Somebody explain why Schaub had 11 plays?

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by Nighthawk, Aug 14, 2007.

  1. Nighthawk

    Nighthawk All Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2004
    Messages:
    719
    Likes Received:
    21
    Here's a new QB who has never run this team, who is starting for the first time in his career, and we put him out there for 11 or 12 plays? Really, he needs at least twice that in three preseason games. It can't be they're afraid of him getting hurt, can it? If he's going down he can do it as easily in game 1 of the season as now.

    Somebody explain this to me, please.
     
  2. ObsiWan

    ObsiWan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    18,912
    Likes Received:
    1,265
    Location:
    League City, Tx
    The main priority for the first two preseason games is to evaluate your lower string guys.

    The first string positions, with a couple of exceptions (#2 WR, C, OLB, FS, KR, P) are already set.

    The first stringers get a couple of series (a) to let the fans see them and (b) to confirm to the coaches that the performance that they've been showing in practice transfers to a real game.

    Now the reason that the first string got so few reps is because they went 3 & out the first time they had the ball. Convert 3rd those downs, they would have earned more reps.
    But 1st team only gets two series if the coaches are to have time to evaluate the 2nd & 3rd team guys. And even then, not all the 3rd/4th string guys saw action.

    Look for more of the same next week.
     
  3. PapaL

    PapaL Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,590
    Likes Received:
    942
    Location:
    Maryland
    We have 48 million reasons for him to play sparingly in the preseason. He is cemented as the starter and thus isn't fighting for a job.
     
  4. michaelm

    michaelm vox nihili

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,961
    Likes Received:
    752
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    Kubiak mentioned on 610 that the starters will be on a "play count" this week against the Cards, meaning he will make sure they're in for a certain number of plays. He said 30-35 plays.
    I took his statement to mean that they weren't going by play count against the Bears, but were going by clock time instead... not sure why they did that, though...
     
  5. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,620
    Likes Received:
    656
    Location:
    Over here.
    Maybe because they wanted to make sure that had however much time for everyone else. This week, they want to get so many plays in for the starters, even if it takes some away from everybody else. I'm surprised they're going to really get THAT many plays in week 2, though.
     
  6. Marcus

    Marcus Ruthless pragmatist

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    8,484
    Likes Received:
    747
    Location:
    Stafford, Texas
    It's called a Standard Operating Procedure, SOP for short, for preseason games that every NFL team goes by.

    Game 1 - you play your starters in the 1st quarter. It would be nonsensical, and downright stupid to leave your starting quarterback in after sending in the 2nd team OL, receivers, and RBs. The main purpose of the game is to evaluate what players can make the team

    Game 2 - use a play count for the starters. If you get in 30 -35 plays in the first quarter, then you only play the 1st quarter.

    Game 3 - prepare as if it's regular season game. Starters play 3 quarters. 4th quarter, send in the rest.

    Game 4 - Starters play one or two series at the most, save them for the season opener, then play the rest to see who makes the final cut.

    Until they either increase, or decrease the number of preseason games, it's the way it's always done.
     
  7. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,620
    Likes Received:
    656
    Location:
    Over here.
    Will we use blitz packages at all against Dallas in game 3? That's what I wanna know.
     
  8. Marcus

    Marcus Ruthless pragmatist

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    8,484
    Likes Received:
    747
    Location:
    Stafford, Texas
    Blitz packages in a preseason game?

    lol:
     


  9. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,620
    Likes Received:
    656
    Location:
    Over here.
    Some teams have been known to do it (supposedly).
     
  10. Marcus

    Marcus Ruthless pragmatist

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    8,484
    Likes Received:
    747
    Location:
    Stafford, Texas
    Kubiak would deserve to be hung up by his thumbs if he gave the opening day opponent game film of his blitzing schemes.
     
    Double Barrel likes this.
  11. Texan_Bill

    Texan_Bill Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    48,675
    Likes Received:
    2,089
    Location:
    Houston. Mediocrity Lives Here!!
    Right on!! Not only not show blitz packages, don't show your d-lines stunts either... Keep it very vanilla.
     
  12. Sideline

    Sideline Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    15
    That seems a little different to usual. I wonder how much time he has planned for the guys next week? as its usually week three when the first teamers see the most snaps.
     
  13. Kaiser Toro

    Kaiser Toro Native Mod

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    16,249
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Location:
    Straight Outta Austin
    I saw one stunt by Mario, and it was a wide stunt, against the Bears. I seem to recall it being his last play of the game.

    He looked like he was a buffalo girl going waaay around the outside.
     
  14. Marcus

    Marcus Ruthless pragmatist

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    8,484
    Likes Received:
    747
    Location:
    Stafford, Texas
    And besides that . . . I'm not the least bit interested in winning any preseason games, I don't care if it's the Cowboys, or anyone else.

    During preseason, what I AM interested in, is to see if that multimegabillion dollar defensive line can manage to generate pressure on the quarterback BY.THEM.SELVES.

    I am NOT the least bit interested in pressure that has to be MANUFACTURED by a blitz. Until this basic hurdle is finally jumped over, this defense will continue to . . . SUCK!

    I am so sick of people trashing the secondary, when they constantly are left hanging out to dry when they have to send the blitz because the front four can't get it done.

    :rant:
     
  15. Htownsportsfan

    Htownsportsfan All Pro

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    763
    Likes Received:
    45
    I would not go as far to say suck! The last six games of the season last season once they began to gel they actually played well and were ranked as a top ten D during the final six games. Dont get me wrong there was still a definate lack of pass rush and still had coverage breakdowns but I would say suck is to harsh.
     
  16. Yankee_In_TX

    Yankee_In_TX Dance Lindsay!

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    12,448
    Likes Received:
    444
    Location:
    Houston, 77008

    That's what Kubes said. Maybe he wished Schaub had 4-5 more reps, but they wanted to stick by their goal to evaluate our newer and/or younger talent.
     
  17. Mr teX

    Mr teX Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,305
    Likes Received:
    518
    Location:
    Everyone Wants The Throne
    Is this dude serious?
     
  18. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,517
    Likes Received:
    1,681
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    I used to think that you didn't blitz hardly at all in the first game. BUT...

    The Bears were blitzing us and we weren't blitzing them until the middle of the 2nd quarter. I think the Bears were expecting us to blitz and were keeping more guys in to block but I'd need to go back and check that.

    I was watching the Eagles/Ravens game and it was blitz, blitz, blitz.
     
  19. HOU-TEX

    HOU-TEX Ah, Football!

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    16,260
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Location:
    P-land
    The Steelers blitzed the heck out of the Saints and that was the HOF game. The Saints were complaining afterwards about not expecting all the blitzing brought on by the Steelers.

    So yes, several teams blitz during pre-season. Personally I don't care if we do or not. I just want our front 4 to deliver some pressure.:)
     
    HJam72 likes this.
  20. Mr teX

    Mr teX Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,305
    Likes Received:
    518
    Location:
    Everyone Wants The Throne
    All blitz-heavy teams, especially Philly & chicago. It's just differences in coach philosophy regarding what should be done for a 1st preseason game.
     

Share This Page