Last week, I started a thread entitled "3rd & 19" that I said described the Texans. This week, the descriptor phrase is "St. Louis Rams." Not because of the similarities. But rather, because of the differences. St. Louis Rams: An awful previous season. A rookie QB. Who is their coach again? Few playmakers on their offense AND few playmakers on their defense. And yet there they are: Sitting at 6-6 right now. Is this just luck? How can we rationalize that the Texans are better than the Rams, even though the Rams are clutching out their games and failing to realize how awful they are? Can we even compare these two teams, or is this an apples-to-oranges comparison? Interested to see the responses on the discussion about the path these two teams have taken this season.