Ok here is my question.The Reggie Bush, Vince Young Debate. Everyone in here seems to think they are an expert so what is your basis on these two players? I have read views from both sides so lets take Reggie first. We all know the guy has moves out of this world and has real good speed, but his knock is his size,can't run up the middle. How do you know? Because USC didn't use him that way? 5'11 203 lbs of solid muscle does not seem small to me. How can you post arguments based on assumptions? Oh because Kiper says so? If you listen to his teammates they say he can run up the middle. If you listen to him, he says he can.Small ,Tony Dorsett was smaller than he is, I think he had a decent career! As far as taking hits he really does not run straight up. Should be able to take glancing blows,if they can catch him.The dude is just awesome,electric.And Vince who cares if he throws it off the ground as long as he completes it. And so what if he scored a 6 or 16 on the wonderlick. He can run, he can move and he can move an offense.You can be dumb as a box of rocks but if you can play, who gives a *******!!! The only debate I have is who helps this year. That vote goes to RB because he can step in NOW!!! Vince will need a year or two before he is ready. But really if you are gonna argue a point use your OWN personal knowledge of the guy not what you read or hear. They are both excellent players, the question is who is the best fit and who helps you NOW.