D

    18th on yards per game.
    10th on ypa
    10th on TDs
    22nd on INTs (in contrast we were 8th on fumbles)
    10th on 1st downs
    11th on 1st down %
    7th on plays 20+
    12th on plays 40+
    25th on sacks
    14th QB rating

    Picture of a team getting dinked and dunked which naturally results in a reduction in sacks with quick passes. 22nd on INTs sucks. Gibbs really needs to coach to attack the ball.
     
  12. Ole Miss Texan

    Ole Miss Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    8,696
    Likes Received:
    685
    We've got great pressure coming from the outside... we HAVE to start collapsing the pocket from the middle.
     
  13. wagonhed

    wagonhed Team Gruden

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    194
    Location:
    Denton
    It seems like a NT would be better for our pass rush than would a 2nd lightweight pass-rushing DT. Do we want someone shooting through the middle or collapsing the pocket? It doesn't really matter because I don't think the Texans will even consider a NT type.
     
  14. krocket

    krocket Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    9
    This is the "Make it-or-Break it" year for Okoye IMO. If he can't help significantly this year his days will be numbered. That said, I am with the "We need a big ugly" type that can soak up blockers on short runs and (especially) collapse the pocket to assist the pass rushers and db's by robbing the opposing QB's of time, their most precious commodity. If he can not step up into the pocket, because there isn't one, we are at a distinct advantage. Our sack total and intercepts will rise accordingly.
     

Share This Page